Cost of living causing consumers to think again about retrofitting

 

RICS and YouGov survey shows homes therefore less likely to be able to cope with climate impacts or to mitigate rising energy costs

The cost of living crisis, has cast new doubt on the progress towards the United Kingdom’s Net-Zero ambition. Previous research from RICS* had found that homeowners were citing cost of retrofitting as a barrier, but despite new policy measures, new research from RICS and YouGov shows that consumers are now concerned about paying for the cost of living above upgrading their homes.

Retrofitting has obvious benefits, such as being able to maintain a constant temperature in the home, as well as increasing the desirability of your property – the December 2019 Residential Market Survey*, prior to the energy crisis, cited almost two thirds of the survey’s respondents believed that the willingness to pay for energy efficient homes would rise in the next three years.

However, the latest consumer research from RICS and YouGov shows that homeowners are unsurprisingly looking to concentrate spending on escalating household costs.

The new research backs up previous calls made by the institution in 2020 for more policy measures to incentivise industry and consumers to retrofit the UK housing stock. The research found that while 34% of homeowners said they would invest in green technology to lower bills in the future, 45% would be focusing on using any savings to pay for their existing living expenses, meaning more incentives and cheaper options must be made available if the country is to stay on track to meet target and green 15million properties*.

This latest research follows the RICS January 2020 Residential Market Survey* where members operating in the residential sales and lettings market stated that without strong market driven incentives, regulation was the policy lever with the greatest potential to improve energy efficiency outcomes. Alternatively, a tax policy could achieve a similar effect through a mix of stamp duty and a reduction of VAT on home improvements.

Currently, the Government’s ambition to hit Net-Zero carbon emissions requires significant numbers of private homeowners to retrofit their properties to make them greener.

51% who confirmed they hadn’t already installed new energy saving measures in their homes but would know how to, said it was because of the costs involved. And of the same group, even those who would consider it to make their home more attractive to prospective buyers, 40% said they’d only consider spending around £1000 to £5000 on energy improvements, which could pay for some solar panels** but wouldn’t cover the heat-pump.

As the cost of living continues to consume more household finances, measures are needed to avoid many properties failing to meet targets and becoming un-mortgageable. To review the potential impact that failure to support consumers would have on the housing market, most homeowners (55%) would consider installing energy saving schemes if they knew it would make their property more attractive when it came to selling up. With figures from Rightmove showing that greener homes can attract a higher premium, properties need more than an EPC assessment to help inform decisions**.

As EPCs aren’t the best measure for all properties, as some listed buildings can’t have triple glazing for example, RICS is recommending and working with lenders and government to look into ‘Retrofit Surveys’ which would enlist the expertise of a professional – such as a building surveyor- to provide detailed advice on what technologies homeowners could install to help inform their decisions. This is supported with 77% of homeowners saying they’d find this advice helpful when thinking of buying a new home.

Sam Rees, Senior Public Affairs Officer at RICS, said:

“The retrofitting of millions of UK homes will be essential to helping to meet our net zero ambitions, however homeowners’ immediate concerns are understandably with the rising cost of living, especially their energy bills. It is important to recognise that retrofitting and the cost of living are not mutually exclusive issues.

“A suitably retrofitted, low-carbon home can help with the long-term challenges of the cost of living and reducing high levels of energy consumption. Achieving this however is not cheap. With the UK Government giving financial support to homeowners to support them with rising energy prices, RICS is calling on the government to extend this support and provide additional financial incentives to homeowners to encourage retrofitting and ultimately helping to tackle the cause of high energy usage.

“Before any significant investment is made on retrofit measures, RICS urges homeowners and the government to ensure a retrofit assessment is undertaken on the property first – ensuring that no unintended consequences occur such as overheating or increased energy demand. This is critical to protecting consumers and RICS is undertaking significant research to support such assessments.”

FURTHER INFORMATION

*RICS UK Residential Market Surveys UK Residential Market Survey (rics.org)

**Rightmove-Green-Homes-Report.pdf

The top energy saving measures homeowners who know how to make their home more environmentally friendly said they already had installed in their property were:

Double or triple glazed windows – 71%
Energy-efficient lighting – 69%
Loft/cavity wall insultation – 63%
Energy efficient appliances – 52%
Solar panels – 17%
Air source heat pumps 5%
Geothermal heating – 2%

All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 4357 adults of which 2776 are homeowners. Fieldwork was undertaken between 31st May – 3rd June 2022. The survey was carried out online. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all GB adults (aged 18+).

