Seamus Hoyne, dean of flexible and workplace learning at the Technological University of the Shannon

With smart infrastructure and zero-energy building on the agenda, new skills are in demand right across the construction sector. Paradoxically, however, due to high demand for new buildings and diminished numbers of skilled workers, many people working in the industry are unable to access traditional training as they are simply too busy.

Seamus Hoyne, dean of flexible and workplace learning at the Technological University of the Shannon (TUS), said the sector was still suffering from the lingering effects of the 2008 financial crisis.

“There were a couple of impacts. Firstly, a lot of people became unemployed and went elsewhere, so we lost a lot of experience and know-how. The second thing is, many people who came to work here from elsewhere in Europe returned home as the economies there started to grow. Thirdly, it created an image problem for construction and enrolment in construction related courses,” he said.

At the same time, though, the sector has been revolutionised, both by a technological revolution and the introduction of new building energy standards. As a result, new skills are now needed on-site.

“There have been radical changes,” Hoyne said.

“We have modern methods of construction and we have a lot of digitalisation of the construction process, in particular of the design phase. Our architects, engineers and quantity surveyors are much more digitised”.

The traditional trades are changing, too, Hoyne said, notably with a greater number of integrated systems due to smart energy systems into buildings.

“The pace of development of technology is extremely fast and this means people need to keep learning. In the past, if you were a construction worker then you needed less up-skilling. Now you need to be updating your knowledge over the course of your career,” he said.

“When you graduate from your apprenticeship, or your engineering or quantity surveying degree, you absolutely need life-long learning because of changes that are going to happen in the near future,” he said.

However, considering both the major labour shortage in construction and demand for building, it is essential, Hoyne said, that education and training providers needed to change how they delivered skills.

“Really flexible delivery and provision is now critical, particularly in the construction sector where we have full employment nationally. The sector is desperately looking for workers, so people have less time for training,” he said.

Both the higher education and further education sectors were responding to this, with innovative and flexible approaches that suited both learners and businesses alike.

“We have blended learning, with a portion online and a portion as ‘block release’ where people can do the practical aspects. You also have micro accreditations, where you can do blocks of learning to get a major award,” he said.

TUS, for example, embeds micro credentials in its programmes, and has now developed a Level 8 Higher Diploma in Energy Retrofitting.

“It’s looking at fabric, systems, and retrofit management. People can do those certifications on their own, do the whole diploma, or add the three up to the Higher Diploma,” he said.

This was only one example of how education was evolving to meet the country’s needs, Hoyne said. Another is the deepening links between the further and higher education sectors.

“For example, we are working closely with Waterford-Wexford ETB, Laois-Offaly ETB and others and we are offering a certificate in training in Zero-Energy Building for people who work in ETBs,” he said.

TUS also brings students to the National Construction Training Centre in Mount Lucas to take advantage of its facilities.

Putting it on show

The next step is getting the information out there, both to employers and prospective students. In order to do this, Hoyne will be among the attendees at a major event next month looking at how technology and training are intersecting, representing TUS.

Organised by the Digital Academy for the Sustainable Built Environment (DASBE) with partners including Atlantic Technological University, Irish Green Building Council and Tipperary Energy Agency, the Transforming Construction Skills conference, to be held on 9th May at the Midlands Park Hotel in Portlaoise, will bring together industry professionals, educators, professional organisations and researchers to discuss the range of upskilling available to construction professionals and to discover the latest trends and emerging technologies.

“We’ve three themes driving the content in the conference. One is around impact, one is around innovation, and the third is around integration,” he said.

Attendees will hear from students funded under the DASBE scheme as well as organisations and businesses who have collaborated in the development of programmes. Technologies on display will include virtual reality (VR) and digital twins.

“On integration, we’ll hear about how we have collaborated with ETBs [Education and Training Boards] on innovation, as well as on European initiatives,” Hoyne said.

Ultimately, he said, the conference will be a major step toward addressing both the skills shortage and the reality of how busy construction firms and their workers are.

