The impact of the War in Ukraine on Construction

The Ukraine war, which started in 2014, has had far-reaching consequences across various sectors of the Ukrainian economy. One sector significantly affected by the conflict is the construction industry. In this article, we will explore the impact of the Ukraine war on construction, examining the challenges faced by the industry and the potential avenues for recovery. Buildingspecifier.com Editor Joe Bradbury discusses:

 

One of the most evident effects of the Ukraine war on the construction industry is the extensive destruction of infrastructure. Conflict zones have witnessed the bombing of buildings, bridges, roads, and other essential structures. This widespread devastation has disrupted ongoing construction projects, hampering progress and causing significant financial losses. Rebuilding these damaged structures will require extensive construction efforts, providing opportunities for the industry to contribute to the reconstruction and recovery process.

 

Investment and funding

The war has created an atmosphere of uncertainty, making it difficult to attract both domestic and foreign investment in the construction sector. Potential investors are wary of the unstable political and economic conditions, leading to a decline in funding for new projects. The lack of investment has further exacerbated the challenges faced by construction companies, hindering their ability to recover and rebuild. To address this issue, the Ukrainian government needs to prioritize stabilizing the country’s political situation, ensuring the rule of law, and implementing transparent regulations to instil confidence in investors.

 

Displacement of skilled labour

The conflict has resulted in the displacement of skilled labourers who have fled the affected regions in search of safety and stability. This has created a shortage of skilled workers in the construction industry, impacting project timelines and quality. The loss of experienced professionals has also hindered the transfer of knowledge and expertise, slowing down the overall progress of the sector. Efforts should be made to attract skilled workers back to the industry by offering competitive wages, providing training programs, and improving overall working conditions.

 

Rising construction costs

The war has led to a surge in construction costs due to several factors. Firstly, the destruction of infrastructure and disruption of supply chains have increased the prices of building materials. Secondly, the lack of security in conflict areas has resulted in additional security measures, adding extra expenses to construction projects. These rising costs have placed a strain on construction companies’ budgets, making it challenging to complete projects within agreed timelines and budgets. The government can play a role in mitigating these costs by offering tax incentives, subsidies, and access to affordable financing options for construction companies.

Stalled projects and delayed infrastructure development

As a result of the conflict, many ongoing construction projects have come to a halt or experienced significant delays. Contractors and developers face challenges in securing necessary permits, accessing construction sites, and coordinating with suppliers. The overall slowdown in construction activity has impeded infrastructure development, hindering economic growth and urban development in affected regions. Streamlining bureaucratic processes, improving permitting procedures, and providing a secure environment for construction activities are essential steps to overcome these challenges.

 

Reconstruction opportunities

While the war has undoubtedly had a detrimental impact on the construction industry, it has also presented reconstruction opportunities. Efforts to rebuild destroyed infrastructure, restore damaged buildings, and revitalize cities will require significant construction projects. This opens up new avenues for investment and job creation in the sector, offering hope for its recovery. The Ukrainian government can actively promote these opportunities by providing incentives and facilitating partnerships between local and international stakeholders.

 

Government initiatives

Recognizing the importance of revitalizing the construction industry, the Ukrainian government has implemented several initiatives to support recovery. These include providing tax incentives and subsidies to construction companies, streamlining bureaucratic processes, and encouraging public-private partnerships. Additionally, international organizations and donor countries have contributed funds to support reconstruction efforts, injecting much-needed capital into the sector. These collaborative efforts should continue to ensure sustained progress in rebuilding and developing Ukraine’s infrastructure.

 

Shift towards sustainable construction

Amidst the challenges posed by the war, there is an opportunity for the construction industry to embrace sustainable practices. By prioritizing eco-friendly designs, energy-efficient buildings, and resilient infrastructure, Ukraine can rebuild in a more sustainable and resilient manner. This shift towards sustainable construction can not only benefit the environment but also attract international investors who prioritize sustainability. The adoption of green building standards, such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), can help Ukraine position itself as a leader in sustainable construction practices.

 

Collaborative efforts with international partners

To expedite the recovery process and overcome the challenges faced by the construction industry, Ukraine should actively seek collaboration with international partners. This can involve engaging with international organizations, such as the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, to access financial resources and technical expertise. Partnering with international construction companies can also bring in valuable knowledge, advanced technologies, and project management expertise to enhance the efficiency and quality of construction projects.

 

Emphasis on resilient infrastructure

Given the experience of the war and ongoing geopolitical tensions, there is a need to prioritize resilient infrastructure in Ukraine. By integrating resilient design principles and disaster risk reduction measures, the construction industry can contribute to building infrastructure that can withstand future challenges, including natural disasters and potential conflicts. This focus on resilience can enhance the long-term sustainability and stability of the built environment in Ukraine.

 

In summary

The Ukraine war has had a profound impact on the construction industry, with widespread destruction, displacement of skilled labour, and rising costs. However, amidst the challenges lie opportunities for recovery and growth. With government support, international assistance, and a focus on sustainable construction practices, the sector can gradually rebuild and contribute to Ukraine’s overall economic recovery and development. By prioritizing infrastructure reconstruction, attracting investment, and fostering a skilled workforce, Ukraine can rebuild its cities, create employment opportunities, and lay the foundation for a brighter future.

/0 Comments/by

Creating a sustainable future

As the world grapples with the challenges of climate change and resource depletion, the concept of an environmentally friendly built environment has gained significant importance. Designing and constructing spaces that minimise their ecological footprint is essential for creating a sustainable future. Buildingspecifier Editor Joe Bradbury explores what an entirely environmentally friendly built environment might look like, highlighting key principles and innovative solutions.

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

An environmentally friendly built environment prioritises energy efficiency and the utilisation of renewable energy sources. Buildings are designed with high-performance insulation, energy-efficient appliances, and LED lighting systems. Passive design techniques, such as proper orientation and shading, maximise natural light and minimise the need for artificial lighting.

Renewable energy generation is integrated into the built environment. Buildings incorporate rooftop solar panels, wind turbines, and geothermal systems to harness clean energy. Excess energy can be stored in on-site battery systems or fed back into the grid, promoting sustainability and reducing reliance on fossil fuels.

Green Building Materials

Environmentally friendly buildings rely on sustainable, non-toxic building materials. Recycled materials (such as reclaimed wood and recycled steel) minimise resource extraction and reduce waste. Bio-based materials, like bamboo and cork, offer renewable alternatives to traditional materials.

Innovative construction materials, such as carbon-negative concrete and hempcrete, have a lower carbon footprint and sequester carbon dioxide during their life cycle. These materials contribute to carbon neutrality and reduce the environmental impact of the built environment.

Water Efficiency and Conservation

An environmentally friendly built environment emphasises water efficiency and conservation. Buildings incorporate low-flow fixtures, dual-flush toilets, and rainwater harvesting systems. Greywater recycling systems treat and reuse water from sinks, showers, and laundry, reducing reliance on freshwater sources.

Landscaping design includes native, drought-resistant plants that require minimal irrigation. Permeable surfaces, such as permeable pavement and green roofs, allow rainwater infiltration, reducing stormwater runoff and alleviating strain on drainage systems.

Smart and Connected Systems

Smart and connected systems play a vital role in an environmentally friendly built environment. Building automation systems monitor and control energy usage, optimizing heating, cooling, and lighting based on occupancy and external conditions. Advanced sensors and controls adjust systems in real-time, maximising energy efficiency.

Internet of Things (IoT) devices enable efficient resource management. Smart meters track energy and water consumption, providing real-time data for better decision-making. Connected transportation systems promote sustainable mobility, encouraging walking, cycling, and the use of electric vehicles.

Waste Reduction and Circular Economy

Minimising waste and embracing the principles of the circular economy are fundamental aspects of an environmentally friendly built environment. Buildings are designed for deconstruction and materials recovery, allowing for easy disassembly and reuse of components at the end of their life cycle.

