Tarmac and Forth Ports have signed a long-term agreement to create the UK’s largest construction materials terminal at the Port of Tilbury in Essex.

The long-term agreement follows a £250M pound investment made by Forth Ports at Tilbury2, the UK’s newest port.

The facility is a purpose-built aggregate processing and manufacturing facility, located to serve London and the South East, with multimodal connectivity.

The riverside location combined with a dedicated railhead means efficient delivery of construction materials into central London without the use of heavy road haulage, supporting Tarmac’s commitment to reducing emissions and creating a safer environment for other road users.

Tarmac senior vice president Peter Buckley said: “Construction materials have a critical role to play in helping deliver the major infrastructure and construction projects which are supporting the UK’s economic recovery and long-term development.

“Our agreement with Forth Ports underlines a continued focus by Tarmac to develop industry leading facilities which will support these schemes, with the Build Back Better agenda and a clear commitment to driving sustainability and enhanced efficiencies.”

Forth Ports chief executive Charles Hammond added: “This is an exciting time for Tilbury2 as we sign a significant, long term agreement with Tarmac to create the UK’s largest construction materials terminal.

“This facility will be a game changer in the coronavirus economic recovery campaign to Build Back Better and is a good example of high productivity investment adding value to raw materials.

“I am pleased that the signing of this agreement comes at the same time as we have been awarded Freeport status, which will bring further investment and jobs to the area.”

Source: New Civil Engineer

 

 

Recognition for innovation from the FLTA

Combilift, the Irish manufacturer of a wide range of handling solutions, has won its 10th prestigious industry award from the Forklift Truck Association for one of its latest products. The 2020 FLTA Awards for Excellence took place virtually on Saturday 10th April, having been postponed from last year due to Covid,

The recently introduced Combi-CBE model – the world’s first counterbalance design, multidirectional forklift with electric drive on all of its three wheels, was one of the twelve finalists in the hotly contested Innovation Category. According to the host of this year’s Awards, “this is the category that everyone wants to win, as you get to feel incredibly clever.” So Combilift was immensely proud that the jury singled it out as the outright winner.

The Combi-CBE features internationally patented electric traction which enables independent control of each of the front and rear drive wheels and guarantees 100% traction control, which negates the need for differential lock when it is operating on wet or slippery surfaces. As the truck drives and steers, the speed and rotational direction of the wheels are controlled independently. Operators benefit from precise acceleration and deceleration control, which significantly reduces long load momentum twisting when travelling sideways. Each electric drive incorporates parking and regenerative dynamic braking for power efficiency and AC drive means that there are no mechanical brushes to maintain or replace.

Combining the benefits of very compact dimensions and the ability to handle long loads as well as pallets, the multidirectional Combi-CBE is a universal truck for multiple applications and offers cost effective and efficient operation. It also answers growing market demand for powerful and quieter electric forklifts which comply with ever more stringent emissions guidelines. The FLTA commented as follows: “a clever and innovative design, Combilift’s entry impressed the panel with its unique, independent front and rear wheel drive, letting it handle long loads in the tightest spaces while minimising tyre wear.”

 

 

Combilift CEO and Co-Founder Martin McVicar said: “Innovation is a cornerstone of Combilift’s product development and, given the large number of excellent finalists this year, we would like to thank the FLTA jury of industry experts for recognising our achievements.”

www.combilift.com

 

 

Majority of developers are optimistic their projects won’t be impacted by Brexit this year

Some 66% of developers do not expect any of their developments to be negatively impacted this year as a result of the Brexit deal, according to the latest DFT poll. Just over a third (34%) think it will adversely affect them.

With the pandemic causing the closure and slowdown of many development sites during the past year, alongside numerous lenders pulling out of the market or putting their funding on hold, developers have had a difficult period starting or completing their projects. As we emerge from the dark shadow of Covid restrictions, will Brexit become the next hurdle to hold the development market back?