“We don’t have enough quantity surveyors coming out of universities – they’re being snapped-up in third year or fourth year, [and] we don’t have enough people going into apprenticeships in plumbing and blockwork. We also have people working in the sector who need up-skilling who are very busy due to the shortage”.

The Transforming Construction Skills conference intends to put the solutions on show.

 

Source: Business Post

A BARNSLEY building material specialist has been recognised for his commitment to the industry.

Luke Hoyle, who’s based out at Carlton Manufacturing, has been named as one of the top 100 young achievers across the sector.

National trade body the Builders’ Merchants’ Federation (BMF) and Builders’ Merchants News (BMN), joined forces to identify the top 100 across the multi-billion pound building materials sector, and shine a light on the brightest stars of the future.

Luke said: “I feel very privileged to have been nominated as a Top 100 Young Achiever.

“Hard work really does pay off when you put your mind to it and I cannot wait to meet other like-minded people at the awards.”

Source: WeareBarnsley

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer and deputy leader Angela Rayner

are expected to set out their ‘golden rules’ for releasing green belt land (Jacob King/PA)

Labour to set out golden rules for grey belt in bid to boost housing

The party plans to release ugly, low-quality parts of the green belt to help meet its housebuilding targets if it wins power.

Labour is expected to set out five “golden rules” for building on the green belt in an effort to boost housebuilding while improving “genuine green spaces”.

The rules, to be laid out on Friday, include prioritising previously developed brownfield sites and areas of ugly or poor-quality land that the party has dubbed “grey belt”.

Labour has previously pledged to build 1.5 million homes over the course of the next Parliament, replicating the Conservatives’ 2019 promise to build 300,000 homes per year.

While the party has committed to a “brownfield-first approach”, its plans also include releasing some green belt land in areas without enough brownfield sites and where that land is of poor quality, such as in Tottenham where a development was blocked because a disused petrol station was designated as green belt.


We cannot build the homes Britain needs without also releasing some land currently classed as green belt – Sir Keir Starmer

 

Blaming the Conservatives for creating a “housing emergency” that is “engulfing a generation of hard-working aspirational people”, Sir Keir Starmer said his party would “get tough on the blockers”.

He said: “Labour supports brownfield-first policies. But we must be honest, we cannot build the homes Britain needs without also releasing some land currently classed as green belt.

“We’ll prioritise ugly, disused grey belt land, and set tough new conditions for releasing that land. Our golden rules will also ensure any grey belt development delivers affordable homes, new infrastructure and improved green spaces.”

As well as providing a “brownfield-first” approach and creating a “grey belt” category, Labour said it would require homes built on released land to provide at least 50% affordable housing and include plans to improve public services and local infrastructure.

The party will also rule out building on “genuine nature spots” and will require developers to include improvements to existing green spaces in their plans.

Deputy leader Angela Rayner said grey belt land

“should not be off limits while local people are kept off the housing ladder”, adding that much of the green belt “isn’t green, rolling hills, but poor-quality scrubland, mothballed on the outskirts of town”.

She said: “Labour has a plan for smarter green belt release, underpinned by strong rules to tackle the housing emergency and build the homes we need.”

Housebuilders have welcomed Labour’s plans, with National Housing Federation chief executive Kate Henderson saying it is

“right to consider how our approach to the green belt can better serve our country and our communities”.

She said: “We strongly support plans to use this ‘grey belt’ to tackle the housing crisis, and to deliver a minimum of 50% affordable homes.”

Richard Beresford, chief executive of the National Federation of Builders, said:

“Prioritising grey belt and pairing it with golden rules would ensure green space loss is mitigated, vital supporting infrastructure is delivered and both builders and local people get planning and place-making certainty.

“It’s a win for all parties, which is why we support it.”

Housebuilding has risen since the last election, with 202,300 new homes started in 2022/23 compared to 187,870 in 2019/20, returning to levels last seen just before the financial crash.

But planning applications have fallen since the middle of 2022, with Labour blaming the planning system and the Government’s decision to scrap mandatory housing targets in the face of backbench pressure.

Natural England chairman Tony Juniper has also advocated limited building on the green belt, telling The Guardian last year an “oppositional mindset” does not reflect reality.