Construction sites implement waste management plans, diverting waste from landfills through recycling and composting. Pre-fabrication and modular construction techniques reduce waste generation during construction and enable efficient resource utilisation.

Urban Planning and Green Spaces

An environmentally friendly built environment incorporates thoughtful urban planning and the integration of green spaces. Compact, walkable neighborhoods reduce the need for extensive transportation and promote a sense of community. Mixed-use developments facilitate access to amenities, reducing the need for car travel.

Green spaces, such as parks, urban forests, and rooftop gardens, improve air quality, mitigate urban heat island effects, and enhance biodiversity. These areas provide recreational spaces for residents and contribute to overall well-being.

Community Engagement and Education

Creating an environmentally friendly built environment requires community engagement and education. Residents are involved in the design process, ensuring that their needs and preferences are considered. Educational initiatives raise awareness about sustainable practices, encouraging residents to adopt eco-friendly habits.

Community gardens, composting programs, and shared resources promote a sense of ownership and encourage sustainable living. Collaboration between residents, local authorities, and building professionals fosters a culture of environmental stewardship.

Resilience and Climate Adaptation

An environmentally friendly built environment takes into account the challenges posed by climate change and focuses on resilience and adaptation. Buildings are designed to withstand extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, floods, and heatwaves. Robust construction methods, reinforced structures, and elevated foundations are employed to enhance resilience.

Integration of green infrastructure, such as bioswales and permeable surfaces, helps manage stormwater runoff during heavy rainfall events. Elevated or flood-resistant building designs mitigate flood risks in low-lying areas. Utilising natural ventilation and passive cooling strategies reduces reliance on energy-intensive cooling systems during heatwaves.

 

Additionally, the built environment embraces nature-based solutions to enhance climate resilience. Planting trees and creating green corridors can help mitigate urban heat island effects, improve air quality, and provide shade. Building and infrastructure designs incorporate climate data and future projections to ensure long-term adaptability.

By considering resilience and climate adaptation in the design and construction of the built environment, we can create spaces that are better equipped to withstand the impacts of climate change, protect communities, and promote sustainability.

What’s the alternative?

If we do not prioritise the construction of a sustainable built environment, several negative consequences could arise:

Increased Environmental Degradation: The construction industry is a significant contributor to environmental degradation. Without sustainable practices, we would continue to deplete finite resources, such as timber and minerals, at an unsustainable rate. The extraction and processing of these resources lead to deforestation, habitat destruction, and soil erosion. Additionally, the energy-intensive processes involved in traditional construction, such as concrete production, contribute to high levels of carbon emissions and air pollution.

Higher Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions: Buildings account for a significant portion of global energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Without energy-efficient designs and renewable energy integration, buildings would continue to rely heavily on fossil fuel-based energy sources. This would contribute to increased carbon emissions and exacerbate the effects of climate change. Rising energy demands would also put a strain on existing energy infrastructure and lead to increased costs for individuals and communities.

Vulnerability to Climate Change: Climate change is already impacting our planet, with more frequent and severe weather events. If the built environment is not designed to withstand these challenges, communities would become more vulnerable to flooding, heatwaves, storms, and other climate-related hazards. Lack of resilient infrastructure would result in increased property damage, displacement of residents, and disruption of essential services.

Waste Generation and Landfill Overload: Construction and demolition waste contribute to significant landfill volumes. Without sustainable practices, buildings would continue to generate substantial amounts of waste during construction, renovation, and demolition. This would not only strain waste management systems but also squander valuable resources that could be recycled or repurposed. Additionally, improper waste disposal can lead to soil and water pollution, further degrading the environment.

Adverse Health Impacts: Non-sustainable built environments can have adverse health effects on occupants. Poor indoor air quality due to inadequate ventilation, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from construction materials, and exposure to toxins can lead to respiratory problems, allergies, and other health issues. Lack of natural light, improper noise insulation, and inadequate thermal comfort can also impact occupants’ well-being and productivity.

Social and Economic Inequity: Unsustainable built environments often perpetuate social and economic inequalities. Communities with limited access to sustainable housing and infrastructure face higher energy costs, decreased quality of life, and limited opportunities for social and economic advancement. Lack of affordable, energy-efficient housing options exacerbates housing crises and further marginalises vulnerable populations.

Missed Opportunities for Innovation and Economic Growth: Building a sustainable built environment provides opportunities for innovation, job creation, and economic growth. By embracing sustainable practices, the construction industry can drive the development and adoption of green technologies, creating new business opportunities and employment prospects. Failing to invest in sustainable construction means missing out on these economic benefits and falling behind in the global shift towards a greener economy.

Neglecting to build a sustainable built environment would lead to worsening environmental degradation, increased energy consumption and carbon emissions, heightened vulnerability to climate change, waste generation, adverse health impacts, social and economic inequity, and missed opportunities for innovation and economic growth. To mitigate these negative consequences, it is imperative that we prioritise sustainability in construction and design, adopting energy-efficient practices, renewable energy sources, and resilient infrastructure to create a better future for both the planet and its inhabitants.

In summary

Designing an entirely environmentally friendly built environment is a multifaceted endeavor that requires a comprehensive approach. By incorporating energy efficiency, renewable energy, green building materials, water efficiency, smart systems, waste reduction, thoughtful urban planning, community engagement, and resilience to climate change, we can create a built environment that minimises its ecological footprint and promotes a sustainable future.

From sustainable materials to smart technologies, from energy-efficient designs to community engagement, each aspect plays a crucial role in transforming our buildings and cities into sustainable, resilient, and liveable spaces. It is through innovative thinking, collaboration, and a commitment to sustainable practices that we can build a better future for ourselves and future generations.

By embracing the principles of environmental sustainability in the built environment, we not only reduce our impact on the planet but also create healthier, more comfortable spaces for people to live and thrive. Together, let us strive to design and construct an environmentally friendly built environment that supports our well-being while preserving the beauty and integrity of our natural world.

/0 Comments/by

Exploring the depths: The implications of humans living under the sea

The practicality and feasibility of humans living under the sea are still subjects of exploration and debate. The technical challenges, costs, and potential environmental impacts pose significant hurdles. However, considering the vastness and importance of the world’s oceans, underwater habitation holds the potential for exciting scientific discoveries, environmental conservation, and technological advancements that can benefit humanity both underwater and on land. Buildingspecifier.com Editor Joe Bradbury discusses:

Approximately 71% of the Earth’s surface is covered by oceans, making it the dominant feature on our planet. The oceans, which include the Atlantic, Pacific, Indian, Southern, and Arctic oceans, contain vast bodies of saltwater and play a vital role in regulating the Earth’s climate, supporting diverse marine ecosystems, and providing resources and livelihoods for human populations around the world. The remaining 29% of the Earth’s surface consists of continents, islands, and other land masses.

The concept of living under the sea has intrigued humanity for centuries, blending scientific curiosity, imaginative storytelling, and futuristic visions. Ancient civilizations had myths and stories that involved underwater realms and creatures. For example, in Greek mythology, there were tales of the god Poseidon and the city of Atlantis, which was said to have been submerged beneath the sea.

The idea of creating an enclosed space for humans to explore underwater began to take shape in the 16th and 17th centuries. Inventors such as Guglielmo de Lorena and Edmund Halley developed early versions of diving bells, allowing limited exploration and work beneath the water’s surface.

In the early 20th century, advancements in technology led to the development of submersibles like the bathysphere. In 1930, William Beebe and Otis Barton descended in a bathysphere to a depth of over 800 meters, opening up new possibilities for underwater exploration.

The 1960s saw the establishment of underwater habitats, which allowed scientists to live and conduct research underwater for extended periods. The Conshelf program, initiated by Jacques Cousteau, showcased the potential of living in underwater habitats and conducting scientific studies.