* 15 million homes need energy efficiency upgrades – Lloyds Banking Group plc

** Solar panels typically cost between £2,900 and £6,700 according to the Energy Saving’s Trust.

By Vicky Spratt

 

After a spate of police raids due to drugs and anti-social behaviour, it seemed one suburb of Grimsby was doomed. A community group turned socially conscious ethical landlord has rejuvenated the area and made it into a community once again.

 

East Marsh is a suburb of Grimsby in north east Lincolnshire which has often made headlines for the wrong reasons. In 2017, there were police raids due to drugs and anti-social behaviour. Then, in 2019, flashing blue lights of police vans lit up Oxford Street, Rutland Street and Stanley Street as officers tried to contain unrest which resulted in confrontations between locals and police.

It was these problems which prompted local man, 62-year-old Billy Dasein – who grew up in East Marsh and still lives there today – to take action.

“A community meeting was held,” he explains “and I wasn’t going to go but then my neighbour said, ‘our mums would have gone’ so I did, and that’s when I found myself speaking up.” It cemented his decision to continue the work of the community group he co-founded in 2017 – East Marsh United.

The name was deliberately chosen because it sounds like a local football team and is a world away from the “levelling up” jargon often used in political discourse. It began as a weekly meeting of local people who took on social problems such as litter and fly tipping.

Five years on, they have become a socially conscious ethical landlord. The group has begun to raise investment to buy up dilapidated homes in the area, renovate them and rent them out to people at an affordable rate which is tied to the Local Housing Allowance (the mechanism through which housing benefit is calculated). So far, they have three properties and are hoping to expand imminently.

Poor housing is rife in East Marsh and in this part of England overall; there are more than 50,000 households living in energy inefficient homes in north east Lincolnshire which means not only that poor insulation is causing mould and damp but that energy bills are high.

Walking around Rutland Street with Pete Rowley – who runs the ethical building firm, East Marsh Construction, which works closely with East Marsh United aims to employ local people on fair wages to work on homes which need doing up – it is easy to spot the homes which have been renovated.

 

Peter Rowley, East Marsh Construction

 

“We put a new roof on that one,” Mr Rowley points to a terraced house. “When we were brought in, it was owned by a private landlord and there were six children living there. There was damp everywhere, running down the walls.”

“We’ve been deliberately focusing on the very worst homes, some of which have been boarded up for eight or nine years,” Mr Rowley adds as we walk around. “A big problem here is that landlords from out of town have bought up ‘cheap’ properties as investments which, sometimes, they’ve never seen and they don’t care about the condition of them as long as they get their rent.”

 

 

The local Reverend Kay Jones, who is also involved with East Marsh United, confirms the scale of the problem. She said: “I’ve been to one house where the floorboards were rotten and you had to jump over a hole to get in. These people have no choice, they take that house or they’re homeless.”

“East Marsh United,” Revd Jones adds, “is a response to a community that has never had a voice for itself.”

 

It wasn’t always like this. Grimsby itself, including the area of East Marsh, was once a thriving community. Mr Rowley is something of a historian in his spare time and explains that the terraced homes here are built on top of marshland which was drained to build homes for rail workers in the 1800s. After that, they were home to the families of deep sea trawler workers when Grimsby was one of the biggest fishing docks in the world.

“There was work,” Mr Dasein says of his community’s past. “It wasn’t well-paid and I suppose you’d call it ‘zero hours’ today but you could walk out of one job and into another easily. There were opportunities here.”

Today, though, according to the local council’s Director of Public Health’s annual report, East Marsh is in the top 1 per cent of most deprived wards in England. And, earlier this year, there were three people chasing every job vacancy.

The contemporary challenges faced by the people of Grimsby – caused by the decline of the town’s fishing industry following the 70s Cod Wars and a lack of investment for essential infrastructure such as roads – are often highlighted by politicians. In the last year former Levelling Up Secretary Michael Gove, outgoing Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer and his shadow Levelling Up secretary Lisa Nandy have all paid flying visits – but the need for decent housing is rarely mentioned.

The group’s focus on homes, then, is no accident. Mr Dasein, Mr Rowley, Revd Jones and their colleague local architect 59-year-old Mark Hodson, are all sceptical about the government’s “Levelling Up” agenda.

 

Mark Hodson, Local Architect

 

“There’s a lot of jargon that gets used after people come to East Marsh,” Mr Hodson, who was born on the East Marsh Estate and grew up locally, says, “but safe housing and finding somewhere decent to live needs to be a key aspect of any “levelling up” agenda.”

“It was almost inevitable that something like the riots in 2017 happened,” Mr Hodson says when we meet at the Shalom Community Centre with Mr Rowley. “We needed an organisation like East Marsh United to take back some form of control. We needed to directly respond to absent landlords who don’t care about their properties or the tenants in them.”