Conservative Party Chairman, Richard Holden MP said the announcement was a

 

“desperate attempt to distract from the Angela Rayner scandal and Sir Keir Starmer’s failure to get a grip of the details”.

He added: “Labour’s policy is to ignore the concerns and voices of local people. It is the same approach they took to ULEZ and that is why they will fail.

“Only Rishi Sunak and the Conservatives will respect local communities building the right homes in the right places which has delivered one million homes over this Parliament and sticking to the plan to reduce inflation and get mortgage rates down to help first-time buyers.”

Source: Shropshire Star


The UK should learn from successful planning policies that have deliberately prioritised affordable housing and are ambitious in nature, such as those implemented in the American city of Minneapolis.

In a paper out today, the Social Market Foundation reviews evidence from comparable English-speaking countries – the USA, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand – and finds that planning reforms often fail due to insufficient ambition and a failure to insist upon affordability requirements for new construction.

Planning reform is increasingly seen as the ‘silver bullet’ to addressing the UK’s housing woes, with politicians promising that it will make homebuilding easier, increasing supply and, through that, decreasing price. Labour has pledged to increase housing capacity by requiring authorities in England to meet housing demand and, if necessary, stepping in to local plans to increase the capacity of existing property. Housing Secretary Michael Gove recently updated brownfield planning regulations – but due to the limited scope of his changes, the plan is likely to increase housing stock in selected towns and cities by just 0.78%, and increase UK housing stock by a mere 0.5%, SMF analysis notes.

Evidence from United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand suggests that planning reform in these countries often fails to increase supply, and even where it does, it is uncertain if prices come down:

  • In California, supply failed to increase because policymakers watered down regulations by limiting eligibility and reducing the covered areas. Further limits to building size, area, density, and design continues to slow housing construction.
  • Even where new units are built, there is no guarantee they will be affordable. New York, Chicago, Seattle, and Brisbane all saw prices increase in areas where planning was reformed. This was the result of land value increasing, pushing up prices and pushing out residents.

The planning reform strategy adopted in Minneapolis shows the way forward, and should be emulated by the UK, the SMF said. Minneapolis targeted both supply and demand.

  • To increase supply: city officials slashed burdensome minimum parking requirements, which would have meant losing many acres of land for parking space or costly basement car parks, while embarking on planning reforms between 2009 and 2018. Construction doubled over that time, and it now leads midwestern cities for dwelling units permitted.
  • On the demand side: rental assistance and subsidies were increased, and affordable housing regulations introduced, so that prices remained low. Minneapolis’ affordability requirements follow a 60-30-20 rule, ensuring households earning 60% of the local area’s median income do not need to pay more than 30% of their wages on rent or mortgage payments in 20% of units. Rents have since stabilised, rising just 1% since 2017 while the average US rent increased 30%.

By boosting supply while introducing affordability requirements, Minneapolis has stopped the persistent price increases seen elsewhere, the SMF notes.

For planning reform to succeed in ensuring more genuinely affordable housing in the UK, government strategy has to be two-fold. To ensure reforms lead to more units being built, plans must be ambitious and holistic. They must apply to large geographic areas (such as cities or local authorities) and changed regulations must remove technical barriers like height limits, parking minimums, and floor-space requirements which are preventing multi-units from being built, while protecting quality and wellbeing. Secondly, to ensure the supply is affordable, current housing affordability requirements – which are simply based on 20% of the market rate – should be  replaced,  the SMF recommends.

Essentially, policymakers should:

  • Ensure any planning reforms are ambitious enough to greatly increase supply at the scale required by:
    • Maximising the land which is available to housing development
    • Maximising the unit density which can be built on this land
  • Undertake a holistic approach to planning reform in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and local plans by:
    • Recognising the need for granular reforms such as parking requirements, height minimums, and other constraints not targeted by certain reforms
    • Making certain regulations related to planning reform, capacity, and affordability mandatory for Local Planning Authorities
  • Introduce blanket planning reforms rather than a piecemeal approach by:
  • Applying reforms made to the NPPF across the UK and, where relevant, devolved nations
  • Ensuring design codes and targets are introduced at a Local Authority level, and avoiding more specific targetting
  • Include demand-side interventions which mandate affordability to avoid the gentrification that can result from planning reform by:
    • Establishing a definition of affordable housing based on household income and median local wages
    • Increasing the size and eligibility of housing benefits or by increasing the proportion of new housing units which must be made affordable

 

This SMF paper looking at planning reform, is the final part in a series, kindly funded by the Nuffield Foundation, exploring housing policy solutions across the Anglosphere (English-speaking countries). Previous papers explored homeownership financial policies, social housing and co-ops, and rental rights and support.

