Small building companies are reporting falling workloads, material costs going up, and a shortage of available workers, according to the latest State of Trade Survey Q3 2024, from the Federation of Master Builders (FMB).

Brian Berry, Chief Executive of the FMB commented: “The FMB’s latest State of Trade Survey for Q3 20024 reveals a challenging economic climate for small building companies across the UK with 32% of FMB members reporting falling workloads over the past quarter. Enquiries are also down, as is employment, with over a third of members struggling to recruit bricklayers and carpenters. What is concerning is that the poor numbers reported by builders seem to be here to stay as they have been a constant throughout 2024. The last time such a negative trend was reported was in the years following the financial crisis of 2008.”

Berry concluded: “The Government missed a key opportunity in the October Budget to announce serious funding to tackle the skills crisis in Britain while tax rises, such as the increase to employers’ National Insurance contributions, creates additional barriers with firms already struggling to recruit staff. The Government needs to prioritise boosting construction skills if it is serious about having a high-quality construction industry capable of delivering the ambitious housebuilding targets it has set out.”

The FMB State of Trade Survey for Q3 2024 found:

Market conditions

  • Workloads are down 7% on the previous quarter.
    • 32% of members reported a decline in workloads, with 41% seeing no change.
  • Enquiries are down 3% on Q2 of 2024
  • Employment over Q3 of 2024 has declined once again, seeing a 4% on the second quarter.
    • The most common type of work for an FMB member were renovations and major works

Skills

  • 23% of members reported a decrease in the number of employees, which is similar to Q2 (24%) but lower than Q1 2024 (28%)
  • 35% of members are struggling to hire carpenters, down from 41% in Q2 2024
  • 28% are struggling to hire bricklayers, down slightly from 29% in the previous quarter.
  • Difficulties in recruiting general labourers have substantially increased according to 34% of members, up from 26% in Q2 2024. Challenges hiring roofers have increased from 13% to 16%, and painters and decorators from 11% to 13%
  • 38% of members have reported shortage of skilled tradespeople has resulted in job delays.

Changes in prices and costs

  • Approximately 65% of members indicated that rising costs led to higher prices for their services, a slight decrease from 67% in Q2 2024
  • 54% of members who experienced rising costs reported lower-than-expected business profits or financial losses, a slight increase from 52% in the previous quarter.
  • 26% of respondents said that cost pressures have caused them to restrict their recruitment plans, a slight increase from 22% in Q2 2024. Around 10% revealed that their business viability was compromised, putting them at risk of closure.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FULL REPORT

The construction industry is raising concerns about a government’s plan to replace zero-hours contracts with guaranteed hours. Under the proposed Employment Rights Bill, employers would need to offer guaranteed-hour contracts to zero-hours workers after a typical 12-week period. Industry leaders are warning this could drive up costs in a sector reliant on flexible labour for project demands and seasonal peaks. We’ll hear from a sector expert advising employers on this issue.

It was in September when, as Sky News reported at the time, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds informed business leaders and unions in a private meeting that new legislation could oblige employers to offer zero-hours staff a regular contract with guaranteed hours after 12 weeks. That change has been confirmed with its appearance in the Employment Rights Bill.

Business groups, including the CBI who were at the meeting, have also expressed concerns about the potential impact of the changes on sectors like construction which rely heavily on flexible staffing. They point out that limiting zero-hours contracts could impact job growth, investment, and productivity if not carefully managed and they advocate a more balanced approach that considers the nuanced needs of both workers and businesses. They warn the government to weigh carefully the ‘unintended consequences’ on business operations and the potential for increased costs. In particular, they highlight the potential for an increased administrative burden as firms adjust their staffing models and manage compensation for cancelled or rescheduled shifts. The say ‘firms will face a significant challenge in balancing the industry’s inherent need for agility to manage variable project demands and client needs.’