The United States Navy’s Sealab program, initiated in the 1960s, focused on developing undersea habitats for military and scientific purposes. The program facilitated extended stays and scientific experiments at depths of up to 183 meters.

Over the years, various underwater habitats and research stations have been established, including Aquarius Reef Base and NEEMO. These habitats serve as platforms for scientific research, training, and experimentation in underwater environments.

With advancements in technology, there is ongoing speculation about the potential for permanent human habitation under the sea. Concepts like seasteading, which involve the creation of floating or submerged communities, have gained attention as potential future living environments.

Throughout history, the concept of living under the sea has captured the imagination of people, blending scientific inquiry, exploration, and imaginative storytelling. While the idea of permanent underwater habitation remains challenging, ongoing research, technological advancements, and a growing understanding of marine ecosystems continue to expand our knowledge and possibilities for underwater exploration and living.

Here are some key points to consider:

Underwater habitats

Underwater habitats are designed structures that allow humans to live and work underwater for extended periods. These habitats can be located in shallow coastal waters or at greater depths, such as on the ocean floor or submerged in underwater caves.

Living underwater offers several potential advantages. The ocean provides a vast, largely unexplored environment rich in biodiversity, which presents opportunities for scientific research and discovery. Additionally, underwater habitats could potentially serve as off-grid, self-sustaining communities, utilizing renewable energy sources such as wave or tidal power.

Technical and environmental challenges

There are significant challenges associated with underwater habitation. The construction and maintenance of habitats capable of withstanding high water pressures, extreme temperatures, and corrosive saltwater environments present engineering obstacles. Life support systems, waste management, and ensuring a continuous supply of food and water are also complex considerations.

Research and exploration

Despite the challenges, underwater habitats have been utilized for scientific research and exploration. These missions allow scientists to study marine life, observe underwater ecosystems, and conduct experiments in controlled environments. Examples include the Aquarius Reef Base in Florida and the NEEMO (NASA Extreme Environment Mission Operations) project.

Current limitations

While underwater habitats have been used for research and short-term missions, long-term human habitation remains a distant possibility. The costs, logistical challenges, and technical requirements involved in creating self-sustaining, permanent underwater habitats are significant. The focus of current efforts primarily lies in research, exploration, and understanding the potential of underwater environments rather than establishing permanent human settlements.

In conclusion

While experimental underwater habitats exist and have contributed to scientific research, the challenges of constructing and maintaining permanent subaquatic communities are substantial. However, ongoing research and technological advancements may provide valuable insights and open up possibilities for future exploration and utilization of underwater environments.

The result of humans living under the sea could have several implications and outcomes. Living under the sea could offer unique opportunities for scientific exploration and discovery. It would allow for in-depth research on marine life, ecosystems, and the impact of human activities on the underwater environment. This could lead to a better understanding of the ocean’s biodiversity, ecology, and the potential for new pharmaceutical and biotechnological advancements.

Establishing underwater habitats could foster a greater sense of responsibility and stewardship for the marine environment. Living in close proximity to marine ecosystems may increase awareness of the importance of conservation and drive efforts to protect and preserve the oceans from pollution, overfishing, and other environmental threats.

Living under the sea would require humans to adapt to the underwater environment. This could result in physiological changes, such as the evolution of specialized traits for underwater survival. Additionally, the development of underwater communities could foster unique social structures, lifestyles, and cultural practices specific to this environment.

/0 Comments/by

IS MARS THE NEW FRONTIER FOR CONSTRUCTION

Construction on Mars: Pioneering human expansion and exploration

Construction on Mars presents a new frontier for human exploration and colonization beyond Earth. As scientists and space agencies envision a future where humans establish a sustainable presence on the red planet, the challenges and opportunities of construction in this extraterrestrial environment come into focus. From creating habitable structures to utilizing local resources, innovative engineering and adaptive construction techniques will be required to overcome the harsh Martian conditions.Buildingspecifier.com Editor Joe Bradbury investigates:

Elon Musk

Elon Musk, the CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, has been at the forefront of advocating for human colonization of Mars. He envisions establishing a self-sustaining civilization on the red planet as a way to ensure the long-term survival of humanity.

Musk’s aerospace company, SpaceX, is developing a fully reusable spacecraft called Starship. Designed for long-duration space travel, Starship aims to transport humans and cargo to Mars. It is envisioned as a multi-purpose spacecraft capable of carrying a large number of passengers and significant amounts of cargo. Musk envisions that Starship will play a pivotal role in establishing a sustainable human presence on Mars.

The entrepreneur has outlined a vision for Mars colonization, with the ultimate goal of creating a self-sustaining civilization. He envisions building a city on Mars, complete with infrastructure, habitats, and support systems necessary for human survival. Musk believes that by harnessing local resources, such as Martian regolith and ice, and leveraging technologies like 3D printing and in-situ resource utilization, it will be possible to create a sustainable habitat on the planet.

He has proposed an interplanetary transport system that would facilitate travel between Earth and Mars. This system would involve regular and frequent flights using reusable spacecraft, like the Starship, to transport people and cargo to and from Mars. The aim is to establish a transport infrastructure that can support large-scale colonization efforts and make Mars a more accessible destination for human exploration.

When will we reach Mars?

While there is no definitive timeline, Musk has expressed his goal of sending the first crewed mission to Mars as early as the 2020s. SpaceX has been actively working on the development and testing of Starship prototypes and conducting missions to demonstrate various capabilities. Musk acknowledges the significant challenges involved in Mars colonization but remains optimistic about making substantial progress in the coming years.

How will we build there?

Mars has captivated the imagination of scientists, researchers, and space enthusiasts for decades. As humanity continues to expand its horizons, the possibility of establishing a human presence on Mars becomes an increasingly realistic goal. Constructing habitats and infrastructure on Mars will be a monumental undertaking, requiring innovative engineering solutions and adaptive construction techniques. In this article, we will explore the challenges, strategies, and potential approaches for construction on Mars.

Challenges of construction on Mars

Extreme environment: Mars poses numerous challenges due to its extreme environment. The planet experiences harsh temperatures, intense radiation, and a thin atmosphere that lacks the protection offered by Earth’s magnetic field. Construction techniques must account for these challenges, including the need for radiation shielding, temperature regulation, and durability against Mars’ atmospheric conditions.

Distance and communication: The vast distance between Earth and Mars introduces significant communication delays. This delay makes real-time remote control of construction equipment impossible, necessitating autonomous or semi-autonomous construction processes. Construction techniques must be able to operate with minimal human intervention and leverage advanced robotics and AI systems for efficient decision-making.

Limited resources: Unlike Earth, Mars has limited resources readily available for construction; traditional construction materials like wood and concrete are scarce, if not absent, on the Martian surface. Construction methods must adapt to utilize Martian resources such as regolith (Martian soil), ice deposits, and local minerals. In-situ resource utilization (ISRU) will be crucial to reduce reliance on Earth for construction materials and minimize the cost and logistics of transporting supplies.

Strategies for construction on Mars

Pre-fabrication and robotics: Given the challenges of the Martian environment and the limitations of human presence, pre-fabrication and robotic construction techniques will play a crucial role. On Earth, pre-fabrication involves constructing components off-site and assembling them at the final location. Similarly, on Mars, pre-fabricated modules could be transported from Earth or manufactured using local resources, reducing the complexity and cost of on-site construction. Robotics and autonomous systems will be instrumental in assembling and integrating these pre-fabricated components efficiently.

3D Printing: Additive manufacturing, or 3D printing, holds immense promise for Martian construction. Using regolith as a raw material, 3D printers can create structures layer by layer, eliminating the need to transport bulky construction materials from Earth. The European Space Agency’s MELT project and NASA’s Mars Ice House concept are examples of utilizing 3D printing technology to construct habitable structures on Mars. 3D printing offers the advantage of flexibility, enabling the construction of customized designs and adapting to the specific needs of Mars’ environment.