 

Gideon Salutin, Senior Researcher at Social Market Foundation, said:
“Contrary to popular belief, planning reform will not automatically unlock housing supply and make homes affordable. Advocates and politicians promising big payoffs are making a risky gamble.

It would be better to implement planning reforms more strategically, and have affordability baked into it so that new units are affordable. Planning reform needs to be ambitious in scale, remove all barriers to maximise dense building, and mandate affordability – to even get a start on addressing our housing woes. We have seen this strategy work in Minneapolis, and we should look to emulate it.”

Sam Richards, founder of Britain Remade, said:

“Reforming the planning system is the most important pro-growth policy lever we have. So, It’s vital that we get it right by learning from the reforms that actually got more homes built in cities around the world.

Not only is the lack of housing stopping people getting on the housing ladder, it’s crippling economic growth. If we build the homes Britain needs, tens of billions of pounds would be pumped into the economy, thousands of jobs would be created and Treasury coffers would swell. Politicians must act otherwise they’re condemning a generation of young people to sky-high rents while the dream of homeownership withers and dies.”

Dr Catherine Dennison, Programme Head at Nuffield Foundation, said:

“The next UK government will face a long list of challenges on housing, and planning policy will be a key area for reform. The SMF’s analysis tells us other countries have struggled with this, but crucially provides guiding principles from more successful international examples. The Foundation is funding this project ahead of the general election, to supply analytical context to contribute to the development of policies and pledges by political parties, and inform voters.”

Source: Social Market Foundation

By Martin Guttridge-Hewitt

 

Travelling via northern Sweden, we explore the potential of wooden structures to reduce carbon footprints, and ask if a new UK roadmap can finally unlock the material’s potential to drive net zero development.

It’s an early-February evening and Skellefteå is bathed in the glow of streetlights and pure white snow. Life here feels frozen in a moment, which at -15C on arrival, is completely understandable.

But appearances deceive, and this corner of the subarctic moves fast. As the region’s Market and Business Development Manager, Bo Wilkstrom tells us, specialised industries are fuelling rapid population growth, and turning this small town into Sweden’s net zero transition testbed. Authorities now have a big ambition to ‘become global frontrunner, take risks, and build a new society’ around principles of renewability and sustainability. Some people even come as tourists because they ‘want to see, want to know’ about the latest climate tech, transport, and energy developments.

Most visitors will arrive through the carbon neutral airport, which is also home to one of the world’s only electric aviation schools, using planes it is hoped will one day be the go-to modality for short distance commutes. Many take buses that run on entirely organic waste. All will use 100% renewable electricity for the duration of their time here, and the lucky ones might stay at Wood Hotel by Elite.

The second tallest timber-framed tower on the planet, this 20-storey prefabricated skyscraper also houses Sara Kulturhus, an arts venue with six stages, the largest seating 1,700 people, and a ground floor foyer doubling up as indoor public realm, serving everything from Sunday morning yoga to pre-theatre drinks, safely protected from the perishing conditions outside. Skellefteå’s municipal library is here, too.

Lumber had a huge impact on the footprint of this address. Considered among the most advanced timber buildings ever created, it absorbs more carbon dioxide (CO2) that it emits, even when all 205 rooms are occupied. In total, 12,000 m3 of wood was used, sourced from within 60km of the hotel. Forests that supplied other projects in town, like the historic Lejonströmsbron wooden bridge, dated 1737, and a modern three-storey car park made of plywood.

