The Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) has welcomed an apparently dramatic improvement in the payment habits of main contractors.

About half of large construction firms now claim to be paying their sub-contractors within 30 days or fewer, according to new data gathered by their trade body BuildUK.

While some firms are paying in under 25 days, BuildUK said there was still a small number of poor performers, but that the general improvement in average payment of invoices among the country’s top 34 large contractors had allayed fears that the pandemic would prompt a return to bad habits.

The survey showed that the average payment period had improved by four days in the last six months to 30.4 days, which means sub-contractors are being paid on average 15 days faster than when Build UK first started gathering payment data in July 2018.

Build UK’s deputy chief executive Jo Fautley said this three-year improvement proved that “construction is serious about changing the way it does business.”

BESA added that it was pleased to see progress on what had been a major problem for SMEs and urged main contractors and other large construction players to keep up the momentum to bring down payment periods still further.

“Late payment has been a severe drain on cash flow in our sector for many years forcing a number of perfectly well run companies out of business,” said the Association’s director of legal and commercial Debbie Petford.

Challenging 
“Building services firms are facing challenging conditions created by rising inflation and supply issues, so keeping the cash flowing is more crucial than ever – particularly for smaller businesses.

“There is plenty of work out there and our members are, generally, seeing turnover moving in the right direction, but that makes it even more important that they get paid on time so they can continue to invest in people and processes to be able to deliver projects promptly and on budget.”

BESA also said the Reporting on Payment Practices and Performance regulations introduced by the government in 2017 had played a crucial part in improving the situation but should now be updated to maintain progress. The Association contributed to a sector-wide response led by the umbrella body Actuate UK to a BEIS consultation on changes to the regulations, which revealed that some companies were now “gaming the system”.

“The regulations have been transformative, but it is important that the reporting process is now updated to reflect the value of the payments – not just the number and volume of transactions,” explained Petford.

“Compliance by value is much more important than compliance by volume, particularly for SMEs. However, it should not be difficult to update the reporting mechanism to achieve this because the processes are now largely automated.

“Without this change, the data will become increasing obsolete because high volumes of low value transactions can be used to distort the true picture and disguise the fact that large amounts of credit remain outstanding,” said Petford.

Scotland’s Economy Secretary Kate Forbes said: “Scotland has a rich history of innovative manufacturers and so as we look to grasp the many opportunities of achieving net zero, the establishment of internationally competitive clusters of excellence will help us create new green jobs, deliver a just transition and support our economic transformation.

“We can only seize Scotland’s economic potential if we create secure, sustainable and satisfying jobs that also help build a fairer, more prosperous economy for everyone.”

Responding to the announcement, Alan James, Founder of Storegga, Lead Developer of the Acorn CCS project in Scotland, said: “The new Scottish green freeports are an important step towards meeting our net zero commitments in the UK.

“Scotland could become a world leader in green hydrogen production from offshore wind and a net importer of liquid carbon dioxide for permanent storage in the North Sea, recycling existing high tech oil and gas infrastructure.

“Scotland is uniquely placed to transition its oil and gas skills and existing industry to help the rest of the UK and Europe decarbonise.”

 

Source: Energy Live News

Andrew Carpenter, CEO of CESW

Constructing Excellence South West (CESW), a member led organisation covering the region, has launched a report exploring how to attract younger generations to a career in an ageing industry.

 

With almost half of employees in construction aged between 45 and 65, the Constructing the Future report outlines detailed recommendations to help evolve the industry to ensure it’s filled with new talent, skills, ideas and ways of working.

 

Designed to drive real change and combat the ongoing skills shortage, the report examines the current issues surrounding recruiting the next generation, and explores how to engage with and encourage school leavers to consider a career in construction and engineering.

 

The Generation for Change South West (G4CSW) is the sub-group of CESW responsible for implementing the recommendations listed in the Constructing the Future report. As the professional voice of young people in the UK built environment, G4CSW is committed to engage with the future leaders of the industry to show them the range of opportunities that lie ahead.