In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU): Leveraging the resources available on Mars through ISRU will be crucial for sustainable construction. Martian regolith can be processed to extract minerals and use them as building materials. Ice deposits found in the Martian poles can be harvested and utilized for water supply, life support systems, and as a raw material for manufacturing construction materials. ISRU will minimize the need for transporting materials from Earth, reducing costs and increasing self-sufficiency.

Habitat Design: Martian habitats must be designed to provide a safe and comfortable environment for humans. They need to withstand the harsh Martian conditions while supporting the physical and psychological well-being of the inhabitants. Design considerations include radiation shielding, thermal insulation, airtight seals, and the integration of life support systems. Habitats may employ underground or partially buried structures to provide additional protection from radiation and temperature extremes. Innovative architectural designs, such as inflatable structures or modular expandable habitats, can maximize habitable space while minimizing launch mass.

Potential benefits and impacts

Human expansion and exploration: Construction on Mars will be a significant milestone in human space exploration. Establishing habitable structures will allow for longer-duration missions, enabling astronauts to conduct in-depth scientific research and explore the planet’s surface more extensively. It sets the stage for eventual human colonization and opens doors to further space exploration, potentially paving the way for future missions to other celestial bodies.

Technological advancements: The challenges of Martian construction will drive technological advancements with practical applications on Earth. The development of autonomous robots, 3D printing technologies, advanced materials, and resource utilization techniques will have broader implications for terrestrial industries such as construction, mining, and robotics. The knowledge and experience gained from Mars construction projects will contribute to innovation and push the boundaries of engineering and space exploration.

Scientific discoveries: Construction activities on Mars can also provide valuable scientific insights. The excavation of Martian regolith and the analysis of local minerals can deepen our understanding of the planet’s geology and the potential for supporting life. Construction sites may serve as testbeds for conducting experiments and studying the effects of the Martian environment on materials, equipment, and human physiology.

In conclusion

The construction of habitats and infrastructure on Mars is a monumental endeavour that requires innovative engineering, adaptation to extreme conditions, and the utilization of local resources. Pre-fabrication, 3D printing and ISRU will play vital roles in achieving sustainable and cost-effective construction on the Red Planet. The challenges and solutions associated with Martian construction will contribute to technological advancements, human exploration, and scientific discoveries. As we continue to push the boundaries of space exploration, construction on Mars represents a crucial step towards the expansion of humanity beyond Earth’s boundaries and the realization of long-held dreams of interplanetary exploration.

/0 Comments/by

The long and winding journey of HS2, still without end

,

Despite having very little public support, HS2 continues to tear its way through our countryside and villages, destroying countless habitats and displacing people from their homes. Those in favour estimate it to create 22,000 jobs over the next few years, while opponents claim it will destroy almost that many jobs. Is the rationale for what has eventually been labelled “a vanity endeavour” still applicable in a post-Covid world? Buildingspecifier.com’s Joe Bradbury discusses:

High Speed 2 (HS2) is currently being funded unwillingly by taxpayers throughout the United Kingdom. The proposals for it were made public in 2010, near the end of the previous Labour administration, and the first phase is scheduled to open in 2026. Yet, it is both over budget and behind schedule. Toxic mix… Nevertheless, opposition to the project is growing, owing to its poor economic case, negative environmental consequences, and better suggestions as to how to spend the money set up for HS2.

A study conducted by the ITV Tonight programme back in 2016 discovered that:

  • Only 15% felt that HS2 is worth £56bn
  • 58% didn’t think it’s a price worth paying
  • 77% of people would prefer that the money was spent in other areas, like the NHS
  • Nearly three-quarters of people thought HS2 would lead to price rises for train tickets
  • 60% said they would not pay more to ride on HS2
  • Only 7% would be prepared to pay increased prices for the high speed line
  • 80% said they felt sympathy for people who may lose their homes to HS2, even though they may be compensated
  • A mere 11% of people thought the high speed rail link would actually benefit the majority of commuters

 

That was 7 years ago. Since then, it has even harder to build a case for HS2.

For many years, politicians insisted that HS2 was on time and within budget. Skeptics referred to the Elizabeth Line (previously Crossrail), which appeared to be “on time and on budget” until a few months before it was scheduled to begin. This all changed in a matter of months, with billions added to the Crossrail budget. Worse, the launch date was pushed out from December 2018 to possibly 2021 in the summer of 2018.

Now, according to the HS2 website, Phase One will open sometime between 2029 and 2033… so place your bets!

Spiralling costs

Transport Secretary Grant Shapps published the Stocktake document by incoming HS2 Ltd Chair Allen Cook at the start of the Parliamentary term. This confirmed what opponents Stop HS2 had long predicted: HS2’s expenses and schedule were woefully behind schedule.

Parliament had been told by ministers that the budget for HS2 was £55bn. However the cost for HS2 officially went from £55bn in 2015 prices to £81-£88bn in 2019 prices (£72-78bn in 2015 prices).

When a new high speed railway was first presented as an alternative to expanding Heathrow airport, the suggestions were that this would cost about £18billion. However when the HS2 proposal was firmed up and made public, Phases 1 and 2 were expected to cost £33billion in total, with Phase 1 opening in 2026 and Phase 2 in 2033. By 2013, this had risen to £42 billion, excluding the cost of the trains. A further review set the funding envelope for delivery of the full HS2 scheme of £55.7bn at 2015 prices.

The overall cost of completing HS2 has now ballooned from £33bn a decade ago to an estimated £100bn in 2023. That’s almost double the original quote, and significantly more than the £18bn posited at its first suggestion.

Bad for the environment

Despite their best efforts to dress HS2 up as an ecologically sound project, the environmental case for HS2 fails to hold water; the operation of HS2 will cause increasing carbon emissions, well into the 22nd century, in addition to any embedded carbon from construction. There will be negligible modal shift from cars and planes, there will be massive damage to the natural environment, including sensitive wildlife sites and HS2 Ltd’s mitigation efforts are failing.

Even when HS2 was first suggested, the carbon case was at most neutral, with the operation of HS2 potentially balancing the carbon cost of construction over decades. Yet, things have deteriorated substantially since then.

Building HS2 will result in embedded carbon emissions, which HS2 Ltd predicted in 2019 to be roughly 1,451,000 tCO2e tonnes.

However, as of February 2019, the carbon case massively worsened, with the latest figures from HS2 Ltd showing that after 120 years of operations, HS2 would be increasing carbon emissions rather than reducing them.

Habitat destruction

HS2 Ltd has not given a comprehensive list of wildlife locations that will be directly or indirectly impacted by HS2, however it is known to number in the hundreds.

An examination by the Independent on Sunday way back in 2013 discovered that Phases 1 and 2 had already affected over 350 sites: they reported: “Among the sites that could be directly damaged or indirectly affected are a national nature reserve, 10 county wildlife trust reserves, about 50 ancient woods, 30 river corridors, 24 Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs, the highest level of protection) and hundreds of other wildlife habitats. Among the rare or scarce species at risk are the small blue butterfly, long-eared owl, stag beetle, great crested newt, purple hairstreak butterfly and Bechstein’s bat.”

More recently than the IoS report, the Wildlife Trusts condemned the HS2 Phase 2b draft Environmental Statement saying: “HS2 Ltd’s own figures for the latest phase of the Phase 2b route show it will have a devastating impact on important places for wild plants and animals. 12 highly protected areas for nature conservation known as Sites of Special Scientific Interest, 111 Local Wildlife Sites and 19 ancient woodlands will be seriously damaged.