So how big a deal is this for the sector? Earlier I spoke to Stuart Neilson who joined me by video-link from Glasgow:

Stuart Neilson:

“I think it is a big issue. I think the problem from what I’ve seen of the legislation at the moment, and remember we’ve got the primary legislation and then there is a lot of the detail that’s going to follow in regulations which we don’t have yet so we don’t quite know the full picture, but what we do know at the moment is that, in essence, what the government are proposing is a system whereby those who are what we currently call ‘zero hours employees’, and also employees who might be on low hours – again we don’t know what they mean by that but it could be people who are maybe on under 10 hours a week, 12 hours a week, we just don’t know. If you’re a zero hours employee, or a low hours employee, there will be an ability, or a requirement on the employer, to offer you, effectively, a guaranteed number of hours after a 12-week period. Again, we think it’s 12 weeks, it could be a different reference period based on the number of hours you’ve actually worked in that period. So what you effectively build in is you build a ratchet in whereby people will get some guaranteed level of hours, but it only goes up and it only goes in one direction. So I think our concern is where’s the flexibility in the ability to ramp down in that type of situation. Again, we don’t know the full details, we don’t know if there will be some mechanism whereby there might be some flexibility built in. I think there’s some talk of flexibility in relation to seasonal workers, but I’m not sure that within the infrastructure sector you would really have people who would qualify as seasonal workers. I think that’s more aimed at things like farming, for example, or the tourist or hospitality sector. So it is a problem. I think one potential solution might be that there will be a greater use of agency workers going forwards. Again, the government have suggested they’re going to be looking at whether they regulate agency workers in a similar way. I personally think that’s going to be quite a difficult thing for them to achieve, so whether they actually do that or not I don’t know, but I think that this certainly poses a particular challenge for the infrastructure sector, as you say, in the ability to not just ramp up, but ramp down.”

As it’s one of the biggest changes in the Employment Rights Bill for construction, Stuart and his team are already advising clients on coping strategies, such as reviewing staffing models, adjusting project planning, and potentially increasing agency worker use. If you need support, contact Stuart – his details are on screen – or reach out to your usual Pinsent Masons adviser.

 

Source: Pinsent Masons

Following today’s announcement that the Bank of England (BofE) has reduced the base interest rate from 5% to 4.75%, David Hannah, Group Chairman of Cornerstone Tax, argues that this move is crucial to mitigate the effects of recent measures introduced on the UK property market as part of the government’s Autumn Budget. Rachel Reeves’s announcement of a 2% surcharge increase on second homes, along with reduced stamp duty thresholds for first-time buyers to be introduced next year, has come at a significant cost to the property market. These changes are placing heavy financial burdens on first-time buyers, increasing mortgage rates whilst contributing to a long-anticipated collapse in the supply of private rental properties, driving an unprecedented surge in rental costs.

David Hannah, Group Chairman of Cornerstone Tax, comments:

“The decision from the government to lower stamp duty bands shows a concerning deficit of joined-up thinking. Does this Chancellor and Prime Minister not understand that if they want 1.5 million new homes, they cannot drive landlords out of the market, incur additional charges for first-time buyers and freeze up working capital for developers – which can only be available if these homes are selling. I expect stamp duty receipts to fall significantly, then to flatline in Q1 2025, potentially plunging the British property market into a desperate situation. In essence, reducing stamp duty thresholds means that it will ultimately be the consumers who foot the bill.

“Furthermore, it would make sense for the new Government to suspend, or even abolish, the 3% surcharge where properties are being acquired for private rental sector investment. Removing this measure would encourage landlords to increase their holdings, rather than exit the market – reversing the decline in supply of rental homes and potentially expand it to the point where demand no longer outstrips supply.” 
 
Whilst the decision from the BoE should come as welcome news to those with their eyes on Britain’s property market, Hannah holds that more can still be done to stimulate the sector – urging the monetary policy committee to aim for a 3-3.5% base rate in order to stimulate private development, incentivise first-time buyers and restart the private rental sector.

Credit: iCube Programme

Work has commenced at 2 pilot sites in Barcelona and Brussels as part of the European project RECONSTRUCT. The two resulting buildings will challenge conventional construction by integrating circularity throughout their lifecycle phases: design, material selection, assembly, and deconstruction.

The European co-funded Horizon project RECONSTRUCT will see the construction of two demonstration buildings in Barcelona and Brussels. The demos will highlight the real-world impact and economic viability of the project’s innovative construction approaches; they will implement a full cycle of construction, transformation and deconstruction, while reusing or recycling excess components.

The Barcelona demo: an alternative model for concrete in collective housing

In Barcelona, a 41 m2 one-story modular building will be installed outside Santa Perpètua de Mogoda Castle, on the outskirts of the city. Envisioned as a model for collective housing, this demo will demonstrate alternative solutions for cast-in-place concrete construction. As part of the experiment, the building will be deconstructed in early 2027, hosting group visits and open labs throughout its lifespan.