 

 

Mr Dasein agrees. “I joke that people talk about the community at East Marsh as though we’re from another planet – East Martians,” he jokes. “But people here need the same basic things as people everywhere.”

“I talk about the ‘broken window theory’ a lot,” adds Mr Dasein. The premise of this idea, which came to prominence in sociology in the 1980s, is simple: if left unattended, seemingly small issues like broken windows, litter or boarded up homes contribute to an overall sense of disorder and disenfranchisement in a community.

“If you don’t look after the smaller infractions on a street then it’s going to escalate to bigger things because it says, ‘nobody cares, there is nobody looking after our place’,” Mr Dasein explains. “It’s all about that little word that means so much – home.”

“We are not buying houses as an investment tool which is how they’ve been treated here and in other places unfortunately,” Mr Dasein continues. “We’re buying them to be homes for our people.”

Before I leave East Marsh, I bump into a young man – Terry – and his partner who are currently renting their home from East Marsh United.

He smiles enthusiastically when I ask him what living in one of their properties is like:

“They’re absolutely brilliant. If something needs to be done, they do it. They’re not one of these landlords who are afraid to spend money. They respect their tenants. They’re not jumping down your throat if you’re going to be a few days late on the rent. They work with you.”

 

As politicians in Westminster grapple with regional inequality, talk of “levelling up” is the latest in a long line of buzzwords from former Conservative chancellor George Osborne’s “Northern Powerhouse” to media commentators’ use of the “Left Behind” to describe people from places such as Grimsby who voted to leave the European Union. But East Marsh United wants to keep things simple.

East Marsh United’s vision is “a hundred houses for a hundred years”. This would create a sustainable revenue stream via rental income to keep the organisation going. As things stand, they have raised half of the £500,000 they need in a community share offer to fund another 10 homes. For every £100,000 invested, the chairman of Grimsby Town FC Jason Stockwood has pledged to invest £10,000.

They could well be onto something. Recent analysis by Pro Bono Economics has shown that the presence of community assets – that is, things which are for and owned by local people – might be a better predictor of life satisfaction in an area than its GDP or average household income.

There is a photograph that Mr Dasein likes to show when he is giving presentations about East Marsh United’s work: it shows him on the doorstep of his family home as a baby.

“There’s no litter in the photo and you can see that people have put plant pots outside their homes on the pavement, but this is something that you just could not do today because they’d be trashed,” Mr Dasein says. “People just want a nice house, nice neighbours and enough money to get by. That’s the point.”

Source: I news

GEZE UK has strengthened its Window Technology team with the recent appointment of Dean Tonna, who joins the renowned manufacturer of door and window control systems as Area Sales Manager covering the Midlands, south of England, south and mid-Wales.

Supporting GEZE UK’s planned growth for window technology products, Dean will focus on developing first-class relationships with key contacts at fabricators, contractors and distributors, and work with architects and M&E consultants to develop specifications and provide technical solutions from the company’s extensive window control range for both natural ventilation and natural smoke and heat extraction.

With a strong track record in technical sales, including experience working for Monodraught, Coxdome and Glidevale, Dean has extensive experience in the sector and will be assisting M&E consultants in specifying the correct products to form part of an integrated fire and indoor climate control system.

Dean will also be focusing on the education sector as the sector looks to reduce CO2 emissions in line with Net Zero targets for 2030.

Said Dean ‘I am pleased to join GEZE, they are a well-respected name in the industry and are a market leader with a varied product range. I am familiar with the route to market so will be able assist customers with advice and specifications immediately.

Andy Iredale, National Sales Manager for Automatic Doors and Window Technology added ‘It’s great to have Dean on the team; he brings with him a wealth of knowledge and experience. He will be an important part of the company’s continued growth.’

For more information about GEZE UK’s comprehensive range of automatic and manual door and window control products visit www.geze.co.uk

Modern Methods of Construction (MMC) is increasingly recognised as a key solution to solving the UK’s housing crisis. Clive Feeney, LHC’s Interim Group Director, explains why.

In recent years MMC has carved a place in government policy, with Homes England placing it at the forefront of future housing development.
Dwellings built using these methods have great powers to expedite the levelling up agenda, thanks to speedy construction, use of low carbon building materials and methods, and the energy efficient, cheaper-to-heat homes produced.
The Homes England Affordable Homes programme mandates that 25% of new homes will be constructed using MMC, while the MMC taskforce, set up in early 2021, was allocated £10m funding to accelerate the adoption of offsite methods. This recognition of the value of MMC in homebuilding projects, coupled with investment to accelerate the adoption of offsite methods, is extremely welcome.