 

Andrew Carpenter, CEO of CESW, said: “Our latest report closely examines the existing issues surrounding the recruitment of the next generation of construction employees. It explores the attitudes and perceptions which influence career decisions and highlights the barriers which may be stopping younger people from applying for a career in construction and engineering.

 

“By reviewing the schemes already in place, G4CSW has developed a more effective, targeted and creative approach which is more likely to resonate with school leavers as they begin planning their futures.

 

“With an aging workforce, now is the time to make a real difference and provide an industry of opportunity for the next generation. Further action must be taken to recruit more young people into construction roles, and our list of recommendations highlight exactly how this can be done.”

 

To read the Constructing the Future report in full visit: https://constructingexcellencesw.org.uk/resources/

The sponsor body behind the multibillion revamp of the Houses of Parliament is to be wound up and replaced by a new delivery authority

It was announced earlier this month that the existing Restoration & Renewal Sponsor Body will be stood down and its role taken on by a new body working directly for both the House of Commons Commission and House of Lords Commission.

It is unclear what impact this move will have on proposals, led by BDP, to relocate hundreds of MPs and parliamentary staff from the Palace of Westminster to the neighbouring Northern Estate. However the practice will continue to oversee the ongoing, in-depth series of surveys into the condition of the existing Parliament buildings.

A decision notice posted by the House of Commons Commission said that the new delivery department should be asked to draw up plans for a ‘more rapid prioritisation of critical work on the palace and reduce the need for a complete or nearly-complete decant of the palace’.

In January last year work was paused on BDP’s masterplan to convert a clutch of Grade I and Grade II-listed buildings next to the palace into temporary homes for MPs. That project has a budget of £500 million and included AHMM’s controversial plans to gut Whitfield Partners’ Grade II*-listed Richmond House and install a Commons chamber there.

Any planned works on Richmond House will be led by the House of Commons and are not the responsibility of the Houses of Parliament Restoration and Renewal Sponsor Body or delivery authority.

The Architects Journal understands the cost of the entire Restoration & Renewal programme, together with the decant, had ballooned from the original £4 billion estimate to £14 billion and was set to take up to 17 years to complete.

Heritage group SAVE described the decision to scrap the sponsor body as a ‘splendid outcome’ for its campaign to save Richmon House. The organisation has strongly argued against its near demolition and rebuilding, claiming there were ‘quicker, cheaper and better means of managing the urgent works of repair and renewing’ to the Palace of Westminster.

On Tuesday (8 February), the House of Lords Commission agreed to back moves to scrap the sponsor body, though not ‘until further consideration had taken place’ about ‘what should replace it, based on independent advice and assurance’.

It added: ‘In the meantime, the sponsor body should pare down its activities to focus solely on essential work … [and that] the delivery authority should focus on intrusive surveys and other necessary work’.

Under these proposals, the sponsorship function for the programme would change from being an independent organisation to being a new Parliamentary in-house department. The delivery authority would report to this new sponsor department, and its own overall status would not change. However, the programme will be asked to develop plans around revised objectives and scope for the restoration.

A spokesperson for the Restoration and Renewal Programme Sponsor Body said: ‘BDP continues to be the key architecture and design partner for the Restoration and Renewal Delivery Authority, including supporting the programme of surveys being carried out to create the most detailed understanding of the condition of the Parliament buildings ever created.’

Source: Architects Journal

Speaking at GE Steam Power’s manufacturing site at Belfort in eastern France on Thursday, Macron, who faces a presidential election in April, said the main objective of the new policy was to reduce the country’s energy consumption while increasing its carbon-free energy production capacity.

He said in the coming decades France must produce more carbon-free electricity, because even if it reduces its energy consumption by 40%, the exit from oil and gas within 30 years implies that it will replace part of the consumption of fossil fuels with electricity. The country must therefore be able to produce up to 60% more electricity than today.

“Key to producing this electricity in the most carbon-free, safest and most sovereign way is precisely to have a plural strategy … to develop both renewable and nuclear energies,” Macron stated.