Phil Gould, principal at Avamore Capital, emphasised that the impact of the UK’s separation from the EU had been felt long before Brexit formally took place. “Soon after the 2016 referendum, the market saw reports around the reduction of available labour from the EU workforce; furthermore, developers were already experiencing the impacts of increased material costs due to fluctuating exchange rates against the euro. Cost overruns and unexpected delays were a clear consequence of Brexit uncertainty before this year (indicated by the launch of our finish and exit product in 2019, which was designed to address exactly these points) and so, we witnessed developers working to the circumstances around them. This year, Brexit consequences may be set to intensify, but developers have had the luxury of time and been able to foresee some of these issues arising, and therefore make appropriate allowances.”

While the housing shortage persists, interest rates remain low, the availability of funding remains high, and the government continues to support the construction sector through planning reform and economic support, it stands to reason why developers are still hopeful.

It’s all about residential

Clearly, there is currently more confidence in the residential sector, which likely reflects the lack of supply, compared with the commercial property market. According to the January 2021 Land Registry UK House Price Index, the average property price stood at £249,309 — a 7.5% rise year-on-year. The North West witnessed the strongest growth, where prices increased by 12%.

“We obviously have an enormous shortage of housing, and it is difficult to see that changing any time soon,” said Adam Tauber, specialist underwriter of development finance at Crystal Specialist Finance. He added that there has been a surge of commercial-to-residential developments and expects this type of conversion to be unaffected by Brexit.

Robert Orr, managing director at Paragon Development Finance, points to the extension of the stamp duty holiday as having provided further stimulus, while the new iteration of the Help to Buy scheme will support those looking to purchase their first home. “Many people have been forced to spend much more time at home and that has helped them reconsider what they want from their property, including quality of finish and efficiency of space, which can be better catered for by new-build homes,” he commented.

“Developers are also marketing property in an environment of constrained supply. Housing stock for sale is below historical levels as people have held off putting their homes up for sale during a pandemic, so this has created a strong environment for developers when combined with an upsurge in buyer demand.”

Roxana Mohammadian-Molina, CSO at Blend Network, commented that government support for first-time buyers has created renewed optimism among developers, “especially those focused on building houses in the more affordable price tranche.”

Access to finance has also improved, with liquidity from credit funds, banks and PE firms flooding back into the development market. In addition, mortgage availability is returning to normal levels and higher LTVs, and the government’s new 95% mortgage guarantee scheme will also assist the buyer market and give developers confidence they have secure exits for their sites. “Being able to access competitive finance has allowed developers to generate good returns on projects, and many are confident investing for the longer term, where returns will be realised in 18-24 months,” reported Cameron Hayes, asset finance adviser of structured finance at Arc & Co.

Prime real estate, especially in central London, is also still seen as an attractive asset for investment and development on a global scale. “Due to the prime market’s resilience, we have seen great optimism from our developer community,” confirmed Uma Rajah, CEO at CapitalRise. Over the past 12 months, the lender’s loan book has benefitted from double-digit growth, having screened over £5.4bn of deals in 2020.

“The pandemic and Brexit did not stop the progression of our projects; in fact, all development sites CapitalRise is currently funding have remained open throughout the various lockdowns and works continue to progress well. The prime property market is strongly linked to international buyers and investors rather than European ones, so the Brexit impact on demand in the sector is expected to be minimal.”

While the huge spike in national debt and rising unemployment could also affect the property market’s confidence and buyer behaviour, Uma believes that the shortage of housing stock and having been in lockdown for much of the past year mean that people are keen to get moving. “For CapitalRise, Brexit is priced into our valuations and has been for a long time. [Provided] developers stay true to the business model that works best for them and they are realistic to the headwinds that lie ahead, then in partnership with a dependable lender, they should still be able to see their projects to completion and, ultimately, profitable success.”

Richard Jones, managing director at Pilot Fish Finance, is seeing a rise in demand for rural homes with outdoor space, which offers developers an opportunity to move into new markets. “Equally, with so many commercial spaces now sitting empty, developers have an opportunity to redesign our high streets,” he said.

The growth in the BTR sector has also given developers access to institutional buyers and new sources of capital, such as forward funding or purchase structures. “This sector will only grow in volume and size as time goes by,” commented Steven Oliver, COO at Peritus Corporate Finance.