Both the building’s rectangular foundation slab and vertical structure will be made of an on-site mix of Alkali Activated Cement-Based Concrete (AACC) and recycled aggregates. Façades will feature easy-to-disassemble precast AACC concrete panels reinforced with biobased composite bars (rather than steel), and the exterior will have dry laid paving stones, made of AACC and over 90% recycled aggregates. The in-situ components will be recycled in local industries, while the industrialised elements will be reused in other constructions.

When designing a building, we must start considering its whole life cycle from the very beginning, from maintenance techniques to unexpected environmental costs. Only in this way will we be able to deconstruct it, and to reuse or recycle its materials, thereby fostering the decarbonisation and circularity of the whole construction sector”

explains Laura Reus, Senior Environmental Consultant at Societat Orgànica, the sustainable building consultancy responsible for pilot design.

The Brussels demo: from demolition and recycling to prefabrication and reuse.

The Brussels demo, a two-storey 60 m2 building, will be located on the innovation campus of Green Energy Park in Zellik, a key meeting point for researchers and industry professionals. This will help combine energy-saving strategies and circular economy solutions.

The building will feature a bioclimatic design to reduce energy use, employ fossil-free building services, and use prefabricated elements made from low-carbon AAC concrete, easy to adapt and reuse elsewhere. In the first phase of construction, manufacturer Holland Composites will provide prefabricated elements with a recycled PET foam core and a bio-resin shell to construct the building envelope. For the second phase, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) will develop an alkali-activated concrete panel with textile-reinforced concrete shells to replace the storey floor. No waste will be created during the replacement.

In construction, concrete is a material with countless applications. However, it comes at a high environmental cost. As we move towards a circular construction sector, we will have to carefully consider how we build with this material. From now on, building with concrete should be as precious as building with gold”

remarks Jeroen Poppe, Project Researcher at VUB Architectural Engineering.

RECONSTRUCT is an EU co-funded Horizon project running from June 2023 to May 2027. It involves 14 partners from 5 EU countries and the UK. RECONSTRUCT demo buildings aim to employ 50% virgin content; 80% reusable/recyclable content; nearly 100% locally available content; 0% construction and demolition waste to landfill, and a better material-to-surface ratio than conventional buildings.

 

Source: Sciencex

St Margaret’s Church of England Academy in Aigburth(Image: Google Street View)

 

Almost £4m is to be pumped into a Liverpool school to help ease the pressure on the city’s educational place challenges. In response to an increasing need for school places, Liverpool Council funds the construction and refurbishment of school buildings using the Basic Need capital grant provided by the Department for Education (DfE). With work already done to provide needed spaces at a city girls school, finances are being made available to create 30 new places for boys in Aigburth.

The local authority’s cabinet is poised to sign off on £3.9m to be drawn down from the capital grant to All Saints Multi-Academy Trust to fund construction and refurbishment of school buildings at St Margaret’s Church of England Academy.

All Saints Multi-Academy Trust were approached to increase their Planned Admission Number – the amount of pupils per year group – from 160 to 180 for September 2024, increasing to 190 from September 2025 onwards. The school met the DfE requirements for the creation of additional places based on the planning area it serves, physical capacity to extend and is well placed in terms of governance and performance.

A report issued to cabinet members ahead of their meeting next week set out how pupil place planning considers the predicted long-term needs for new school places arising from population growth. As a commissioner of school places, Liverpool Council undertakes an annual audit of school capacity and uses data to allow accurate and robust forecasting for school places at both primary and secondary level, including data on school capacity, live birth data, pupil numbers, housing development yields and in-year transfers to project the number of school places which will be needed.

The council then works to provide additional places through the expansion of existing schools. For a number of years, the city has faced a challenging time in providing sufficient secondary school places, particularly in good or outstanding schools.

Using planning area forecasts, significant work has already been undertaken to create places within existing provision in areas of demand. This has included the creation of 70 new places in all girls’ schools.

In order to secure a balance of provision by providing additional boys places within this planning area, discussions have taken place with St Margarets Church of England Academy to permanently increase their planned admission number by 20 places per year group from 2024, increasing to 30 from September 2025. The cash boost is expected to be approved when cabinet meets on Tuesday November 12.

 

Source: Liverpool Echo

Leeds-based offsite construction manufacturer Remagin, part of Etex Group, is playing a pivotal role in the development of a new affordable retirement community in Oldham, Greater Manchester.