“We have no other choice but to bet on these two pillars at the same time. It is the most relevant choice from an ecological point of view and the most expedient from an economic point of view and finally the least costly from a financial point of view.”

The time is right for a nuclear renaissance in France, Macron said, adding he had made two important decisions regarding this.

Firstly, he said the operation of all existing reactors should be extended without compromising safety.

“If it is necessary to be cautious about the ability to extend our reactors, I hope that no nuclear reactor in a state of production will be closed in the future given the very significant increase in our electrical needs; except, of course, if safety reasons were necessary.”

He added that as the operation of some reactors had already been successfully extended beyond 40 years, he was requesting EDF and the nuclear regulator to “study the conditions for extending beyond 50 years”.

New build programme

Secondly, Macron announced the launch of a programme of new reactors. “We have learned lessons from the construction of EPR in Finland, where it is now complete, and in France at Flamanville. EDF has undertaken with the nuclear sector the design of a new reactor for the French market, the EPR2, which has already mobilised more than one million hours of engineering and presents significant progress compared with the EPR of Flamanville.

“I would like six EPR2s to be built and for us to launch studies on the construction of eight additional EPR2s,” he said. “We will thus advance step by step.”

Preparatory projects will be started in the coming weeks, Macron said, including finalisation of the design studies, referral to the national commission for public debate, definition of the locations of the three pairs of reactors and a ramp-up of the nuclear sector. He said a broad public consultation would take place in the second half of 2022 on energy, then parliamentary discussions will be held in 2023 to revise the multi-annual energy programme.

“We are aiming for construction to begin by 2028, with the first reactor commissioned by 2035. This implementation deadline also justifies the need to extend our current reactors and develop renewable energies.”

In addition, Macron said EUR1.0 billion (USD1.1 billion) will be made available through the France 2030 re-industrialisation plan for France’s Nuward small modular reactor project and “innovative reactors to close the fuel cycle and produce less waste”. He said he had set “an ambitious goal” to construct a first prototype in France by 2030.

“This new programme could lead to the commissioning of 25 gigawatts of new nuclear capacity by 2050,” Macron said.

Preparing the ground

“To implement these decisions, the regulatory, financial and organisational conditions of the sector and of the State must be met,” he added. “Within the State, an inter-ministerial programme department dedicated to new nuclear power will be created to oversee it, coordinate administrative procedures, and ensure compliance with construction costs and deadlines. EDF will build and operate the new EPRs.

“This national sovereignty enterprise, which is our common good, will be able to count on the support of the State for its solidity in the months, years and decades to come and to carry out this project on a scale unmatched for 40 years and to do so under the best financial and operational conditions. From a financial and regulatory perspective, massive public funding of several tens of billions of euros will be committed to finance this new programme, which will make it possible to preserve EDF’s financial situation and develop the entire sector.

“This is all the more important as EDF is going through a difficult period linked in particular to the operational difficulties encountered in the nuclear fleet … the State will assume its responsibilities to secure EDF’s financial situation and its financing capacity in the short and medium-term, as well as to enable it to pursue its profitable development strategy within the framework of the energy transition.”

Macron said the government, in agreement with the European Commission, would implement a new regulation of nuclear electricity that will replace the existing ARENH mechanism. Under ARENH, set up to foster competition, rival energy suppliers can buy electricity produced by EDF’s French nuclear power plants that were commissioned before 8 December 2010.

The new system, he said, would enable “French consumers, households and businesses to benefit from stable prices, close to electricity production costs in France. This is essential so that we can derive all the benefits from the nation’s historic investment and from the investment that we are in the process of recording.”

Nuclear accounts for almost 75% of France’s power production, but former French president Francois Hollande had aimed to limit its share of the national electricity generation mix to 50% by 2025, and to close Fessenheim – the country’s oldest nuclear power plant – by the end of his five-year term, in May 2017.