Fulfilling demand

Quality housing should be attainable for all UK citizens. But with more than one million people on social housing waiting lists, it is more important than ever to speed up the delivery of new homes to meet this demand.
A major benefit of using MMC is that not only is it possible to create better quality homes for people, but to build them more quickly than would be possible using traditional construction methods.
As is well-known, MMC-built homes are assembled in factory environments, allowing for more rigorous quality control. They are more energy efficient than traditional brick builds, with better insulation and designs created with sustainability and efficiency integral to them. Not only is this good for the environment and vital to helping us all reduce carbon emissions, but it is also significant in managing household utility spending – a crucial element in levelling up and in lessening the blow of rocketing energy bills.
One of the barriers to MMC being used in greater numbers has so far been the inability to scale up developments. But there may now be the catalyst, thanks to increasing routes to procure MMC through construction frameworks, together with July’s announcement from 2021-formed trade body, Make Modular, that it could reach 15,000 homes a year by 2024. This is in part due to a £500m investment in factory facilities since 2016 from its members, which include Ilke Homes, TopHat, Laing O’Rourke and Legal & General Modular Homes.

Reluctance to adopt

One of the key stumbling blocks is a hesitancy on the part of the social housing sector to adopt MMC until it becomes a tried and tested approach. Many registered providers would rather let the big commercial players make the mistakes from which smaller providers can learn, but can’t afford to make. This is an understandable but unfortunate impediment to progress which will no doubt be overcome in time as evidence of its benefits becomes clearer and it is recognised as a safe, progressive and cost-effective approach to housebuilding.
There is also an educational component to encouraging the adoption of MMC as standard. Requiring a significant shift in the way our homes are designed, procured and delivered, MMC is arguably the single biggest change to housing construction in many decades. The case is clear, but there’s much work to do to improve confidence in the sector and begin to see a wholehearted acceptance of MMC as the norm.

A brighter future

LHC has already supported the creation of more than 5,300 MMC-built social homes and with extra support provided by government, it is likely we will see more widespread uptake for the delivery of affordable homes built using MMC in the short term.
What will certainly help to drive the use of MMC is an aggregation of projects from housing providers across the country to allow greater standardisation in the supply chain. This means delivery can be quicker and cheaper, while facilitating the production of buildings of a higher quality.
At LHC we have already started on this journey and are connecting social housing providers across the UK and encouraging a constructive culture of collaboration. We are focused on identifying areas in which providers can aggregate and seek to approach their projects using MMC together, while sharing the burden of risk.
This approach has the potential to help scale the MMC market more quickly, enabling us to help UK residents reap the many benefits that a comfortable, safe home brings. It is also a vital ingredient in supporting the government’s levelling up agenda and addressing the inequality that has long surrounded our housing sector.

 

 

 

Article by Clive Feeney,

Interim Group Director at LHC Group

 

 

 

www.lhc.gov.uk


THE SUMMER ISSUE OF MMC MAGAZINE IS NOW AVAILABLE TO READ ONLINE

The expected surge in the energy price cap to a rumoured £4,266 in January 2023 is not only causing distress for households but has also blown a hole in the Government’s domestic heating strategy.

That’s the warning from industry body, the Energy and Utilities Alliance (EUA), who have slammed the Government’s Heat and Building Strategy unveiled last October, which includes a key commitment of mass heat pump rollouts in British homes instead of gas boilers.

Claiming the strategy is “now dead in the water”, EUA Chief Executive Mike Foster says the government is out of touch with the public.

 

Mike says: “Research dictates a quarter of UK households across the UK have no savings, with some areas like the West Midlands at 42%. To continue to have a policy that asks people in the middle of an energy crisis to fit a heat pump costing as much as £10,000 is frankly perverse. The government needs to urgently come up with a credible domestic heating strategy that gives us a roadmap to heat our homes and deliver Net Zero.”

 

The government is currently subsidising a first wave of 90,000 heat pumps – the Boiler Upgrade Scheme – with a taxpayer subsidy of £5,000 that is costing £450 million.

 

Mr Foster says the subsidy still leaves households trying to find the shortfall. “Consumers can’t afford heat pumps; they can’t afford to retrofit their homes with energy efficiency measures; they can’t afford new radiators or to pay for a hot water cylinder to be installed. Put bluntly, most can’t afford to pay the bills soon coming their way with Price Cap increases. They have no savings and yet the government’s strategy is still to ask them to fit a heat pump they won’t be able to afford.”

He continued: “We also need to consider whether subsidising heat pump installations is the best use of taxpayer’s cash. The subsidy would be more effective if targeted towards energy efficiency measures in the home, reducing bills for Brits reportedly already in debt on average £206 to profiting energy companies.