Using Remagin’s innovative Light Gauge Steel Frame (LGSF) Modern Methods of Construction (MMC) technology, Sydney Grange is being developed by McCarthy Stone and will deliver 51 affordable homes for older people in the region.

All the panels for the Sydney Grange development were manufactured at Remagin’s factory in Leeds and assembled on-site, supporting local employment and helping to speed up the construction process and reduce costs. The project is the first of its kind to use Remagin’s MMC solutions in full alongside the Older Persons Shared Ownership (OPSO) scheme, with apartments available for just £95,000 based on 50% ownership*.

Shahi Islam, Director of Affordable Housing at Homes England, recently visited the retirement community which will open later this year as well as Remagin’s factory in Leeds. He said

“McCarthy Stone’s Failsworth development is an excellent example of high-quality and affordable housing for older people. We are pleased to support it through our older persons shared ownership scheme which forms a key part of Homes England’s efforts to provide suitable housing and build strong communities.

“Expanding the use of MMC is also a priority for the programme so it’s great to see the success of the partnership with Remagin. We look forward to supporting this model and seeing it progress.”

Remagin’s involvement highlights the importance of local manufacturing in the delivery of large-scale affordable housing projects. By producing LGSF panels locally, the company has been able to support the Yorkshire economy while ensuring high-quality construction at reduced costs.

Patrick Balemans, Head of Division at Etex New Ways and Remagin, said:

“This project demonstrates how Modern Methods of Construction can be used to meet the increasing demand for affordable, energy efficient and high-quality housing. By manufacturing the panels at our Leeds facility, we’ve not only reduced build times but also contributed to the local economy and created jobs in the regional supply chain. We look forward to continuing our work on similar projects that combine speed, value and cost-efficiency.”

(L-R) Martin Brown, MD Special Projects, McCarthy Stone; Declan Fishwick, Business Development Manager, McCarthy Stone; Ruth Ryan, Assistant Director, Affordable Homes Programme, Homes England; Shahi Islam, Director, Affordable Homes Programme, Homes England; Rowena Clements, Associate Director, OPSO Programme, McCarthy Stone; John Tonkiss, CEO, McCarthy Stone

 

Sydney Grange is the first in a series of projects that McCarthy Stone and Remagin plan to deliver across the Midlands and the North, with a focus on addressing the growing need for affordable homes for older people. The use of MMC is expected to reduce construction timelines by up to 50%, while also offering sustainable, energy-efficient homes that lower ongoing costs for residents.

 

Source: Yorkshire Times

BriggsAmasco has triumphed at this year’s NFRC Scottish Roofing Contractor of the Year Awards. Its teams’ outstanding delivery of a challenging waterproofing programme as part of the Central Quay residential development in Glasgow earned victory in the ‘Multi-Discipline Project over £250,000’ category.

BriggsAmasco’s success was announced at an NFRC finalists’ event held at The Grand Central Hotel, Glasgow awards on Friday 25th October. A record 270 contractors, suppliers and merchants from across the Scottish region attended the event, which was hosted by TV and radio personality Tam Cowan.

Tony Lawther, Managing Director at BriggsAmasco said:

“What a fantastic achievement. The NFRC Scottish Roofing Contractor of the Year Awards are incredibly well-regarded throughout the industry. To come out on top in a hotly contested roofing category is a real badge of honour for our waterproofing teams and the company as a whole.” 

The Central Quay programme comprised 35 roof areas across four steepling tower blocks totalling 3,323m2. The huge area was waterproofed by BriggsAmasco using the skillset of five different flat roofing activities: Bauder Bakor Hotmelt; Bauder Thermofol single-ply; Bauder Liquide, Bauder BTRS built-up felt roofing, and IKO Permascreed mastic asphalt levelling screed. It also included paving slab and ballast roof landscaping finishes, as well as a large podium deck 1870m2 over an underground car park.

Delivered to the highest standard with a zero-defect sign-off, the Central Quay project further showcased BriggsAmasco teams’ ability to overcome waterproof detail challenges and deliver a range of perfectly executed solutions using mastic asphalt.

Tony Lawther continued:

“I can’t speak highly enough of the incredible work carried out at Central Quay, one of the city’s newest and largest housing developments. Congratulations to all BriggsAmasco teams involved in the project.”