In June 2014, his government announced nuclear capacity would be capped at the current level of 63.2 GWe and be limited to 50% of France’s total output by 2025. The French Energy Transition for Green Growth Law, adopted in August 2015, did not call for the shutdown of any currently operating power reactors, but it meant EDF would have to close older reactors in order to bring new ones online. However, under a draft energy and climate bill presented in May 2019, France will now delay its planned reduction in the share of nuclear power in its electricity mix to 50% from the current 2025 target to 2035.

Source: World Nuclear News

The Marble Arch Mound, Dubbed London’s worst Tourist Attraction,

the £6m Mound was nicknamed ‘S**t Hill’

The Dutch architects behind the universally panned Marble Arch mound have hit out at Westminster City Council, the UK media, the builders of the mound, English Heritage and Historic England for the project failing to live up to its promise.

Dismantling of the Mound began last week and is scheduled to be completed by May this year.

In a post on their website, architects MVRDV say “anyone who visited the Marble Arch Mound installation was no doubt severely underwhelmed” but place most of the blame on Westminster City Council.

MVRDV claim warnings that opening the Mound prematurely were ignored and say the “nonsensical” decision to do “was nothing short of a disaster.”

The disastrous project, the costs of which ballooned to £6m, saw Westminster’s Deputy Leader Mervyn Caplan forced to resign.

The firm also claims that the original design, which wrapped around Marble Arch, was kiboshed by English Heritage and Historic England, with Westminster eventually deciding to move the hill to the side “away from optimal sightlines.”

MVRDV criticise “what we believe was a lack of vision and transparency.”

The firm also claims it was “systematically excluded from communication with the executive architect and landscape architect” once builders FM Conway were brought on board. The Dutch architects claim Westminster commissioned the builders and “then barely looked at (the project) again.”

Covid-19 travel restrictions also come under fire from the architects.

The Markthal Designed by MVRD and located in the historic Laurenskwartier in the heart of Rotterdam

“Many details concerning the mound’s construction were decided without our involvement. A few pictures of the progress of the installation and the claim that everything was going marvellously was all that we had to work with in Rotterdam.

“Travel was not possible due to Covid measures, so the team could not check progress on site, and frequent communication efforts from our side toward Westminster were increasingly ignored,” the blog post reads.

The architects claim they were told to “remain silent” by Westminster City Council and were “assured… the hill would be restored, re-planted, and improved.”

When the architects arrived, they say “the deception was obvious: there had been virtually no maintenance, making the waste of money complete.”

“In our thirty years of practice, MVRDV has never before experienced such nonchalance and laxity with our design work.”

Source: City AM

 

A new name and exciting new future as Elliott Group and affiliated UK companies become Algeco

 

Elliott Group Ltd, Carter Accommodation Ltd and Procomm Site Services Ltd, leaders in UK modular services and part of Modulaire Group, are today delighted to announce plans to unite under a common brand – Algeco[1].

UK customers will benefit from a stronger, better-integrated and structured organisation, with a renewed commitment to placing customer service excellence at the heart of the organisation.

Algeco shares the responsibility for developing sustainable futures for our customers, our business, and its products and services. Core to this is being a trusted solutions provider to the industries we support. We enable people to work more productively, improve their quality of life, and enhance their learning. We design and deliver whatever our customers need, whenever and wherever they need it.

The move will create a single, consistent brand across the UK and Europe, to reflect the group’s position as a leader in European modular services and infrastructure. Algeco has a proud heritage of serving customers across Europe, providing a strong basis for the single identity, which will facilitate growth in brand equity in the marketplace and allow UK customers to benefit from best practice sharing with Algeco in Europe and producing innovative modular solutions. The adoption of Algeco as the single brand in the UK will create a common sense of identity and purpose for the UK business. We propose to make these changes effective from 31st March 2022.

The combined UK business will be headquartered in Peterborough, with a total of 23 site locations throughout the country servicing its portable, modular building and offsite construction hire and sales activities.

John Campbell, Managing Director of Algeco in the UK, said: “Adopting the Algeco brand in the UK provides a link with our heritage, whilst also symbolising the transformation the UK business is currently going through as part of our group’s global ambitions. We have an exciting future ahead of us.”