 

Data from the Energy Savings Trust indicates £450 million would provide 849,000 lofts with insulation, saving households £216.5 million a year on bills, while reducing carbon emissions by 509,400 tonnes. If used to fit cavity wall insulation[2], 375,000 homes would benefit, saving £106.9 million a year on bills and reducing carbon emissions by 251,250 tonnes.

 

He concluded: “We are in the middle of a cost of living crisis; bills are soaring and consumers hurting. Is now the time for taxpayers to pay a middle-class bung to fit a heat pump, when there are better ways of reducing bills for more people and cutting greater levels of carbon?

“We know Whitehall officials are worried it is failing. The total scheme, over three years, amounts to £450 million subsidising 90,000 heat pumps. That same amount means nearly one million homes could get free insulation, cutting bills by nearly £220 million a year. Surely that’s the greater prize in these difficult times?”

 

 

Construction Industry Training Board (CITB)

chief executive Tim Balcon talking to builders – Credit: Peter Devlin

Norfolk is hosting a pilot which could revolutionise the way the construction sector is able to train recruits.

The county is one of five areas chosen across the UK to be part of the Construction Industry Training Board (CITB) scheme.

More than 3,800 levy-registered building business are eligible to take part in the new employer network project. It is open to businesses of all sizes and the aim is to simplify the process , says the CITB – the sector’s skills body.

Employers receive guidance on how to find and fund the training most appropriate to them. It’s “a huge opportunity” for them to set out their training requirements – and decide how funds are used in their local area, it adds.

They don’t have to access the grant scheme as the employer network will help organise and fund training directly. Requirements around training will also be relaxed “to ensure the pilots can be as reflective of the employer’s needs as possible”, it says. Any training that helps the business work better whether it’s a construction skill or a business skill will qualify.

CITB chief executive Tim Balcon said: “I’m really excited about this pilot – this is about putting employers in the driving seat to identify and address their local skills challenges and how best CITB can align our funding and resources to support their skills needs. I would encourage employers in the pilot areas to get involved and use their voice to shape and engage with the local training provision.

The other four pilot areas are Inverness, Lincoln, South West Wales and the Midlands.

Norfolk Construction Training Group will provide the training in the county. Chairman John Farley said: “As an extremely active training group, we are delighted to be a part of the pilot for the new Employer Network Pilot, aimed at encouraging the wider construction community to engage in training.

“We identify that training is essential for the industry to grow and thrive – this programme is an exciting opportunity to make that happen.

“We feel once implemented it will have a serious impact with employers and improve much needed skill levels within the local area.”

Source: Eastern Daily Express

The materials shortage has plagued the UK trade industry for two years, and now new research has revealed the stark impact this has had on workers in the sector.

 

The study, conducted by IronmongeryDirect, the UK’s largest supplier of specialist ironmongery, found that more than three-quarters (78%) of tradespeople have struggled to source the materials they’ve needed in the last year.

 

As a result, almost half (46%) have had to delay or turn down work, and nearly a fifth (19%) have been forced to let customers down after committing to jobs.

 

When asked which specific materials they’ve found difficult to find, the most common replies were paint (21%), timber (19%) and steel (17%).

 

The 10 materials that UK tradespeople have found hardest to source in the last year are:

 

#Material%
1Paint21%
2Timber19%
3Steel17%
4Blocks14%
5Bricks13%
6Coatings13%
7Semi-conductors13%
8Plasterboard12%
9Cement12%
10Microchips12%

 

Unfortunately, more than one in five (22%) respondents said that they can’t see the shortage easing anytime soon, and that they believe problems will continue into 2023.

 

Inflation is the main factor they blame (20%), with record levels driving up prices across the board and affecting the supply chain.

 

The impact of Coronavirus (17%), rising energy costs (15%) and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine (15%) are also perceived to be responsible.

 

While the shortage has been felt across the industry, some trades have struggled to source materials more than others. The study found that plasterers (92%), surveyors (88%) and joiners (87%) have been hit the hardest.

 

Roofers, however, are the most likely workers to have had to turn down work (60%) as a result of the issue.

 

Dominick Sandford, Managing Director at IronmongeryDirect, said: “The materials shortage continues to be one of the industry’s main challenges, with workers across all trades finding it hard to source what they need to meet the demand for their services.

 

“The impact is felt in many ways – financially, as many have had to refuse work as a result, but also personally, as our recent Mental Health in the Trades report found that the shortage is one of the main causes of stress for tradespeople in 2022.

 

“In recent weeks, there have been signs of the situation easing slightly, so hopefully things will continue to improve as the year goes on.”