In Sweden, 70% of land is forest, and the timber industry is well managed and environmentally controlled. Producing 18million m3 of lumber each year, even with 13million bound for export there’s enough to produce 90% of all low-rise builds in the country. And larger scale developments are also becoming increasingly visible, like Stockholm’s aptly named Wood City.

‘There are timber buildings in London, but most have traditional steel frame and concrete core,’

Charlie Green, co-founder of The Office Group, says of the Black & White Building in an interview with Financial Times. The British capital’s tallest commercial address made from engineered timber, it has 37% less embodied carbon than it would, had denser materials, more commonly used in UK construction, been used.

Savings come from several aspects specific to structural wood. Timber is less energy-intensive to produce than concrete, and as lumber is far lighter it means shorter build times – on average 25% faster than heavier structures. As such, there are fewer journeys needed to transport the workforce and materials, less days when direct on-site emissions are produced, while particulate matter falls because there is no concrete being cut.

‘I was at a conference last week on constructing excellence in London, and completely unsolicited one of the speakers said to me: ‘the bottom line is we’ve got to use less concrete, less steel, and more timber’. That would have been my message, but for an independent procurement expert to talk like that, I think the penny has dropped in terms of benefits from timber construction,’

says Andrew Carpenter, Chief Executive of the UK Structural Timber Association. A man who clearly wants to see more wood in UK building stock, support from outside has rarely been higher.

In December, the UK Government published its Timber in construction roadmap, which aims to level up huge regional differences in the prevalence of timber buildings. In England, just 9% of new build homes have a wooden frame, go to Scotland and it’s 92%. The new plan will also help deliver on a legally binding target of 16.8% forest cover in England by 2050, helping support habitat recovery and reverse the country’s shocking biodiversity crisis.

Several steps are critical to meeting the objectives. These include improving data on timber and whole life carbon to ascertain more details on true benefits, promoting and improving access to sustainable and safe products, including ‘free from’ timbers which overcome indoor air pollution issues linked to certain glues and solvents, facilitating closer collaboration between stakeholders, and innovating new high performance construction systems.

‘After COP26 in Glasgow, the UK Government, headed by DEFRA, set up a working group to increase the amount of timber in construction because they recognise that if the UK is to meet its net zero target, construction materials must be a priority,’ explains Carpenter, who is now secretariat to the roadmap process, representing the timber industry. ‘Now there is a clear route, and we’re only a month or two in but the commitment Government is showing is first class.

‘I’ve put together the planned process to manage implementation and they seem to be behind that, so it’s early doors but the signs are good,’ he continues. ‘Other sectors [outside housebuilding] are also looking at timber. So, there is desire from the Department of Education to use timber in its school-building programme. The health sector is looking at timber for hospitals, we’re really beginning to see a lot of areas start to consider this frame as an option.’

Other parts of the economy – such as hotels and student accommodation providers – have longer histories with timber, although it’s only relatively recently the material fell out of favour with English developers, and buyers. A 2018 report in UK Construction Online suggests the market was growing pre-pandemic, but still hadn’t recovered from a huge crash in the 1980s driven by negative reports about quality and safety. The timber construction sector plummeted from 40% of new build market share to less than 10% in a single year, only reaching 28% again in the last decade or so. Faith is gradually being restored through hard evidence.

‘The first question that is often asked of us is around fire safety,’ Carpenter replies when we quiz him on concerns people might have with using structural timber. ‘We have significant results, for both timber frame and more recently CLT [cross-laminated timber], which show if a building is designed properly and built properly, in accordance with best practice, there’s no reason there should be any more fire risk than with other materials.

‘Cost is probably the second objection. But an independent test carried out by a quantity surveyor, RLB, looking at social housing developments, found timber frames were actually 1% cheaper than alternatives, and 19% faster to finish. Similar research has found it to be 2% cheaper, but the reality is on price materials are almost like-for-like,’ he continues, before revealing this data is now being expanded.  ‘As part of the new roadmap the Government has asked us to do a more comprehensive cost comparison, broadening the scope beyond social housing alone, so that should be interesting to see the results.’