He added: “The Algeco brand has solid foundations built on excellence, sustainability, innovation and collaboration. These elements are cornerstones of what we call our customer obsession – continually looking for ways to exceed expectations, deliver best-in-class service and develop sustainable futures for our customers and colleagues.”

Algeco and the Modulaire Group are owned by investment funds managed by Brookfield Business Partners L.P, which acquired the Modulaire Group in December 2021. Brookfield Business Partners is the flagship listed business services and industrials company of Brookfield Asset Management, a leading global alternative asset manager with over $600 billion of assets under management.

 

 

Elliott Group Website

 

[1] Advanté will remain a separate brand with its specialist offering in welfare accommodation.

The Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) says the dramatic surge in energy prices reinforces the need for a national programme of building retrofits.

The Association applauded the government’s attempts to soften the blow to household finances following Ofgem’s decision to lift the energy price cap by 54% from April, but said longer term measures were needed to tackle the issue properly.

“Millions of people are now facing real hardship as a result of the soaring cost of gas and electricity, but we do not have a comprehensive plan for addressing a major contributory factor – the poor energy efficiency of our buildings,” said BESA’s head of technical Graeme Fox.

“The price of energy has never had a higher profile, but most of the talk about possible solutions either refers to short-term financial measures and adjustments to the tax regime or very expensive technical fixes like renewables and hydrogen. Yet, we can fix energy efficiency relatively quickly and cost-effectively through renovation and refurbishment,” added Fox.

Ofgem has announced that the average energy bill for around 18 million households will rise by almost £700 from April. Chancellor Rishi Sunak has promised support via council tax rebates and a discount scheme that will need to be paid back over five years. However, energy market analysts have already predicted further price rises next year and beyond.

Impact

“The government is trying to help by redistributing taxpayers’ money to delay the full impact, but unless we fundamentally tackle the energy performance of both residential and commercial buildings this will simply become a bigger and bigger problem in the years to come,” said Fox.

“We are also in an artificial position because interest rates have been low for so long. The Bank of England has just nudged them up by another 0.25% and they are likely to rise again soon. This, along with higher inflation, will put further pressure on families and businesses who are currently relying on cheap credit to keep their heads above water.”

BESA also welcomed a new report from the Department of Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy’s (BEIS) Select Committee, which has urged the government to invest more heavily in the decarbonisation of heating. Many of the recommendations in the report would also have a positive impact on long-term energy consumption in buildings and help to lower bills, the Association said.

The committee is calling for a replacement for the ill-fated Green Homes Grant, which would be delivered by regional and local government to try and avoid the bureaucratic problems that undermined the last scheme. It said this should be accompanied by a national consumer awareness campaign that would also explain the importance of energy efficiency measures to make low carbon heating technologies, like heat pumps, achieve their full potential.

“Any new low carbon heating incentives would be launching into a much more receptive marketplace now because of the growing alarm over rising energy bills,” said Fox.

Funding could also be aimed at the lowest income homes and those that are most difficult to retrofit to directly support those most likely to suffer most from rising energy costs, the report added. The committee also advised the government to bring forward the Future Homes Standard by two years to 2023, which would help to speed up energy saving improvements.

BESA also urged the government to consult with the industries directly involved in the decarbonisation of heat, such as building services, to fully understand the implications of its policy proposals not least on the need for investment in training and skills.

“We must work together to develop a national low carbon heating training programme to ensure we have the skills to deliver solutions on a scale that can both help tackle climate change and give consumers protection from rising bills,” said Fox.

The Thames Barrier was closed more than 50 times in the 2013/14 winter – comfortably a record.

 

In December 2015, parts of the UK were devastated by record-breaking levels of rainfall as a result of Storm Desmond. More recently, Britain experienced the wettest February on record in 2020 due to the succession of Storm’s Dennis, Ciara and George, which left thousands of homes flooded and many more without power.

Since 1998, the UK has seen six of the ten wettest years on record. But despite investment, plans and actions to address increasing risk are lacking.