THE SUMMER ISSUE OF MMC MAGAZINE IS NOW AVAILABLE TO READ ONLINE

If you would like to receive free printed copies of MMC CLICK HERE to subscribe

Whilst the UK bakes in Mediterranean conditions New Zealand is in its mid-winter season with temperatures averaging 10c, this report indicates that the outlook for construction is also wintery in nature.

 

New home build inquiries have declined steeply since last year, and residential construction intentions have plummeted – but the industry expects it will avoid a global financial crisis-style crash this time around.

ANZ’s latest business outlook shows residential construction intentions have plummeted to a fresh low, down to a net -73.7% in July from -57.9% in June.

A reading of zero would mean the sector was evenly split on whether the outlook was positive or negative.

The bank’s chief economist, Sharon Zollner, said it was a “truly spectacular crash” in sentiment, and the outlook for house building had hit a brick wall.

New home consents are now dropping, and ANZ’s business outlook data suggests they may have a lot further to fall yet.

Consents are currently at historic highs, with 50,736 issued in the year ended June. But, on a monthly basis, the number of dwelling consents fell 2.3% in June, and it was the third monthly decline in a row.

With ongoing rises in costs, delays due to supply chain issues, and a string of building company liquidations, no-one expects the construction boom to continue, but there is much speculation around how bad the fall-out could be.

Recently, there have been reports of a significant drop-off in new build inquiries. Some estimates suggest an 80% to 90% decrease, but Master Builders chief executive David Kelly says hard data on this is difficult to come by, and no-one really knows how much inquiries have fallen by.

Group home builders, such as Signature Homes, Stonewood Homes and Jennian Homes, say demand is lower than it was previously, and inquiries and sales have slowed.

Building Industry Federation chief executive Julien Leys says the decline in new build inquiries is marked. Some group home builders, which do 50 to 100 home developments, have seen orders drop off the cliff, he says.

“One builder had 48 homes that people had signed up for, and those buyers have all now walked away from them. That is a huge change in order numbers, and it hits hard. The level of demand has fallen, and an industry slowdown is on the way.”

The record level of consents issued over the last year is unlikely to be matched by an equivalent number of new homes, as New Zealand has never built more than 40,000 in one year, he says.

“But the high consent levels do mean many builders have order books which are pretty full for the next 12 to 18 months. The question is what will happen when that pipeline of work has been worked through? What will be happening early next year?”

One handbrake for the industry is escalating costs. Leys doubts this will change any time soon, primarily because of freight costs. Trans-Tasman shipping costs were up by 40% in July, compared to the same time last year.

Another handbrake is the lack of skilled labour, with a new EBOSS survey showing 91% of builders think there are not enough staff to hire. This contributes to project delays, and cost increases.

These factors mean a downturn is on the way, and there will be more company insolvencies, Leys says. “But the sort of crash that occurred in the GFC is unlikely as the fundamentals behind that scenario are not there now.”

Home-buyers are wary about new builds due to the cost issues, but another reason for the slowdown is the tough lending environment created by the CCCFA rules and banks’ tighter criteria, Kelly says.

“It looks as though banks are starting to rethink that for some, and that will help. There are other counter-balancing factors at play too. One is the existing pipeline of work, which will take time to work though.”

Another is the Government’s commitment to supporting home building through the Affordable Housing Fund and Kāinga Ora, he says.

“The timing of the fund is important as it will help to derisk the situation for some development. There is also a big pipeline of work with Kāinga Ora. This won’t solve all the problems, but it will help, and it is something that was not there last time.”

There will be pain ahead for some as that is always the case in this type of environment, Kelly says.

“But the industry has been on a continuous upward trend for about 10 years, a particularly long growth cycle. It always had to come to an end, and now we are going to see a correction, rather than a crash.”

Demand for builders and new builds has far exceeded supply in recent years, and the coming downturn is likely to change that, Certified Builders chief executive Malcolm Fleming says.

There will be some shaking out within the industry, but it will be more of a realignment after an extraordinary boom time than a crash, he says.

“New Zealand still has a housing deficit, and the Government has been working to get away from the boom-bust cycle we’ve had in the past. So there is Kāinga Ora work that needs to be done, as well as some iwi social housing projects.”

There is also the retirement home building space, which continues to grow, and demand for work in the renovation and refurbishment remains strong, he says.

“For consumers who want to build, there will now be more opportunities for them to get the builder they want and to work with their builder closely.

“But cost concerns mean there is likely to be a realignment of expectations around the size of the house they need as the bigger it is, the higher the cost.”

There is still buyer demand out there, but many buyers are sitting on the sidelines because they can not get finance, or because they want to see what happens with the market, Waikato developer John Kenel says.