While the full impact of Brexit is yet unknown, it is likely to be felt through increased prices in raw materials and possible labour shortages, feeding into higher wage and materials costs across the sector. Positively, this could drive down residual land values and the price developers pay for sites — something which is an ongoing problem.

“There’s no doubt that it is becoming harder for developers to complete schemes on time and on budget,” said James Bloom, director at Alternative Bridging Corporation. “A combination of Brexit and the pandemic has increased the costs of materials and created long waits for some items, while sites need to allow for social distancing guidelines.”

Planning ahead for both the build and arranging finance is therefore vital. “It’s likely that many developers are going to reach the expiration of their development finance arrangements before they are ready to move on from a scheme, and so it’s important to look into refinancing options early.”

“Our well educated and experienced approach to risk helped us to plan ahead for the likelihood of a hard Brexit,” said Uma. “CapitalRise has always undertaken a rigorous assessment process for new loans. In doing so, we actively challenge what the true costs, programme and demand is for any one project given the location and demographic, together with the validity of comparable evidence.” To date, while it has seen labour shortages and rising costs, the work it undertakes at the outset has held the lender and its borrowers in good shape — “forewarned is forearmed!”

Robert highlighted that the experienced developers Paragon supports have been building in levels of contingency across the board, whether for costs, programme times, or both. “There is also optimism that some of the European labour force who returned to their home countries during lockdown will come back as travel restrictions ease. This doesn’t look to be imminent as the roll-out of vaccines in European countries has been slower, but it will eventually stabilise.”

He also thinks that this is an opportunity for the industry to ask itself how it can appeal to new people and make construction and the property industry an attractive place to work. “Work is already underway to improve diversity in construction and I’d like to see that accelerated,” Robert added.

Phil thinks that there could be an increase in the number of apprentices construction workers take on to fill the skills gap.

As part of the Brexit negotiations, the UK agreed a trade deal with Europe so that the import of building materials from the EU was not subject to additional tariffs. “By signing the UK/EU trade deal, price increases due to increased tariffs has been mitigated,” Steven said.

“With regard to materials, obviously, a lot is sourced from outside the UK, and this results in delivery delays and potential increased costs from the Brexit fallout,” added Eli Korman, head of development finance and chief investment officer at TAB. “However, these are just hurdles — not barriers. Developers and their funders need to keep this in mind and ensure their cost plans are robust and have enough contingency to counteract any impact.”

Steven highlighted that the European lockdown has seen shortages of items such as timber and plasterboard, and factories running at reduced capacities will only extend this supply chain problem.

We might see more developers sticking to traditional building methods and materials. “Despite regional variations across the country, traditional materials sourced locally will be the key to preserve costs and, in some cases, reduce overall costs and increase profit for developers,” stated Adam.

On the other hand, we may see more borrowers expanding their supply chain. Cameron divulges that  Arc & Co has witnessed developers sourcing materials from further afield, particularly from some parts of Asia. Developers may also look at ways to agree UK-based supply chains if they have not done so before.

“Clients are looking more intently at their supply chains than ever before and planning procurement far in advance of their needs, to allow time to account for any delays or hold ups while import issues are worked out,” stated Henry South, head of construction insurance at London Belgravia Brokers.

Asim Shirwani, CCO at Lendhub, said that savvy developers will find savings elsewhere, such as through stronger negotiations with contractors on build costs, or cheaper finance packages from lenders.

“From a Brexit standpoint, increased paperwork in relation to imported materials will add further pressure to developers and may also add to delays,” stated Steven. This could lead to more developers using reclaimed materials, which could help save money in the long term, reduce our reliance on EU trade and be better for the environment.

Scott Marshall, founder and managing director of Roma Finance, agrees that developers will adapt and become more efficient in delivering their products. “We are seeing this already; the construction of an individual house is a lot quicker than it was 10 years ago. Off-site manufacturing and modern methods of construction are becoming more commonplace and will only accelerate this.” He pointed out that they also offer huge cost savings, efficiencies and environmental benefits. “I think we will see more of these types of properties.”

What developers should be cautious about this year

There have been reports of a backlog and reduced availability across professional services, such as solicitors, valuers and local authorities, due to high demand and potentially less resource due to the pandemic. This could mean that developers face challenges reaching planning decisions and having valuations undertaken quickly.