In a world without silver bullets, Carpenter is clear that timber alone will not solve the quandary of how to continue making new buildings while protecting the planet and our atmosphere. So while ‘an ideal world’ for him might involve completely substituting concrete and steel, he says this is unlikely to prove practical. Instead, it’s as much about bringing more wood into the mix as it is pushing a ‘timber first policy’. Simply put, ‘you must choose materials appropriate for the given solution’.

‘We know there are going to be several barriers along the way, challenges that will need to be overcome. We’ve broken this down into seven working groups dealing with supply, demand, carbon, building safety, insurance, skills, and innovation. For the last two years we’ve had working groups looking at each of these, and that fed directly into the roadmap,’ Carpenter continues. ‘We’ve had industry experts involved every step of the way; you know?

‘From RIBA to the HSE, Home Builders Federation, the timber sector, wider industry, and so on. Nothing has been done in isolation. It’s been done with government departments, trade, but also the wider sectors,’ he adds. ‘So, I don’t think we’ve missed anything. The important thing now is we have a number of recommendations, some for government, some for industry, some for both. For me, it’s a question of ticking them off one by one and agreeing a plan for each to implement their steps.’

Of course, the outcome of the roadmap will only become apparent over the course of several years, but Downing Street clearly needs this program to deliver for many reasons. Not least tackling the 25% of total national greenhouse gas emissions that come from Britain’s built environment, bolstering efforts to increase tree cover in a country that’s among the world’s most biodiversity-depleted, and increasing the supply of new housing stock to help mitigate what now feels like a crisis in perpetuity.

It all seems like a win-win, but to be truly effective implementation must be focused on long term outcomes. Like growing a sustainable domestic industry, taking full advantage of the predicted rise in demand driven by this new Government initiative. And investing in improving and expanding the available workforce, with staff shortages currently the biggest non-climate challenge facing construction as a whole.

Perhaps most importantly, though, this roadmap must be met by a willingness to stay committed on all sides of the political sphere, or we risk taking two steps forward, and one step back, repeating the vicious cycle of false starts and abandoned ideas which has plagued environmental policy in the UK and globally. The outcome of which has been precious time wasted, squandered opportunities, and financial black holes. Patterns we can ill-afford to repeat.

Source: Environment Journal

  • The UK’s public sector spending spree is slowing down, taking pressure off an overheated construction sector.
  • Overall UK&I cities ranked highly; all sat within the top 25 in the world, except Belfast (28th)
  • Although levels of inflation were moderate in the UK, specification enhancements related to building safety, sustainability and client expectation pushed prices up further than most other locations.
  • Bristol entered the top 10 for the first time.

London has narrowly overtaken Geneva to top the rankings once again as the most expensive city in the world in which to build, according to the latest Arcadis 2024 International Construction Costs (ICC) report, released by the global design and engineering consultancy today.

According to the study of comparative construction costs across 100 global cities, enhanced specifications associated with safety and sustainability have been pushing prices upwards, causing London to overtake Geneva (2nd) in the rankings, closely followed by Zurich (3rd) and Munich (4th). Rising costs and double-digit price growth in Munich have propelled the Bavarian capital significantly up the rankings, this year surpassing major US cities like New York (5th) and San Francisco (6th) in terms of relative cost to build.

The 2024 Arcadis International Construction Costs Index covers 100 of the world’s large cities across six continents. The cost comparison was developed covering twenty different building types, including residential, commercial, and public sector developments, and is based on a survey of construction costs, a review of market conditions and the professional judgement of Arcadis’ global team of experts. The calculations are based in USD and indexed against the price range for each building type relative to Amsterdam.

2023 was a difficult year across the world, with high borrowing costs undercutting the positive impact of infrastructure investment in many countries. However, with markets stabilising and inflation beginning to ease, we are at a pivotal moment in the recovery of the global construction sector. Increasing demand for labor, materials, and power mean that productivity is now becoming an increasingly critical factor in investment decisions and project viability.

Arcadis notes in particular the rapid acceleration of investment into the advanced manufacturing and technology sector, including data centers, pharmaceutical facilities, gigafactories and wafer-fabs. The sheer scale and complexity of these end-date-critical projects inevitably results in more financial risk, meaning that clients need to evolve their design, procurement, and construction capabilities even as these multi-billion-dollar programs are being built.