“The market has slowed, more than it should have because of the tighter LVRs and the CCCFA rules. Now, the only people buying and selling are those who have to, so there has been a big decline in new build inquiries.”

But while there are fewer inquiries, which affects orders, the inquiries he is getting are more serious, he says. “There was a lot of speculation, people buying off-the-plan and hoping to flip, and that has gone.”

Kenel, who is chief executive of Assured Property, thinks the market will stagger along until something changes to offer more certainty to buyers. That might be a reduction in the LVRs, or a stabilisation of interest rates.

“Builders and developers are affected by the downturn in the cycle, but that is what it is – part of the cycle. I’m not panicking, and I don’t think the bottom will drop out of the market. People need homes, and property remains a stable and secure asset.”

Economist Tony Alexander says consent numbers will fall away rapidly, and a fair amount of those already issued will not be built.

“Lots of people are over-exposed as the high level of demand for new builds has dropped off, and many of the inexperienced and over-optimistic would-be developers who entered the market will see failure.”

But there will not be a repeat of the industry crashes of the 1970s, when consents dropped from 40,000 in 1975 to 15,000 in the early 1980s, or the GFC, when consents dropped from 26,000 in 2007 to 13,500 in 2011, he says.

“Back in the GFC, mortgage rates were at 10.5%, while unemployment jumped from 3.6% in late 2007 to 6.1% by late 2010, and stayed close to 6% through to 2013.

“This time round, unemployment is not likely to go much further than 4%, some fixed mortgage rates are already coming back a bit, and credit is starting to flow a bit more freely than it was earlier this year.”

He believes buyers are still round, but waiting in the shadows to see what happens with interest rates and house prices.

“When there is more certainty, they will re-enter the market, but over the next year or so we’ll see a collective focus on falling consent numbers. This will be a mild reality check for the home building sector, but it won’t be a horror show.”

Source: Stuff


THE SUMMER ISSUE OF MMC MAGAZINE IS NOW AVAILABLE TO READ ONLINE

If you would like to receive free printed copies of MMC CLICK HERE to subscribe

UKGBC study reveals essential role of circularity in delivering net zero buildings

The UK Green Building Council (UKGBC) has published new insight into the positive impact circular thinking can have in delivering whole life carbon reductions and value creation across construction projects.
  • Through the smart application of circular economy practices, significant carbon reductions can be made across built environment projects. 
  • Projects across the UK are successfully re-using building materials such as steel and other building structures to save embodied carbon, whilst also reducing project costs.
  • Greater consistency is urgently needed in the measurement and reporting of whole life carbon and circularity practices, to support the industry’s transition to net zero. 
  • The benefits of circularity can extend beyond carbon, with a range of organisational, social, environmental, and financial value uplifts. 

The global shortage and fluctuating costs of raw materials are increasingly driving the construction industry to explore opportunities to adopt circular thinking, including the re-use of materials and re-purposing of existing building structures. Published in 2021, the Net Zero Whole Life Carbon Roadmap (The Roadmap) confirmed that a net zero carbon built environment is achievable by 2050 and highlighted the essential role the greater use of circular economy principles will play in reducing carbon.  

Published today (August 11th 2022, UKGBC’s latest study, How Circular Economy Principles can impact carbon and value’, seeks to increase understanding within the built environment industry of how circularity can support reductions in whole life carbon. It also seeks to enable project decision-makers and key built environment stakeholders to strengthen the business case for implementing circularity. It  demonstrates that circularity benefits not just carbon, but delivers against a much broader set of organisational, social, environmental, and financial aims. The research also offers a library of case studies which evidence the positive impact circularity is already delivering across new and existing projects within the UK.  

A key conclusion of the report finds that many new and existing building projects have already used circular economy principles and are able to set out the resulting carbon reductions. Most notable is the level of carbon savings occurring through the reuse of existing assets and materials. For example, the case studies illustrate how significant upfront embodied carbon savings are being delivered through the reuse of existing structures, facades and steel. 

The research also identified an important gap in industry knowledge when it comes to measuring and reporting the impact created through applying circularity. The research concludes that measurement is infrequent, inconsistent, and difficult due to the lack of a common set of metrics and methods to measure both the whole life carbon and circularity of projects. Positively, the research also finds that many individuals and groups are working to improve clarity and consistency on these issues. 

UKGBC’s Chief Executive Officer, Julie Hirigoyen, said:

“The circular economy represents an enormous opportunity for the built environment industry. Today’s research demonstrates that through the smart application of circular practices, significant carbon savings can be made across the entire lifecycle of a building, as well as delivering cost-benefits and providing opportunities to enhance social value.