“HS2 Ltd’s work on this latest phase of the HS2 route is derisory in its assessment of the environmental impact. It is incomplete, there isn’t enough detail, there are significant omissions, it lacks sufficient proposals to compensate for nature’s loss, and to make matters even worse, there’s very little information about the impact on species. On the evidence, we have been given, this phase will result in an unacceptable level of damage to wildlife along the route.”

The Independent also reported on effects from the operation of HS2, saying “The toll on individual animals will be great. A Spanish study found that high-speed trains kill about 36 animals per kilometre. If that was applied to both phases of HS2, this would result in some 20,000 mammals, reptiles and amphibians being killed on the line every year.”

Even their best efforts are a blunder

Even where HS2 Ltd has attempted to prevent animal loss, it has failed to do so. Here are a few examples:

  • Trees planted in 2018 to replace destroyed woods were allowed to die, according to HS2, because watering them was too expensive.
  • To build a “biodiversity zone,” HS2 Ltd destroyed an existing County Wildlife Park.
  • Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust (BBOWT) barred HS2 contractors from entering Calvert Jubilee Nature Reserve because HS2 planned to destroy wildlife habitat before replacing it, leaving wildlife with nowhere to go in the meanwhile. Luckily BBOWT were there…

In summary

I always try to keep an open mind, but it’s impossible to remain neutral on a topic as divisive as HS2. It appears that in 2023 (13 years after HS2 was conceived), it is significantly easier to argue against HS2 than for it. How alarming then, that this fact doesn’t seem to make a jot of difference to the outcome. We’re getting it… whether we like it or not.

…Are we truly that powerless? In spite of widespread objection from the British public and multiple members of parliament, the project ploughs ahead; through fields, pastures, homes, gardens, habitats and nature reserves. Will it all be worth it? Or are we tearing our country and its economy to shreds?

/0 Comments/by

EARTHQUAKES – A CONSTRUCTION PERSPECTIVE

On 6 February 2023, a Mw 7.8 earthquake struck Turkey and Syria. It was followed by a Mw 7.7 earthquake nine hours later, centred 95 km (59 mi) to the north–northeast from the first, in Kahramanmaraş Province. There was widespread damage and tens of thousands of fatalities.

It was the deadliest earthquake worldwide since the 2010 Haiti earthquake and fifth-deadliest earthquake of the 21st century. As of 21 February 2023, over 48,900 deaths have been confirmed; over 42,300 in Turkey, and over 6,600 in Syria… and building regulations aren’t being adhered to?? Buildingspecifier.com’s Joe Bradbury investigates:

Earthquakes cost lives. They also cost money. LOT’S of it. Collectively, the latest earthquakes across Turkey and Syria are estimated to have caused US$84.1 billion worth of damage, making them the fourth-costliest earthquakes on record. Coupled with that, it is also the deadliest natural disaster in Turkey’s modern history.

Whilst people are still being pulled from the rubble, the rest of the world watches, reeling – how did this happen and what could we have done to lessen the fatal outcome?

The sight of newly built apartments toppling during the carnage has stirred much heartbreak and outrage, especially within the global construction community. The fact that even some of the newest residential buildings in Turkey and Syria have crumbled to dust has raised serious concerns about current building safety regulations in those countries.

Afterall, buildings should be able to resist quakes of this magnitude thanks to modern construction techniques. And regulations enacted in the aftermath of prior tragedies in the country were supposed to ensure that these safeguards were in place.

Although the quakes were strong, experts within the field are now saying that well-built buildings should have been able to withstand them. So why did so many topple, taking thousands of people with them?

Speaking on the subject, Prof David Alexander, an expert in emergency planning and management at University College London recently told the BBC “In most places the level of shaking was less than the maximum, so we can conclude out of the thousands of buildings that collapsed, almost all of them don’t stand up to any reasonably expected earthquake construction code.”

Why aren’t building regulations being enforced?

Following earlier disasters, such as the 1999 earthquake that devastated the city of Izmit in Turkey’s northwestern region, construction restrictions have actually been strengthened. Yet, it is now coming to light that the legislation,(including the most recent requirements established in 2018) have thus far been poorly enforced.

In Turkey, for example, the government has offered periodic “building amnesties,” which are effectively legal exemptions from paying a charge for structures built without the necessary safety certificates. They have been in effect since the 1960s (with the latest in 2018).

Opponents have long cautioned that such amnesties increase the likelihood of disaster in the case of a severe earthquake. According to Pelin Pnar Giritliolu, Istanbul chairman of the Union of Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architects’ Chamber of City Planners, up to 75,000 buildings in the devastated earthquake zone in southern Turkey have been granted construction amnesties.

We can do better

Thankfully, other countries take their responsibilities more seriously and stand as a shining example for the benefits of adhering to code. Japan is one such example; where millions of people live in densely populated high-rise buildings despite the country’s history of severe earthquakes. Japan alone demonstrates how construction codes can assist in keeping people safe during just such catastrophes.

Building safety criteria vary depending on a building’s usage and proximity to earthquake-prone areas: from simple reinforcing to motion dampers throughout the structure to installing the entire structure on top of a massive shock absorber to isolate it from ground movement.

The relationship between a building and an earthquake

We’ve built magnificent structures and cities throughout history, only for them to be destroyed by natural forces. Earthquakes are one of the most devastating forces on Earth; seismic waves travelling through the ground can demolish structures, kill people, and cost enormous sums of money in loss and repair.

According to the National Earthquake Information Centre, 20,000 earthquakes occur each year, with 16 of them being catastrophic disasters.

Engineers have introduced new designs and building materials over the last few decades to better equip structures to resist earthquakes.

Before delving into the characteristics of earthquake-proof buildings, it’s critical to understand how earthquakes affect man-made structures. When an earthquake happens, shockwaves are sent throughout the ground in brief, quick intervals that stretch in all directions. While structures are normally designed to withstand vertical forces caused by their weight and gravity, they are not designed to withstand side-to-side pressures caused by earthquakes.

This horizontal movement causes vibrations in the walls, floors, columns, beams, and connectors that keep them all together. The movement disparity between the bottom and top of structures causes enormous stress, causing the supporting frame to break and the entire structure to collapse.

How to construct earthquake-safe buildings

Engineers labour to reinforce the structure and counteract the forces of a probable earthquake when designing an earthquake-proof building. Because earthquakes generate energy that pulls buildings in one direction, the technique entails having the building push in the other direction. Here are several strategies for making structures more earthquake resistant.

  1. Lay moving foundations

The structure is built on flexible pads that insulate the foundation from the earth. When an earthquake strikes, just the foundation shifts, while the building retains its structural integrity.

  1. Use shock absorbers

Tuned dampers mounted to beams transform motion into heat and absorb stress by using pistons and oil. This is accomplished through the use of two methods – vibrational control devices and pendulum power.

  1. Strengthen the structure of the building

Buildings must disperse forces that go through them during a seismic event in order to withstand collapse. Shear walls, cross braces, diaphragms, and moment-resisting frames are essential for building reinforcement.

  1. Use earthquake-resistant materials

The different forms of structural steel allow it to bend without breaking. Wood is a lightweight and bendable material with a high weight-to-strength ratio. Contemporary materials have the ability to be more flexible and shape-retaining.

In summary

Earthquakes are a powerful, destructive, and unexpected force that may demolish buildings, destroy towns, and put construction companies’ labour to the test. Certain areas of the world are more vulnerable to earthquakes than others, and these cities, towns, communities, and urban centres must safeguard themselves and their citizens from these natural disasters.

Governments must follow and enforce building codes; failing to do so results in blood on their hands.

The most difficult aspect of preparing for earthquakes is that no one knows when one will occur or how large it will be. Current measurement and detection technology can assist us in being better prepared for them. Building-resistant material advancements have also improved the construction industry’s ability to build for earthquakes.

The construction industry is perfectly positioned to take use of current technology that has the potential to save both lives and cities.