Adam believes that developers will be looking at greenfield sites because of brownfield areas being too costly to clear. However, they are likely to face local resistance and planning challenges. “More due diligence and conversations with planning officers will have to be part of a standard development appraisal,” he highlighted. The availability of sites and appropriate infrastructure will also continue to be problematic, with further planning reforms needed.

The biggest hurdle for developers could be around catering for the consumer and the individual needs in a particular area — something which has changed a lot during the health crisis. “Developers needs to think inclusively and not [have a] bottom line, ‘What’s in it for me?’ attitude,” Adam said. This is especially true when looking at the affordability of housing.

Scott references how the profiles of buyers are changing. “There are now more single-person households of all ages, including older people. How do we cater for them? It’s not just about building more homes; we need to be building the right kinds of homes.”

This is also compounded by the requirement for more space at home and the paradigm shift of flexible working. “This will have an impact on consumer demand and the way developers and their professional teams look at designing buildings,” said Cameron. “Squeezing more units into a development may no longer be the best way to maximise return — especially if they take longer to sell.”

Covid has made many people question the desire and need for city centre or urban living. “Developers who have focused for the last decade on urban developments would be well served to diversify their offerings and cater to the growing number of people who are prioritising space over convenience or commuting time,” added Henry.

Graeme Walker, development finance head of lending at Hampshire Trust Bank, advised that potentially higher levels of unemployment following the end of the furlough scheme will have to be managed carefully. “Unemployment will impact some specific geographic locations and demographic groups more than others.”

Eli warned that as sites get finished and come to market towards the end of 2021 to early 2022, there could end up being an oversupply, forcing sales values down. “This could push developers into holding some of the units rather than selling,” he stipulated. “However, when coming to refinance, developers need to be aware that the valuations of GDV that they had been working from prior to Covid are likely to be significantly lower — meaning they may not be able to refinance at the same level they expect.”

Phil remarked that, while the housing sector has been supported throughout the pandemic, it cannot last forever. “In times of prosperity, it is likely to be one of the areas where the government will look to claw back some of the economic losses it has incurred, particularly over the past year. We are already seeing that with the end to the stamp duty reduction on the horizon, and it is likely that there may be a further increase in taxation in the medium- to long-term, and this could have a big effect on willingness to buy and sell. For the moment, however, riding through the Covid storm and making the most of current government support seems to be the main priority for developers.”

It is also important to note that developers are not immune to the return of the stamp duty land tax, which will be brought back in September. “Most experts believe stamp duty to be outdated, as it is levied on purchase rather than profit and is deemed to be one of the main deterrents for people looking to invest in property,” said Asim. Therefore, this could impact the exits of such developments.

Looking at the positives, Robert sees 2021 as more of an opportunity than a challenge. “All being well, the economy should emerge strongly as we rebuild following coronavirus, while some of the trends we have seen emerging over the past decade — such as the growth of online retailing — have been gathering speed. This creates opportunities across all sectors. An area that interests me is the revitalisation of town and city centres and the role property developers could have as we reimagine our towns with mixed living, retail and hospitality spaces. Shifts in how we work also open up new areas for developers outside of traditional commuter lines.”

 

Source: Development Finance Today

 

The programme – which could include home insulation and low/zero emission heating technologies – has been described as one of the most significant actions in the Glasgow region’s covid-19 recovery plan.

A “massive” energy retrofit programme could target over 420,000 homes across the Glasgow city region.

As part of recovery plans from the pandemic, a feasibility study will look at costs, benefits and potential barriers to the scheme.

The programme – which could include home insulation and low/zero emission heating technologies – has been described as one of the most significant actions in the region’s Covid-19 recovery plan.

Properties with the lowest energy efficiency ratings – in energy performance certificate bands D to G – will be the focus of the study.

Analysis of housing stock across the city region found over 428,000 homes need to improve their energy efficiency ratings to meet national policy targets, the city region cabinet was told.

Councillor Jonathan McColl, the leader of West Dunbartonshire Council, presenting an update to the Glasgow city region cabinet, said the programme was a “huge opportunity”.