 

With Spain tackling its worst flooding disaster in modern history, several countries across Europe will be wondering – could we be next?

Scientists have long warned that climate change means extreme weather will become increasingly frequent and urged nations to be prepared.

So, how would London – home to almost nine million people and the economic centre of the UK – cope if a year’s worth of rain fell in a few hours, as it did in Valencia?

Although it’s difficult to know exactly how it would be impacted, experts have previously said the capital is far from ready for that kind of deluge and could suffer catastrophic consequences.

In January, for example, an independent climate research study, commissioned by London Mayor Sadiq Khan, deemed London seriously underprepared for severe flooding, as well as extreme heat.

The London Climate Resilience Review found a lack of planning will create a ‘lethal risk’ to the most vulnerable communities, the BBC reported.

And in 2021, the non-profit organisation Climate Central shared a worrying map showing which areas of London are particularly vulnerable to flooding and could be regularly underwater by 2030.

Areas of London expected to be regularly flooded by 2030 (Picture: Climate Central/Getty). Inset Valencia after the storm

The map allows users to explore coastal flood risk and sea level rise projections by decade for anywhere in the world.

Red is used to show areas that will likely be below water level by 2030 and don’t appear to be protected by dikes.

For Londoners, the picture looks bleak.

In West London, most of east Twickenham, Chiswick, Hammersmith and Fulham are covered in red by 2030 – as well asmuch of Kew’s Royal Botanic Gardens.

Almost all of East London could also find itself prone to flooding and sea-level rises, including Greenwich, Stratford, Rotherithe and East Ham.

Like the east and west, a lot of the land south of the river is low and flat.

Battersea, Deptford, Southwark, Camberwell and Peckham will all be vulnerable to flooding by 2030.

Areas in red in north London include Hackney Marshes and Walthamstow reservoirs around the River Lee.

The data is based on a scenario of moderate cuts to pollution, with even more areas covered in red if pollution goes unchecked.

The London Climate Resilience Review report said the capital’s main climate risks were rising sea levels, surface water flooding, heat, drought and wildfires.

Review chairwoman Emma Howard Boyd said at the time:

‘London has many good plans and programmes to prepare for climate hazards but we need to recognise that Londoners now face lethal risks, and a step change is needed.

‘Last year was the hottest on record and this is causing chaos and disruption all over the world.

‘London is not immune, as shown by the flash floods in 2021 and a 40C heatwave in 2022.

‘It’s time for the UK, led by its cities and regions, to take action and prioritise adaptation.’

In response Mr Khan said his latest budget proposed an additional £3m to ‘accelerate climate adaptation work’.

 

Source: Metro News

Steel and concrete production collectively contribute to a staggering 15 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions, a figure considered alarmingly high due to the sheer scale and ubiquity of these materials in modern construction.

The construction industry’s significant environmental impact has spurred a shift towards low-carbon alternatives, driven by increasing awareness of climate change and stricter environmental regulations.

However, these eco-friendly options come with higher production costs, primarily due to the need for specialised equipment, alternative raw materials, and innovative technologies such as carbon capture and storage.

Renewable energy plays a crucial role in producing green steel and concrete, but it often comes with higher initial costs. For instance, green steel produced using hydrogen-based direct reduced iron and electric arc furnaces (H2-DRI-EAF) can incur a ‘green premium’ of around US$225 per tonne when hydrogen is priced at US$5/kg.

Similarly, low-carbon cement using carbon capture and storage technology can be 75 per cent more expensive than conventional cement. However, it’s important to note that these increased material costs typically result in only modest price increases for end products, with estimates suggesting just a 1 per cent increase in the total cost of a house or car.

Despite the increased expenses, major consumers in the construction sector, including real estate developers, builders, architects, and other stakeholders, are increasingly willing to pay a premium for sustainable steel and concrete.

This stems from a combination of factors, including corporate social responsibility commitments, regulatory compliance, and the growing demand from environmentally conscious end-users who prioritise sustainable buildings and infrastructure.

A major report released at Climate Week NYC by Climate Group and Ramboll reveals a significant shift in the global business landscape towards sustainable construction materials. The study, which surveyed over 250 companies across 42 countries and 21 industries, found that nearly half of the respondents are willing to pay a premium for lower-emission steel and concrete. This ultimately signals a robust demand for sustainable options in these carbon-intensive industries.