 

/0 Comments/by

10 construction innovations that have transformed the industry

It’s been around 2.5 million years since the Stone Age, when people lived in caves and used tools made of various sorts of stone. We have witnessed tremendous exploits in the realm of building innovation throughout the evolution of humanity – and possibly the highlights of the construction revolution have occurred within the last 40 years. Joe Bradbury of Buildingspecifier.com examines the top ten construction inventions of our time to reveal our outstanding technological heritage:

1. Mechanisation

To truly comprehend the revolutionary impact of mechanisation, we must go back a great deal further than 40 years.

The introduction of hydraulic and pneumatic devices in the mid to late nineteenth century was a truly astonishing innovation for our species, leading to the development of earth-moving equipment and other gear that are today standard in our business. These nineteenth-century technologies have greatly reduced the time and effort required for large-scale undertakings.

Fast forward to the early twentieth century, when mechanisation began to exhibit more advanced functioning and capacities. We introduced cherry pickers, concrete mixers, cranes, and power tools around this time. During this period, the internal-combustion engine appeared, replacing hand shovels, wheelbarrows, and working animals with forklifts, tractors, and bulldozers.

2. Prefabrication and Construction Industrialization

It can be challenging to assemble huge sophisticated components on-site, exposed to the elements, piece by piece. Off-site fabrication has significantly boosted the efficiency of this process.

A huge heat exchanger built in a vendor’s shop, for example, will not only arrive on site ready to plug in, but will also benefit from better management of components and material inventories, as well as increased efficiency and production. The return on investment rises, while waste and inefficiency decrease.

When components such as concrete insulated panels, timber frame panels, pump units, compressors, and instrument panels are manufactured in a factory rather than on-site, significant time savings are realised.

3. Computer-Aided Design (CAD) (CAD)

During the height of the Middle Ages, architects, draughtsmen, master stonemasons, and builders produced some of the world’s most stunning buildings employing ground-breaking design and construction technologies.

These approaches remained mostly unaltered for several centuries. However, in the latter half of the twentieth century, computer-aided design (CAD) appeared, permanently altering construction – for the first time, disagreements during the design process were rendered evident.

Previously, issues such as separate systems, electrical conduits and high-voltage alternating current ducting for example, competing for the same physical space bedevilled architects and builders, with their two-dimensional plans and section drawings.

4. Building Information Modelling (BIM)

While computer-aided design (CAD) revolutionised the role of designers, Building Information Modelling (BIM) has proven to be astonishingly versatile, allowing architects, engineers, contractors, and subcontractors to collaborate on the fine details of design and construction by using the same database and computer model.

All project stakeholders collaborate on a detailed 3D model that incorporates all of a structure’s functional systems – such as pavement or curbs, beams and girders, HVAC and electrical installations, as well as the aesthetics of walls, arches, roofs, and railings.

Because BIM is a collaborative process from start to finish, it enables all preconstruction partners to visualise and analyse design decisions, as well as identify interferences and other problems, before work begins on site.

Working cooperatively saves contractors countless resources because building does not begin until all parties have submitted their plans, guaranteeing disputes are found and corrected quickly, easily, and ahead of the ground being broken on site.

5. Mobile Devices

In various different ways, mobile technology has drastically altered the construction sector. One of the most significant for contractors is the improvement in project management. All parties involved can collaborate utilising the same consolidated information sources via smartphones and tablets, ensuring that no one is left out of the loop, no matter where they are.

Real-time analytics in construction have also been made possible by mobile devices. Instead of needing to write a report at the end of the day, foremen may now keep track of performance, conditions, and costs throughout the day utilising reporting tools. Project managers can use mobile business information to predict necessary modifications, allowing them to respond immediately to keep things on track and within budget. Plus, reporting apps ensure that all stakeholders have access.

6. Robotic Total Stations

Traditionally, a team uses building drawings plus a tape measure, spirit level, and theodolite – a precision equipment for calculating angles – to find attachment sites for things like cable trays and pipework.

This approach, however, does not function well with more complex structures. It is time-consuming and labour-intensive, with a large margin for error that can result in major implications such as confrontations with other construction services and prefabricated systems that do not fit, wasting time, money, and materials.

Enter the Robotic Total Station (RTS), an electronic theodolite with an electronic distance measurement that can be controlled remotely from a distance. The layout can be accomplished by a single person using a tablet equipped with the necessary software, with RTS ensuring higher efficiency, improved accuracy, fewer mistakes, and less paperwork, as well as lower labour expenses.

7. Eco-Friendly Building Materials

As the construction sector seeks ways to cut carbon emissions, it is turning to more sustainable building methods. This includes the use of environmentally friendly building materials such as Cross-Laminated Timber, salvaged wood, bamboo, recycled rubber, and a variety of other novel materials. Consider a construction made of straw bales, rammed earth, Hempcrete (a concrete-like substance manufactured from hemp), or ferrock (concrete-like material made from steel dust); some of these materials absorb and trap carbon dioxide, indicating that they are carbon-neutral.

Using sustainable building materials benefits the environment while also lowering construction costs, improving structural energy efficiency, and increasing property value. The reduction in operational costs reduces overall building costs by 5 to 15%, depending on the green material utilised. In some locations, there are also regulatory incentives that make sustainable building more appealing.

Buildings that are created in a sustainable manner are in high demand. They frequently have higher occupancy rates and rental prices than traditional-built structures. Green construction materials may also benefit occupant health. Green construction is a win-win-win situation for the industry, the residents, and the earth.

8. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

While personal protective equipment (PPE) is significantly less technologically advanced than the other items on this list, there is no doubt that it has helped to revolutionise the construction industry in terms of health and safety during the previous 40 years.

Protective apparel has gradually evolved as the hazards encountered by construction workers have increased.

For decades, the high-vis jacket and hard hat have been the cornerstones of construction site safety apparel. This will remain the case, but new technologies are on the horizon that will expand the capabilities of protective garments to provide better safety and extra services to their users going forward.

9. Cloud Computing

Cloud computing is at the heart of the digital construction revolution. Prior to cloud computing, project data was constrained by hardware constraints. You may now outsource data processing and storage to powerful devices that are available from anywhere. As a result, there is nearly limitless storage and a totally connected workplace.

Real-time data is made available to all stakeholders by leveraging the power of cloud computing, allowing for easy sharing and collaboration. The team is no longer dependent on time-consuming in-person status checks and device storage capabilities.

For contractors, storing project data in the cloud is a no-brainer. According to a survey conducted by the Associated General Contractors of America in partnership with Sage Construction and Real Estate, 85% of contractors have implemented or planned to implement cloud solutions. Cloud computing not only simplifies data storage and access, but it also safeguards you against data loss, damage, or theft. Secure cloud storage protects data while increasing team accessibility.

10. Digital Twins and As-Builts

Despite the fact that the phrase “digital twins” was coined in 2002, the notion of digital twins and digital as-builts has been in use for decades. NASA was among the first to employ a variant of the technique in the 1960s. To avert additional calamity, engineers tried solutions on a digital duplicate of Apollo 13.

As project teams move away from manual, time-consuming paperwork, the usage of digital twins is expanding in the construction sector. A digital twin, also known as a digital as-built, is a virtual counterpart of a physical object that provides real-time data throughout the development and maintenance processes. These computer representations can be used to anticipate carbon footprints, simulate situations, and collect real-time data via sensors installed in the environment.

Considering the Future

What is the future of construction technology? Keep an eye on this space to find out – buildingspecifier.com is dedicated to keeping you informed of industry developmen

/0 Comments/by

Attention! The construction industry needs you

It’s no secret that the construction industry is experiencing a severe skills shortage. The business has long been plagued by a scarcity of experienced labour, making meeting deadlines more challenging than ever. Now, according to a new study, more than a third of students have ruled out a future in construction. What’s happening and how can we overcome it? Buildingspecifier.com’s Joe Bradbury discusses:

I’d like to start by stating that I do not intent for this piece to exude negativity, for I have faith in the hardworking professionals and unsung heroes of construction; they have already achieved so much in changing things for the better throughout the course of the last decade, and I remain hopeful that things are moving in the right direction…

…however, there’s no easy way to put this – alarmingly, according to a poll of nearly 4,000 adults over the age of 16 who are currently enrolled in high school, college, or university, 37% would never consider working in the construction sector.