It would support economic recovery from the pandemic, create skilled jobs, provide quality housing and reduce fuel poverty, he said.

He added: “The scale of the challenge in delivering a retrofit programme like this really is significant.

“The programme is a national as well as a regional priority, meaning there are lots of partners we’ll need to work with.”

Mr McColl said developing a “robust” study was the “first step” in the programme.

Partners include both the Scottish and UK Governments, Skills Development Scotland, the construction industry, social landlords and homeowners.

The £80,000 study will be funded by £65,000 from a Scottish Government recovery renewal fund and a £15,000 contribution from Skills Development Scotland.

Glasgow’s council leader Susan Aitken said: “This is potentially one of the single biggest things that we have to collectively do.

“Both as part of the Covid recovery but also to meet our carbon reduction and climate emergency targets.

“It is absolutely massive and the skills part of it is going to be absolutely crucial.

“We can’t deliver either on recovery or on decarbonisation unless we’ve got the skilled folk to do it.”

The feasibility study is expected to be completed by September.

Appropriate solutions – such as home insultation, clean energy and low/zero emissions heat technologies – will be considered during the study.

It will also look at potential barriers, such as mixed ownership in flats and ensuring uptake among private landlords and homeowners.

A funding model, any skill gaps and the current capacity of the supply chain will be assessed.

The potential scheme is expected to run over at least 10 years.

 

Source: Glasgow Live

 

UK construction activity boomed in March with the purchasing managers’ index reaching 61.7 – the highest reading since the second half of 2014.

This was a sharp rise on February’s 53.3 figure and significantly above the 50 no-change status with housebuilding the best performing category at 64 – the fastest growth since July 2020.

Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply group director Duncan Brock said: “This upturn led to a significant boost in hiring levels with the fastest upturn in job creation since December 2018 offering a clear sign that companies are feeling more positive in planning for new builds and refurbishments of current properties.”

Strong activity increases were also seen in commercial construction, 62.7, and civil engineering, 58, in March, the highest index readings since the second half of 2014.

Survey respondents commented on higher workloads due to greater spending on residential construction work and rising new home sales.

There were also reports of a boost from major infrastructure projects and mobilisation of delayed initiatives in hospitality, leisure, and office development.

Growth projections were the most upbeat since June 2015, reflecting confidence in the UK economic outlook, the improving pandemic situation and pent-up demand.

Hank Zarihs Associates said lenders had noticed that requests for development and refurbishment finance were buoyant.

Supply constraints point to higher material costs

But higher demand for construction products and materials has contributed to longer wait times. Around 41 per cent of the index survey panel reported longer delivery times from suppliers in March, while only one per cent saw an improvement. Supply constraints and logistics issues were commonly reported by construction companies, especially for imported items.

The Construction Leadership Council, CLC, is advising builders to plan ahead as shortages for products and materials are expected to intensify over the next two to three months.

“All users should plan for increased demand and longer delays, keep open lines of communication with their suppliers and order early for future projects,” said the CLC’s product availability working group.

It pointed out that not enough timber was being produced and that other countries such as America and China were paying more to secure supply. Plastics, cement and aggregates, steel, roof tiles, bricks and imported products such as screws, fixings, plumbing items and sanitaryware are all scarce.

The collapse of corporate giant Carillion in January 2018, highlights a culture of financial deviance embedded at the heart of the UK construction sector, according to research by London South Bank University (LSBU).

The research shows that, following the collapse of a major financial institution like Carillion, individuals and teams in the wider construction sector, often accommodate, explain away or normalize discrepancies and problems. These become part of a culture which unintentionally reduces awareness of the potential consequences of that deviant behaviour. Taken together, these factors can result in a company not following codes of practice while failing to anticipate and manage a wide range of potential reputational issues and structural internal crises.

By performing a qualitative analysis on the collapse of construction giant, Carillion, the researchers have exposed the most common deviant practices and sources of ‘normalization of deviance’ embedded in the sector. The findings suggest that ‘normalization of deviance’ lies not only internally, but also externally, in the wider industry environment in which construction organizations operate. The results sound an alarm bell and call for structural reform of the construction industry to prevent the negative effects of corporate deviance.