Whilst UKGBC’s Roadmap confirmed a net zero carbon built environment is achievable by 2050, it also reinforced that meeting this target will require a transformational shift in the way we approach and deliver construction projects, with circularity as a fundamental part of the solution.”

The findings of this research are primarily intended to be used by project decision-makers and key built environment stakeholders seeking to strengthen the business case for implementing circularity across their projects. This includes developers, owners, and investors in real estate, as well as design, construction, and consultancy teams advising real estate clients on their new and existing developments. Although the focus of the report is on non-domestic and domestic buildings, findings will also likely be relevant to infrastructure projects. 

Not really a construction story this one, but I thought it was charmingly put together and having just witnessed an unsuspecting tourist lose his Fish and Chip Lunch to one of the marauders, I thought it was something that folk in general should pay heed to, happy weekend everyone, Lyn

 


Winged hooligans bring misery to the heroes who empty our bins

A new front has opened in the war between mankind and vicious flying fury – the seagulls are after our refuse collectors, and they’re bigger and angrier than before.

Refuse collectors all over the country say that the avian criminals are bolder than ever in their attempts to get their beaks into tasty rubbish, to the point that they’ll physically attack any poor human that stands in their way.

And one national waste and recycling company,  Divert.co.uk – says the problem is only getting worse, and has the pictures to prove it.

“It’s like a scene out of an Alfred Hitchcock movie,” says Divert.co.uk spokesperson Mark Hall, “The one with all the birds”.

While seagulls and rubbish dumps go together in a love-hate relationship like Han and Leia in Star Wars, Hall explains, “these new super-angry seagulls are becoming a total birdemic, with our teams being forced to run for their lives”.

Birdemic: What’s going on?

When Eric Cantona famously made his bizarre ‘seagulls follow the trawler’ speech, he was wrong in every way. Seagulls, as we all know, follow the bin lorry, and the feathered fiends seem to be getting more vicious every day.

Barely a day goes by without the beady eyes of the airborne hooligans settling upon one of our team emptying a bin or unloading the truck, without them swooping in for the kill, squawking like a demented car alarm.

Whether they’re protecting their young, looking for tasty treats among the refuse, or that they simply hate humans, it looks like increasing numbers of urban gulls are fighting for every scrap of food they can find, and they won’t let waste collectors stand in their way.

And one thing is certain among veterans of the waste industry- these monsters are more numerous and far larger than the scrawny specimens of the past.

“It’s like they came from an Evil Scientist’s lab”, says Divert’s Mark Hall, “but we know that the birds are eating better, getting more confident, and know they’re getting the better of us.”

“God help us all if these monsters start organising themselves.”

“It was like a nightmare become real,” says refuse operator Dariusz of one of his several bird-based ordeals, “they came out of nowhere and just went for me, all beaks and claws.

“I had to run for the truck cab to save myself,” he said, “there were already two other guys in there doing the same.”

It’s even worse by the coast where, emboldened by the easy pickings left by careless tourists, the winged ASBO candidates have declared war on people tasked with taking their food supply away – the vulnerable, and some would say innocent, refuse operative.

“Empty a seafront bin?” says refuse collector Mark Taylor of Addingham, “not without full protective gear. I’m ex-Forces and nothing terrifies me more than those flying gits.”

What can be done?

The rise of the urban gull and their evil human-hating ways comes directly from human activity.

High-rise buildings mean that they can lay their eggs and raise their brood out of the reach of natural predators like foxes. More seagulls surviving means less food to go around, and that has turned them into vicious pecking machines with a liking for extreme violence in their search for sustenance.

That makes bins, rubbish dumps, and recycling centres a natural target for feathered death from above, and the one thing between them and their target are our day-glo clad heroes, armed with nothing but a broom and their wits.

People feeding the gulls, either in city centres or the seafront, only encourage them to associate human activity with food, to the point that they will swoop in and steal it out of your hand.

And it’s a psychological battle, as it’s very much frowned upon to actually hurt or kill a gull, so it’s more about deterrence than resorting to violence to end this bewildering war.

Mark Hall of Divert.co.uk say: “That means homeowners, landlords and businesses should make their rooftops unwelcoming for gulls so that numbers might gradually decline.

“Food waste should be well wrapped to prevent the birds getting a whiff of your half-eaten kebab.”

“But most of all – Tourists and city folk: PLEASE Stop feeding the gulls. We’ve seen enough pecking injuries in the refuse industry to last a lifetime.”

www.divert.co.uk


THE SUMMER ISSUE OF MMC MAGAZINE IS NOW AVAILABLE TO READ ONLINE

If you would like to receive free printed copies of MMC CLICK HERE to subscribe