In fact, students were also revealed to more critical of construction when asked their opinions on 17 different industries. Almost half of female respondents claimed they would not work in construction.

Only 5% of the students asked were actively contemplating professions in the industry, compared to 38% of those seeking careers in professional, scientific, and technical activities.

This saddens me after years of keeping my eyes professionally on the wide sprawling and richly varied construction industry. I have seen such vision, such innovation and enthusiasm. I have felt an express desire to deliver the built environment that is deserved and to be proud of. For me, the sector is teaming with inspiration, and if this is failing to be picked up by the next generation, I feel this must be due to a failure to present and communicate ourselves as an industry. We have the goods, we just need to get it across.

Only then, can we attract the type of budding talent that can evoke change.

Nevertheless, the results of the study, conducted by data specialist Savanta ComRes and published by consultancy WSP, should not be ignored.

How can we improve our situation?

Discussing the results of the study, WSP executive director Rachel Skinner stated, “We can’t keep doing things the same way we always have if we want to successfully address the various elements of the critical climate crisis.”

“Having the necessary skills in sufficient strength, breadth, and depth is critical if the UK is to capitalise on the chance to improve economic growth and build new knowledge through the climate transition.”

The research showed that this could be an “uphill struggle”, she said, adding: “While today’s students have grasped the crucial importance of the engineering and infrastructure sectors in securing a lower-carbon future, many of them do not view these sectors as prime targets for their own future employment.

“This leads to key questions: how can we change this perspective? What more can we do to accelerate the development of a workforce with the right skills to deliver against the UK’s net-zero commitments?”

Only half of the students polled believed their generation could have a significant impact on environmental and climate change challenges, and fewer than two in five were confident in their comprehension of the term “green jobs.” And therein lies the rub.

According to two recent surveys, the industry’s skills shortfall has reached “alarming proportions,” with 75% of civil engineering firms finding it difficult to attract experienced employees and 96% of supply chain companies grappling with net-zero capabilities.

The Office for National Statistics revealed also that there were 49,000 unfilled construction job vacancies in September alone.

Coupled with this, the average age of the construction workforce is presently 50-56, with an increase in early retirement seen since the beginning of 2020. This adds a sense of urgency to the problem, gradually increasing the skills shortage into a pending crisis.

We need more people, people!

According to a report by the Construction Skills Network (CSN), the construction industry would require almost a quarter-million additional workers by 2026 to meet the expanding demands in the UK building sector. Many employees have departed the UK as a result of Brexit, and some businesses have been downsizing throughout the pandemic. As a result, many construction firms are now experiencing a skilled labour shortage, which will disproportionately effect private housing, infrastructure, repair, and maintenance.

What can we do about it?

If we want to grow our businesses and bridge the skills gap, there are several things we can do to increase our chances of attracting and retaining high-quality employees going forward.

Provide opportunities for advancement in jobs

Young people want a future. So it’s critical to provide advancement opportunities in the roles we advertise, and to clearly express to prospective applicants how they may push themselves and climb the ladder within the industry. When you have great employees, it is critical to allow them to go into other positions and make your company the place where they want to advance their careers. This can mean the difference between employees leaving after a short amount of time and employees staying with the company for many years.

This is not only good for employee morale, but it also means that we will be able to keep personnel long enough to reap the benefits of their experience indefinitely. This will result in a workforce that is knowledgeable, experienced, and talented, allowing the industry to flourish into the future and contribute to its reputation. By promoting talented employees, we will be able to reduce the number of employees we have to hire from outside sources, lowering expenses and time spent.

Look after the workforce

While we obviously want to prioritise projects, deadlines, and profits, it’s equally critical to keep employees happy and satisfied at work. Once you’ve recruited exceptional people to your firm, it’s critical to assist them enjoy their roles while also allowing them to advance, so they may thrive and produce the best results for your organisation. Workers want to feel respected and heard at work, therefore establishing a strong line of command in management is critical. It also serves as a welcoming and warm face for new employees, allowing them to get up and running right away.

When things get hectic and deadlines approach, remember to take the time to listen to your employees’ suggestions and recognise their accomplishments. Employee of the Month programmes and mentions in company newsletters are excellent ways to reward employees and make them feel valued and appreciated for their efforts. Smaller things like company socials and celebrating staff birthdays or work anniversaries are also great extra touches to make every worker feel appreciated and welcome.

Widen the search

Try broadening your recruitment process by speaking at schools and colleges about available placements and programs. Some students might not think about taking on a career in construction due to the lack of representation, so some encouragement and information can be all they need to get interested. Sending a diverse representation from your company into these establishments can immediately make a difference too, and this might encourage applications to your company from young people of a variety of backgrounds.

In summary

If the building sector is to provide three million new social homes over the next 20 years to address the housing crisis and address the 11,000+ homes throughout the UK that have been empty for 10 years or more, it must have a dedicated and capable workforce.

Ultimately, the best way to attract new talent so sorely needed by the industry today is to make sure the construction industry is a positive place to be. Ergo: If you build it, they will come!

/0 Comments/by

Climate change will shift the way we build

Did you know that 2020 was one of the warmest, as well as one of the wettest and sunniest, on record? Weather in the UK is becoming increasingly unpredictable and scientists state that extreme weather will affect Britain more regularly as a result of climate change. Is moderate British weather rapidly becoming a thing of the past? How will this affect construction? MMC Editor Joe Bradbury discusses:

 

The climate in the UK is already shifting. The degree of warming observed in Britain is generally consistent with what is also being observed globally, indicating that our overall environment is becoming both wetter and warmer.

Weather records

The UK’s weather records date back hundreds of years. We’ve been keeping track. For example, a series of temperatures for central England goes back to 1659, while other temperature records reach back as far as 1884. Analysis of this enormous body of data shows that the most recent 30-year period (1993-2022) is 0.9C warmer than the earlier 30-year period (1963 to 1992), and the UK has had an average 6% increase in rainfall over the more recent period.

Long-standing industry studies have shown that the UK’s unpredictable weather can cause disruption and delay to construction projects. Could this be another incentive for the building sector to embrace Modern Methods of Construction, which offers a more reliable environment in the face of more erratic and sometimes dangerous weather conditions?

Increasingly erratic conditions

The recent heat wave has been unwelcome (to put it mildly) in a sector that has faced challenge after challenge in recent years and aspires to return to pre-Covid levels of production.

Although there is currently no established legal limit on how high outdoor temperatures can be beforework ceases, companies nevertheless have a duty of care to their staff. Dehydration, lightheadedness, fainting, heat stroke and an increase in the risk of skin cancer can all be brought on by excessive heat and sun exposure. The previous notion of making hay whilst the sun shines is now being thrown into repute.

Historically, the building industry has always benefitted from the UK’s dry summer months. However, if our summers are to get hotter and heatwaves to become more commonplace, do we anticipate a time when outdoor temperatures and conditions may impede proceedings? Indeed, some trade unions are already calling for restrictions on allowing workers to be exposed to high outside temperatures – as well as low.

It isn’t just the summer that is expected to be affected. Although UK’s average annual temperature will (and is) rising due to global warming, this does not indicate that all of our seasons will get warmer. In fact, most climatologists believe that future winters in the UK will be colder and harsher, in spite of summers being significantly hotter.

The climate in Britain is becoming significantly wetter than in the past, as a result of the globe warming. This is due to the effect of greenhouse gases on our atmosphere.