The research detected three distinct types of ‘normalization of deviance’ that existed within Carillion before the corporation’s collapse that could also be prevalent in the wider construction sector:

  • Late payment to suppliers;
  • Aggressive accounting;
  • Auditors failing to identify problems.

The researchers categorized these three types of ‘normalization of deviance’ as internal or external, depending on whether they related to the company under observation or its main stakeholders. They observed that, while in hindsight, these practices could be viewed as unacceptable, their emergence was a gradual process that took place over several years. This pattern of corporate behaviour indicates that ‘normalization of deviance’ is likely to be embedded in corporate culture and very difficult to detect in the initial stages of its development.

The researchers found that the business characteristics in the construction industry, with its highly competitive and pressurized culture, low profit margins, complex and uncertain undertakings, have all contributed to the emergence of questionable business practices.

The research project is led by Dr Sara Hajikazemi, Senior Lecturer in Project Management at LSBU’s Business School, in collaboration with co-authors from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology and Nord University in Norway, and the University of Oulu and Tampere University in Finland.

Dr Sara Hajikazemi, said, “Our research shows that ‘normalized deviance’ has always been present in the construction sector.

“What is concerning is that, as happened with Carillion, construction companies currently lack an early warning system that could alert them to emerging signs of deviant corporate behaviour and malpractice. This means that the construction industry is still likely to be at risk of falling prey to ‘normalized deviance’ and its damaging consequences in future.’’

The project — which comprises a mix of two- to five-bedroom houses and bungalows, situated in the Cumbrian village of Hackthorpe — is being delivered by regional housebuilder, Genesis Homes, in a joint venture with Housing Growth Partnership (HGP).

Genesis Homes approached UTB’s director of property development, Huw Jenkins, for the loan when its original lender withdrew an offer of funding at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.

The bank stepped in at short notice to finance the £6.7m development at 62% LTGDV on a 25-month loan term, as Genesis Homes was due to complete the site acquisition.

Nicky Gordon, managing director at Genesis Homes, said: “Having our original funding offer pulled as we were about to complete our purchase of the site was far from ideal.

“Fortunately, I was aware that UTB was continuing to lend, despite the added complications and uncertainty surrounding the Covid-19 pandemic.

“Huw quickly appraised our proposal, liaised with HGP and, very soon afterwards, confirmed that UTB would provide the funding we needed to acquire and develop the land.

“Huw’s experience and knowledge of the housebuilding process and the challenges faced by SME developers is second to none and I look forward to this and many more successful developments with UTB and HGP.”

Huw added: “Although Genesis Homes is a relatively young company, it’s evident from its success over the last few years that it’s a company with a great reputation and a bright future.

“At UTB, we’re keen to build strong relationships with quality housebuilders, supporting not just one scheme but several and helping them to achieve their long-term growth ambitions.

“2020 was a challenging year for most housebuilders and I’m delighted UTB was able to step in at short notice and enable Nicky and the Genesis Homes team to crack on with this excellent new development, delivering high quality homes to families in the North West.”

John Mckeon, investment director at HPG, commented: “Lenders’ mettle has been well and truly tested over the last year, and UTB have shown yet again that they’re a reliable and trusted funding partner.”

Genesis Homes, which was founded in 2017, expects to complete around 150 new homes in 2021.

Source: Development Finance Today

 

IHS Markit/CIPS UK Construction Total Activity Index registered 61.7 in March

Robust growth in all major categories of construction activity during March

Fastest rise in commercial work for six-and-a-half years

Job creation accelerates to 27-month high

 

The recovery in UK construction output gained considerable momentum in March, supported by robust rises in house building, commercial work and civil engineering.

Adjusted for seasonal influences, the IHS Markit/CIPS UK Construction Total Activity Index registered 61.7 in March, up sharply from 53.3 in February. The latest reading signalled the strongest rate of construction output growth since September 2014.

Housebuilding (index at 64.0) was the best-performing category, with growth the fastest since July 2020. Strong increases in activity were also seen in commercial construction (62.7) and civil engineering (58.0) in March, with the index readings for both segments the highest since the second half of 2014.