Climate change is set to make severe weather events more likely and to raise sea levels. The population of people living in areas that are at significant risk to flooding is projected to rise to 2.6 million by the 2050s under a 2°C scenario or 3.3 million under a 4°C scenario.

 

Record-breaking weather

In the UK, the top 10 warmest years have all occurred since 2002. The longest-running instrumental record of temperature in the world, run by the Met Office’s Central England Temperature data sets, reveals that 2009-2018 was around 1°C warmer than 1850-1900. Several other records have been broken too:

 

  • The winter of 2013/14 was the wettest winter since records began in 1910. Of the top ten wettest winters, four have occurred since 2007 and seven since 1990.
  • December 2015 was not only the wettest December on record, but also the wettest calendar month overall since records began in 1910.
  • February 2020 was the wettest February on record for England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and the second wettest for Scotland.
  • The rainfall from Storm Desmond in 2015 also broke records; Honister, Cumbria, received 341mm (13.4 in) within 24 hours, breaking the November 2009 record of 316.4mm.

 

And, heavy rains are becoming even more common. According to the Met Office, the most recent decade (2009-2018) has been on average 1% wetter than 1981-2010 and 5% wetter than 1961-1990 for the UK overall – and the amount of rain from extremely wet days has increased by 17% when looking at the same periods.

 

Flooding projections

Climate change has made the devastating events, such as Storm Desmond in 2015, 59% more likely, according to research conducted by Oxford University and the Royal Meteorological Institute.

Meanwhile the Met Office forecasts that intense rainfall associated with severe flash flooding could become almost five times more likely by the end of this century.

According to the most recent CCRA report, an estimated 1.8 million people are living in areas of the UK that are at significant risk of coastal, surface or river flooding. The population of people living in such areas is projected to rise to 2.6 million by the 2050s under a 2°C scenario and 3.3 million under a 4°C scenario, assuming a continuation of current levels of adaptation and a low population growth.

Along the English Channel coast, the sea level has already risen by about 12cm in the last 100 years. With the warming we are already committed to over the next few decades, we can expect a further 11-16cm of sea level rise by 2030. This equates to 23-27cm of total sea level rise since 1900.

 

Flooding already poses a risk to vital infrastructure such as roads, fresh water supplies, sewage treatment plants, hospitals, schools and energy supplies, and the risk is projected to rise. By the 2080s, up to 1,800 schools could be exposed to ‘significant likelihood’ of flooding (a greater than 1 in 75 annual chance).

During the decade of the 2020s, 35,000 hectares of high-quality horticultural and arable land are likely to be flooded at least once every three years. By the 2080’s this will reach 130,000 hectares of high quality land – an area larger than Greater Manchester.

 

 

 

Costs

Flood damage currently costs the UK around £1.3 billion each year; the total economic damages for England from the winter 2015 to 2016 floods were estimated to around £1.6 billion, with 32% of total damages occurring to the business sector.

Low income households are amongst the most at risk to flooding and the detrimental financial consequences; they are eight times more likely to live in tidal floodplains than affluent households and 61% of low-income renters do not have home contents insurance, leaving them more susceptible to experiencing a financial shock.

Flooding also has an impact on human health, including mental health. Research found that people who experience extreme weather events such as storms or flooding are 50% more likely to suffer from mental health problems, including depression and anxiety, while a quarter of people who have been flooded still live with these issues at least two years after the event.

The economic loss and damage from flooding in the UK is projected to increase.

There is a 10% chance of a catastrophic flood happening in England within the next two decades causing in excess of £10 billion in damage. Such a flood would cause 10 times more flood damage than the combined impact of the tidal surge and storms in winter 2013/14, and 3 to 4 times more damage than in 2007. Is the UK prepared?

According to the Association of British Insurers (ABI) over 82,000 people claimed for flood or wind damage as a result of storms Dennis and Ciara in February 2020 and the total cost of repairing homes and businesses is expected to top £360 million.