The report also highlights that 78 per cent of surveyed companies anticipate these sustainable materials will become standard within the next decade, indicating a growing recognition of the importance of reducing carbon emissions in construction.

Despite the positive outlook, several barriers to widespread adoption remain — including cost, industry conservatism, and lack of knowledge. To accelerate the transition, businesses are calling for decisive government intervention through financial incentives, carbon pricing mechanisms, and minimum product standards.

Ramboll Director for Energy-Intensive Industries Anna Ekdahl noted that lowering steel- and concrete-related emissions requires more than massive investments in new production facilities alone, instead, it will require a realignment of the entire sustainable energy ecosystem.

“Grid owners will have to take on a more active role than ever before — government will have to shape financial incentives, designers will have to come up with new solutions, producers will have to make bold business decisions, and end users may need to accept a price premium until the market matures,” said Ekdahl.

Not making this transition to low-carbon steel and concrete poses significant environmental risks. Continued reliance on traditional production methods for these materials heavily contributes to global greenhouse gas emissions, exacerbating climate change and its associated impacts.

This inaction perpetuates the cycle of environmental degradation, including rising sea levels, more frequent extreme weather events, and biodiversity loss.

Conversely, embracing low-carbon alternatives offers substantial environmental benefits. By adopting innovative technologies and processes, companies can dramatically reduce their carbon footprint, potentially cutting emissions by up to 70 per cent in cement production alone. This shift not only mitigates climate change but also promotes resource efficiency, reduces air and water pollution, and preserves natural habitats. Moreover, the switch to low-carbon materials can promote broader industry changes, inspiring further innovations and setting new standards for sustainable construction practices.

Ultimately, the move to low-carbon steel and concrete represents a crucial step towards a more sustainable and resilient future, aligning industrial practices with global environmental goals — like the Paris Agreement.

Companies in the building sector that fail to embrace green steel or concrete risk significant competitive disadvantages in an increasingly environmentally conscious market. As sustainability becomes a key driver of consumer and investor decisions, firms that lag behind in adopting eco- friendly materials may find themselves excluded from lucrative projects and partnerships.

Government regulations and building standards are evolving to prioritise low-carbon construction, potentially leaving non-compliant companies ineligible for contracts. Furthermore, institutional investors are increasingly focusing on reducing emissions in their portfolios, which could impact funding opportunities for companies resistant to change.

The growing prevalence of green steel offtake agreements, particularly in Europe, demonstrates a shift in market dynamics that forward-thinking companies are capitalising on.

As the demand for sustainable building materials rises, those who fail to adapt may face higher costs due to carbon pricing mechanisms like the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, further eroding their market position.

Ultimately, the transition to green steel and concrete represents not just an environmental imperative, but a critical business opportunity that companies cannot afford to ignore.

The transition to low-carbon steel and concrete is a critical step in the construction industry’s efforts against climate change, driven by increasing regulatory pressures and consumer demand for sustainable materials.

Companies that embrace this shift will not only contribute to significant emissions reductions but also gain competitive advantages in an increasingly sustainability-focused market.

 

Source: Build Australia

Construction giant ISG collapsed with debts over a billion pounds, newly published filings have shown, prompting fresh calls for audit reform.

ISG, which specialised in delivering government contracts projects like London’s velodrome, went bust in September after attempts to secure a rescue deal failed.

The demise of ISG was the largest and most significant collapse in the sector since the failure of Carillion, which went under in 2018 with arrears totalling £7bn.

Now, estimates made by company directors filed on Companies House show that ISG collapsed under debts of £981m. It also hadn’t fulfilled public sector contracts to build schools and prisons that were worth north of £1bn.

The revelations have given rise to fresh calls for reforms to be made to the UK’s accounting sector, after ISG was found not to have an internal auditing function in line with the Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors’ (CIIA) standards.

The CIIA has written to chair of the business select committee Liam Byrne and business secretary Jonathan Reynolds outlining its concerns about the structure and governance of ISG’s auditing process.

Labour MP Byrne told The Sunday Times that ISG’s collapse provided

“fresh evidence for why urgent reform of the British audit industry is now so essential”.

“Our committee will want to make sure the new Audit Reform and Corporate Governance Bill is fit for purpose, and that means learning the lessons from the shambles of ISG’s demise,” he added.

ISG was audited externally by MHA, and EY was appointed as its administrator.

EY was contacted for comment.

 

Source: CityAM