Survey respondents often commented on the mobilisation of delayed projects, especially in areas such as hospitality, leisure, and office development. There were again reports of a boost from major infrastructure projects in March, as well as higher workloads due to greater spending on residential construction work and rising new home sales.

Improving client demand and contract awards on projects that had been put on hold earlier in the pandemic contributed to a steep upturn in new orders during March. Moreover, the rate of expansion accelerated to its fastest since September 2014.

Forthcoming new project starts spurred a solid rise in employment numbers, with the rate of job creation the strongest for over two years in March. Construction companies also signalled a sharp increase in purchasing volumes in response to greater workloads. The latest upturn in input buying was the steepest since November 2020.

Higher demand for construction products and materials contributed to longer wait times for deliveries by suppliers. Around 41% of the survey panel reported longer delivery times from suppliers in March, while only 1% saw an improvement. Supply constraints and logistics issues were commonly reported by construction companies, especially for imported items.

Imbalanced demand and supply for construction inputs led to the steepest increase in purchasing prices since August 2008. Survey respondents widely noted that suppliers had cited Brexit and COVID-19 as reasons for price hikes in March.

Meanwhile, the latest survey indicated a strong degree of confidence towards the year ahead outlook for construction activity. Growth projections were the most upbeat since June 2015, reflecting confidence in the UK economic outlook, the improving pandemic situation and pent up demand.

 

COMMENT

Tim Moore, Economics Director at IHS Markit, which compiles the survey:“March data revealed a surge in UK construction output as the recovery broadened out from house building to commercial work and civil engineering. Total activity expanded to the greatest extent for six-and-a-half years as residential spending remained robust, commercial projects restarted and infrastructure contract awards moved ahead. “Improving confidence among clients in the commercial segment was a key driver of growth, with development activity rebounding in sectors of the economy set to benefit the most from the improving pandemic situation. The increasingly optimistic UK economic outlook has created a halo effect on construction demand and the perceived viability of new projects. “Constrained supplier capacity and stretched transport availability continued to pose challenges for the construction sector in March. Short supply of products and materials pushed up purchase prices at the fastest rate since August 2008. “Continued pressures on supply chains are expected in the near-term, but these concerns did little to dampen confidence about the business outlook. The latest survey pointed to the strongest growth projections across the UK construction sector since those reported during a post-election bounce back in June 2015.”Duncan Brock, Group Director at the Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply:“Construction was full of the joys of spring in March with a sudden leap into solid growth fuelled by across the board rises in workloads in all sectors. The commercial pipeline was particularly spectacular giving its best performance since late-2014.”This upturn led to a significant boost in hiring levels with the fastest upturn in job creation since December 2018 offering a clear sign that companies are feeling more positive in planning for new builds and refurbishments of current properties.”Business confidence was also standing tall with future optimism about the next 12 months the highest since June 2015 which suggests it is mostly plain sailing now that lockdowns are ending and vaccine programmes are underway. The unfortunate spanner in the works comes in the form of the steepest inflationary rise in raw materials and other construction items since August 2008 at the height of the last commodity price cycle. Supply chains are still underperforming and almost half of the survey respondents said they had experienced longer delays and higher costs. If this continues, it could easily cool the sector down a notch.”

 

 

Amid increasing difficulty in finding insurance coverage for the architecture and construction sectors, architects accounted for more than a third of all professional indemnity claims submitted last year, a recent report from PolicyBee has revealed.

Despite making up of just 6% of all policies and 10% of the total value, architects made 38% of all PI claims in 2020, according to the Suffolk-based insurance broker’s latest claims report.

Ongoing issues in the construction industry – including several failed basement conversions and concerns about building cladding brought about by the Grenfell Tower disaster – led many insurers to deem the sector high-risk.

The situation has made it challenging for architects to find adequate PI cover as some insurance providers have raised premiums and excesses by up to 400%, introduced major exclusions within their policies, or pulled out of offering cover altogether.

The report said that if companies were able to get cover, it was “not always fit for purpose,” adding that the average capacity per underwriter has dropped by half in the last 18 months from £5 million to £2.5 million.