The Committee on Climate Change’s (CCC) 2012 Progress Reports called for a national, long-term, outcomes-based adaptation strategy to address the increasing flood risk to be developed. The 2019 report highlighted that plans and actions to address increasing risk were lacking in development policy, property-level flood resilience and sustainable urban drainage.

The CCC warned in a letter to government in 2020 against shaping future policy on the experiences of the past, given the threat of further extreme weather and sea level rises.

It said: ‘We have a world class track record of delivering high quality flood and coastal defences. However, we cannot afford to continue to build our way out of future climate risks in many places.

Instead, we need to plan for the challenges we will face in the future. We need to support communities to plan better and – in some cases – adapt to future flooding and coastal change. This requires action now so that the UK’s population and economy are ready for what the future may bring.’

National standards ‘will enable all types of places to achieve an appropriate level of resilience that reduces the likelihood and/or consequences of flooding and coastal change for people, infrastructure, the economy and the environment’.

Their introduction and implementation would help make ‘the best land use and development choices… and support international leadership in the run up to the COP26 climate talks’.

In July 2020, the Government and Environment Agency announced a new £5.2 billion flood prevention and coastal management strategy to be brought in over the next 10 years, including protection of 336,000 properties in England by 2027. The plan was generally welcomed positively, but the National Infrastructure Commission warned that more may need to be done, expressing their view that “we are hopeful that today’s plan marks the beginning of the end of reactive cycles of funding, and a fresh focus on levelling up flood resilience for communities across the UK.”

The NAO argues that investing in flood defences is highly cost-effective, concluding that each £1 not invested means communities will suffer up to £8 in unnecessary flood damage.

 

The Thames Barrier & risks to London

In 2014, the Thames Barrier closed 48 times before the middle of March – a record for a single year. More than a quarter of the total closures in the Barrier’s 32-year history occurred in the 2013/14 winter.

Some 1.3 million people live in the Thames tidal floodplain and are therefore vulnerable to flooding if current defences were to fail or were overtaken by climate-induced sea level rise; £275bn worth of property is also at risk.

The Environment Agency’s TE2100 Plan highlights that without effective mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions, the Thames estuary may have to deal with sea level rise that exceeds the Barrier’s capacity.

 

By Richard Black

 

Source: Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit

Rising material prices including steel, timber and concrete combined with labour shortages are hampering housebuilding in the capital, according to the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan.

Government data shows that the cost of construction materials for all types of work increased 23% in the UK in 2021. The Greater London Authority said this rise was roughly equal to the increase seen during the previous 12 years in total.

The mayor, repeating a previous call for the government to provide additional grant funding for affordable housing in London, pointed to schemes including from his own housing programmes that were being “severely impacted” by escalating material prices.

These include a scheme in southeast London which has seen costs increasing 45% based on tender prices and a south London borough reporting cost inflation “spiking” up to 17%.

Earlier this month, the mayor called for the government to introduce a Coronavirus Recovery Visa to deal with labour shortages, including in construction. He said the visa should allow workers at least 12 months to work in the UK. And it should accommodate those working on a self-employed basis, which is often the case with construction.

His call came as he cited UK statistics revealing a construction vacancy rate at its highest recorded level since 2001. And in summer 2021, construction vacancies were 40% higher than in the three months before the pandemic.

The Greater London Authority referenced data from the Office for National Statistics, showing that in December, almost a quarter of construction firms in the UK reported a shortage of workers, against the all-industry average of 14.6%. It said these shortages were partly in response to Brexit-related added costs. And 13.7% of construction firms said transport was costing them more.

The mayor said: “Since becoming mayor, I have made tackling London’s housing crisis one of my top priorities. From City Hall, we have worked tirelessly to get London building again, but the twin effects of the pandemic and Brexit has hit both housebuilders and consumers hard.

“Put simply, materials and labour are needed to build homes. Without bricks and mortar, and enough skilled workers, the excellent progress we have made in delivering the good quality and genuinely affordable homes that Londoners need is at risk of stalling.”

 

Source: Property Reporter