Because greater greenhouse gas concentrations warm the air and increase the moisture that feeds storms, extremely rainy periods and the accompanying flooding are getting worse. UK infrastructure was not designed to withstand the type of rainfall, heatwave temperatures, cold spells and storms that are anticipated to occur more regularly; these extremes are likely to pose increasingly serious issues as time progresses.

How weather impacts construction

Rainy weather can result in a variety of delays and problems. Severe storms and strong winds can exacerbate already difficult operating circumstances. A building site may experience delays due to storms with strong winds. We are forced to avoid utilising lifting machinery or equipment while gales are blowing because the wind can make it harder to work safely and efficiently and can increase the quantity of dust being thrown around.

A building site is also significantly more affected by the cold than you might initially believe. In addition to being hazardous for the employees, these conditions can also influence the machinery, creating a variety of hazards on a building site with the introduction of ice and frost. The placement of foundations, slabs, and brickwork is slowed down by the need to wait longer for concrete to set in colder weather, which adds time to the total schedule. The cold might also have an influence on our supply chain, in addition to the building site itself.

When working on a building site, dry and warm weather that is neither too hot nor too cold and devoid of rain is ideal. However, this poses its own set of issues if it becomes overly hot and dry. It can be hazardous for your workforce to operate in the hot sun. Additionally, dry heat can increase the amount of dust and airborne filth, which is hazardous for your employees to breathe in and can harm some equipment, clog filters and reduce overall efficiency.

It’s also crucial to take into account the effect on the site and the materials. Extreme heat can have an impact on a wide variety of materials, including concrete and brick. For example, if the bricks get too dry, they can weaken the masonry and generally lower the quality of a building.

The benefits of MMC

Due to less reliance on HGVs, the geographic concentration of MMC personnel within one or fewer facilities, and a decrease in pollution and waste, the advantages of MMC are frequently future-focused and centred on the reduction of emissions.

The recent heatwave has brought the consequences of not adopting MMC to high enough a level into stark view.

Efficiency is something MMC can provide for the industry, and according to the NHBC, 81% of developers feel that this is a major element in the adoption of MMC processes. When it comes to building processes and materials, the ability to maintain consistent climate and conditions within factory-controlled environments means that the properties of materials do not change, e.g. timber does not swell due to moisture, cement and bonding agents are able to set, etc., so the manufacturing process is unaffected along with a reduction in material waste.

At the human level, days lost due to weather (rain, wind, snow, or heat on any particular day) can be written off, negating the risks associated with working outside, a factor that is expected to worsen again as temperatures become increasingly volatile.

Buildings fit for our future

It is more crucial than ever that our structures, especially our homes, can function as they were intended to as we adjust to a world with colder winters, warmer summers, droughts, and floods. That raises the issue of workmanship quality; if passive cooling or thermal efficiency techniques need on tolerances that cannot be met, there is little use in an architect creating them. MMC has an additional advantage in that it delivers a more predictable product with fewer flaws because to the production procedures and, ultimately, superior quality control.

In summary

 

Now’s the time to give MMC and the advantages it provides the care and consideration they deserve as the industry seems to face one issue after another. It is true that MMC is not always the greatest option for a project, and traditional building techniques will always have their place. However, we’re setting ourselves up for a fall if we do not pay attention to the changing environment we find ourselves operating within. Let’s deliver a built environment to be proud of; one that serves us well in uncertain times.
/0 Comments/by

Drawing positives from the pandemic

Optimists often say that every cloud has a silver lining. Despite the fact that Covid-19’s effects are still being felt throughout the world more than two years later, a new industry analysis suggests that, tragedy aside, the epidemic has left the UK construction industry with some beneficial side effects. Buildingspecifier.com Editor Joe Bradbury investigates:

Are you a glass-half-empty person, or a glass-half-full? In other words, can you draw any positives from tragedy that might make undergoing the suffering less meaningless? What have we learned about ourselves and one another throughout the coronavirus crisis that might help us forge a path into a brave new world, post-COVID?

A rare disaster in the form of a pandemic temporarily brought the world to its knees. Countries have spent the last couple of years scrabbling to fight an invisible enemy, as the world went in lockdown. The subsequent collapse in activity that has resulted from this is unlike anything experienced in living memory; the word ‘unprecedented’ is bandied about in daily parlance.

Every cloud…

Despite the fact that Covid-19’s effects are still being felt more than two years later, the UK construction industry may have actually benefited from the epidemic, according to a new analysis from the Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB).

The report, titled “Learning from the Covid-19 pandemic to strengthen the construction industry,” examines how changes made during the pandemic in the sector have helped resolve long-standing problems, such as cooperation and communication between contractors and clients, flexible work schedules, payment procedures, and employee wellbeing.

It uses the construction of Nightingale hospitals as an illustration of how more effective teamwork, communication, and flexible working on a scale not generally associated with the construction business, led to projects being finished in just nine days. Lessons learned from such projects, according to the CIOB, must continue to develop the construction sector for everyone involved—not just the people who work in it.

Daisie Rees-Evans, Policy and public affairs officer at CIOB, said “Covid-19 had a monumental impact on people’s lives and livelihoods with businesses needing to adapt how they operate to keep their workers safe while staying financially afloat. Since the outbreak of the virus in the UK, we have seen a shift in business practices with construction seeing large improvements in supply-chain collaboration, access to hygiene facilities and provision for worker wellbeing.

“Our report reflects on the progress that’s already been made and what further opportunities can be harnessed to deliver change that positively impacts construction businesses, workers and the communities they build for. With the UK Government committing to procuring for social value, the publication of our report is timely in its approach to seek true cultural change.”

Being paid on time

In a recent CIOB survey of 1,400 construction SMEs, more than half reported that since the pandemic struck, payment times, hygiene facilities, and mental health support had improved. Temporary measures that had been put in place to keep the industry operating safely during lockdown have since become routine, according to these respondents.

Overall, 52% of survey participants reported seeing a reduction in the amount of time it takes for clients to pay them since the outbreak, with more than half reporting that they now receive payments in 40 days or fewer. In 2017, the Federation of Master Builders (FMB) conducted a poll that revealed less than one-third of construction SMEs received payment from clients or large contractors within 30 days, and nearly one-quarter had to wait more than four months.

Although this is a step in the right direction, the CIOB research shows that the majority of SMEs still prioritise reducing payment terms to under 30 days, supporting CIOB’s recommendation in the report for the Government to review its Prompt Payment Code. The code was updated in the middle of the pandemic in 2021 to guarantee that individuals who signed up compensated small businesses within 30 days, but signing up is still optional, and as of January this year, there were only 3,500 signatories.

Paul Singh, Commercial director at project and programme management consultancy, EEDN, commented: “The pandemic has definitely increased collaboration and empathy within the industry from clients to consultants and contractors, opening up dialogue and reducing the adversarial approach.

“Construction has really taken note of the need to prioritise mental health and wellbeing. Projects are now defined with a new, hybrid way of working in mind and spaces have wellbeing built right into them.

“We have also seen greater proactivity when it comes to invoicing and payments, with invoices often being settled before the payment period is up. There is undoubtedly still a lot of work to be done but the signs are certainly encouraging.”

In summary

What we have just been through as a nation is unprecedented. Brexit and the election, once permanently on everybody’s lips were replaced with a chronic sense of fear and uncertainty. We still don’t fully know how this will affect construction over the coming years and decades, but we do know that the impact will be felt. In order to build ourselves back up, we will need to put our differences aside and work collectively as an industry.

Putting builders at the heart of apprenticeship development and training will unlock additional high-quality opportunities for young people and help Britain get back on its feet. We need an army of builders to help deliver the new homes that this country desperately needs. They will also upgrade our existing homes to make them more energy efficient and fit for purpose in the years ahead.

/0 Comments/by