On the whole, cities in the UK and Ireland (UK&I) ranked highly for construction costs. All sat within the top 25 most expensive construction locations in the world, except Belfast which ranked 28th. Although levels of inflation were moderate in the UK, specification enhancements related to building safety, sustainability and client expectation pushed prices up further than most other locations. Viability challenges have continued to affect projects, even as inflation has fallen.  New regulations focused on low carbon emissions and improved building safety also created uncertainty and added to project costs. Uncertainty could continue in 2024, given local, mayoral and national elections are due in the coming months.

Tight fiscal conditions will see increasing pressure on the public purse in 2024 and beyond, with real-terms cuts in government capital investment currently projected until 2029. Whilst optimism as measured by the construction PMI has improved, the legacy of a weak order book from 2023 will delay recovery until late 2024 before the positive sentiment is realised. The infrastructure sector looks set to offer the greatest future opportunity, particularly investment in networks including energy transition projects and a large-scale, £96 billion planned investment in the regulated water sector.  In both sectors, capacity constraints will contribute to higher inflation and may impact the ability to deliver all projects and programmes in the period.

Simon Rawlinson, Head of Research and Strategic Insight at Arcadis said:

“The UK’s reduced public sector spending has eased pressure on an overheated construction industry amid slow growth. With minimal GDP growth and high interest rates, the sector faces viability challenges due to regulatory and election uncertainties. As fiscal conditions tighten, private sector collaboration is crucial for investment and urban renewal. Despite challenges, infrastructure, particularly in energy transition and water projects, shows promise. The cancellation of later HS2 rail phases has led to transport spending disruptions and fund reallocation.”

Peter Hogg, UK Cities Director at Arcadis, added:

“London’s resurgence to the top spot in the ICC 100 index for 2024 reflects the capital’s resilience in the face of challenging conditions. Despite a 10% year-on-year decline in construction output and a significant 20% drop in housing, the Commercial sub-sector experienced a notable 24% rise, largely attributed to retrofit activity. However, the capital has faced declining orders for new work since 2022, exacerbated by high interest rates impacting scheme viability and regulatory changes causing design and planning delays and cost escalations.”

Source: Arcadis

 

GEZE UK is delighted to announce that the company has been accredited as a Living Wage Employer.

 

The real Living Wage is the only UK wage rate based on the cost of living. It is voluntarily paid by over 14,000 UK businesses who believe their staff deserve a wage which meets everyday needs.

To achieve the accreditation GEZE UK had to confirm that the company pays the real Living Wage to all directly employed staff and have a plan in place to pay all contractors a Living wage – both of which the company has done.

Paying the real Living Wage is not only a benefit to staff but to the company too – it improves the employer brand and boosts staff productivity and motivation at work. It also helps employers to remain competitive, retain existing staff and attract new staff.

 

Rachel Boxall, Finance Director of GEZE UK, said:

“We decided to go for the Living Wage accreditation as we think it is an excellent way to demonstrate our commitment to being a responsible employer. By paying the real Living Wage (as opposed to the national living wage set by Government) we are voluntarily taking a stand to ensure employees can earn a wage which is enough to live on.

There is also growing evidence of the business benefits of becoming a Living Wage employer. This is demonstrated by the number of well-known and diverse companies already accredited such as Liverpool FC, Aviva, Oxfam and Ikea.“

 

Andrew Gordon, Programme Officer, Living Wage Foundation added

“We are delighted to welcome GEZE UK as an accredited member of the foundation. Basic fairness is at the heart of what the Living Wage campaign is trying to achieve and why great businesses and organisations chose to go further than the government minimum.”


CLICK HERE for more information on the Living Wage Foundation

 

For more information on GEZE UK CLICK HERE to visit the website

 

OR CLICK HERE to email GEZE UK

 

SFS Group Fastening Technology has launched an innovative new range of single ply membrane fasteners, in three sizes featuring a unique self-coring washer design, with a choice of two head drives and hardened drill points plus two types of slimline drive bar and other benefits; all aimed at giving the installer full confidence in securing the widely used, triple layer, insulated panels.   