“Unfortunately, we expect challenges surrounding PI insurance to remain for a few years yet,” said Yasin Akdemir, architects’ insurance specialist at PolicyBee. “As well as rising premiums, policy renewals are another area of concern for architects as some insurers are ceasing to provide cover for the industry. Others are asking for far more information from customers than they used to, which of course takes time and can cause a bit of a paperwork headache for architects.”

In a statement, PolicyBee said that one way to address the problem is to use a specialist insurance broker.

“They have the advantage of being able to use their market knowledge to approach different insurers to find the most suitable policy at the best price,” the insurer said. “Brokers can save customers time and stress by doing the legwork and – crucially – checking policy wordings to ensure the necessary level of cover is provided.”

“Historically, architects have been responsible for putting in high numbers of PI claims at PolicyBee,” Akdemir said. “These often stem from common issues such as communication breakdowns between architects and their clients or builders failing to report or correct design problems. There is no doubt all businesses in the industry need the best level of protection from PI claims and their associated legal fees and compensation claims.”

With PI claims remaining high for architects, PolicyBee also urged those renewing their policies or looking for new ones to check the level of cover provided carefully, and well in advance of the date required.

CHAS Managing Directr Ian McKinnon

The rollout of a new data-sharing agreement between the Common Assessment Standard providers means the benefits of qualifying for and specifying the scheme are greater than ever. CHAS, Managing Director Ian McKinnon explains more.

 

What is the Common Assessment Standard?

Since its launch in 2019, the Common Assessment Standard has fast become the construction industry’s gold standard for prequalification.

Led by Build UK, with the support of CECA, the scheme has been designed to replace multiple assessment schemes with one comprehensive industry-agreed questionnaire, based on existing prequalification questionnaires, including PAS 91.

Previously the PQ system was complex and repetitive, with an estimated 180,000 specialist contractors required to produce over two million pieces of paper every year for 5,000 contractors at a cost of up to £1 billion.

The Common Assessment Standard cuts through this inefficiency while helping the industry manage risk across a wider range of criteria such as sustainability, modern slavery and financial performance.

 

Who specifies the Common Assessment Standard?

As the Common Assessment standard is resetting a long-established system, a phased approach is being taken to its rollout. This allows companies to adopt the Common Assessment Standard at a time that suits them; however, it has already gained strong support from both the public and private sectors. The Crown Commercial Service (CCS) requires that contractors appointed to its seven-year framework assess their supply chains using the Common Assessment Standard, and it is expected to feature in the details of the Government’s new Construction Playbook. The Construction Leadership Council (CLC) also supports the scheme.

Many major contractors have also moved swiftly to specifying the new standard, with this figure expected to rise now that the data-sharing agreement is in place.

 

What’s the relevance of the data-sharing agreement?

CHAS was the first accreditation body to offer the Common Assessment Standard in 2019 via the CHAS Premier package. Although contractors could now take the assessment with other approved assessment bodies, the data-sharing agreement means the details of everyone who passes the assessment can be accessed via any of the providers, regardless of which assessment body carries out the audit. For CHAS contractors, this means they only need to complete the Common Assessment Standard once a year with CHAS to qualify for a wide range of work rather than having to sign up to multiple schemes – saving time and money.

Meanwhile, clients looking for pre-qualified contractors simply specify the Common Assessment Standard to find contractors accredited to a single, consistent industry-agreed standard. Clients can access a database of these contractors via the services of any of the assessment bodies – such as the free CHAS Client Portal.

 

Why choose CHAS?

As well as being the founder of third party accreditation and a trusted authority on supply chain risk management, CHAS is renowned for providing a friendly and efficient service and high customer satisfaction levels.

CHAS contractors receive additional benefits such as access to e-learning resources, discounted fuel and shopping schemes and business insurance. CHAS is also committed to helping contractors who are not yet ready to complete the Common Assessment Standard to work towards higher levels of accreditation.

Meanwhile, it is free, quick and easy for clients to sign up to the CHAS Client Portal where they will also find a suite of complimentary supply chain management and procurement tools.

 

How can you find out more?

To find out more about qualifying for, or specifying, the Common Assessment Standard, visit www.chas.co.uk or call 0345 521 9111