 

SFS’s new SXP range is being introduced in three variants with the 25mm SXP2 intended to secure panel overlaps, while the 35mm SXP5’s proportionately longer point is for drilling into light-gauge steel, and the 47mm SXP14 delivers the greatest drilling capacity to tackle heavy gauge steel.

 

Produced in stainless steel with either Torx or Hex drive, all three have thread-free or free spin zones which prevent over-driving while also avoiding the fastener being loosened through vibration or thermal movement.  Crucially, the carefully engineered self-coring washer cuts a clear pathway through the insulation layer to avoid any unnecessary damage and help maintain the thermal integrity of the panel.

 

 

Product Manager Francesca McGibbon commented:

“Our new SXP range represents a significant advancement on our previous offering for securing single ply membrane panels with the SXP2 being the new variant: a clamping fastener or ‘stitcher’ for panel overlaps. Our range has been designed for optimised performance in their specific application, thus providing an effective solution for all your needs. Originally, the fasteners used a Torx drive, but we have now added a Hex drive so there’s more flexibility and, therefore, greater confidence for installers.  Then, because of the way that the SXP range is designed, it achieves a much cleaner entry through the membrane, thanks to the self-coring washer.  Essentially its ‘corkscrew’ motion achieves a clear passage and minimum disruption to the insulation, which helps maintain the U-value of the roof build up.”

 

 

Trialling of the product, which has been developed specifically for the UK market, has produced positive reactionsThe SXP range is further supported by having secured an EPD while the SXP5 and SXP14 carry FM approval.  SFS Group Fastening Technology can provide full specification and technical support for the new range as well as data sheets and other supporting literature while sample packs are also available.

 


CLICK HERE for further information

OR, call 0330 0555888

 

 


 

Following the ONS announcement that construction output had fallen by 1.9% in February, the Federation of Master Builders (FMB) has given its reaction to the data.

 

The organisation said the statistics were a warning that ‘the construction sector was still battling in a difficult economic climate.’

Brian Berry, CEO at the FMB said:

“It is concerning to see another decline in construction output of 1.9% this month, and this is compounded by the overall decrease of 1.0% in the three months to February.

“While growth had been seen in January, these figures underline the challenging winter period that UK construction has faced — it is particularly concerning that this decline was in part led by a drop in repair and maintenance work, a sector that had been doing well last year, comparatively to other sub-sectors.Bottom of Form

“Survey responses from the ONS research suggest that this was down to poor weather conditions, with heavy rainfall hindering many projects, and we’ll have to see if warmer spring weather brings a welcome boost for builders.”

“Despite overall GDP being up slightly this month for the wider UK economy, the decline in construction output is holding back substantial improvement.

“As we head into the drier months, the government needs to take this opportunity to help boost that construction activity, which could take the form of helping to step up house building and measures to help owner owners make their homes more energy efficient — these two measures would help drive economic growth.”

 

Source: Development Finance Today

 

 

James Hardie, the world leader in the manufacture of high-performance fibre cement and fibre gypsum building solutions, has appointed Edward Dunn as Channel Manager to further support trade partners in the North.

Ed has nearly 10 years account management experience working for large national accounts and independent wholesalers.  In his most recent role he worked for Glen Dimplex Flame Europe where he was responsible for sales in the North & Scotland.

As Channel Manager Ed will identify and drive future growth opportunities for James Hardie products, fostering relationships with key stakeholders at distributors, installers, and contractors in the region.

Ed commented:

“I wanted to join a fast-paced company where there was scope to develop my role and make a real difference. James Hardie has a great product portfolio and clear strategy for aggressive business growth.  Since I started with the company I’ve been inspired by my colleagues’ attitudes and the support from the senior management team.  I look forward to contributing to the company’s success in the future.”

 

“The creation of this role underscores our commitment to delivering excellent customer service for our clients and partners,” said Lee Bucknall, UK Sales Manager at James Hardie.  “Ed’s account management experience in the Northern region will help us to develop relationships with the channel, and grow our market share in the area.”

 

www.jameshardie.co.uk