IWS Group, The Industrial Workspace Specialists, has acquired The Rack Group, a leading provider of pallet racking safety, inspection, repair and maintenance solutions.

The move will see The Rack Group become part of a growing family of specialist, market-leading businesses that currently includes impact protection solutions provider, Brandsafe, and visual communication solutions supplier, Beaverswood.

IWS Group provides essential services and supplies to the logistics, warehousing and material handling sectors in the UK, across Europe and beyond. The acquisition will further strengthen its position in core markets, extend the scope of the existing offering and open up opportunities to provide customers with additional product solutions and services.

Established for over 40 years and based in Barnsley, The Rack Group supplies its innovative racking protection products, such as Rack Armour, and its racking inspection, repair and maintenance services to some of the largest brands in retail, warehousing, logistics and material handling.

Management of both businesses believe that there is a uniquely complementary fit between the companies in terms of product ranges, services, people and expertise. Under the terms of the deal, The Rack Group will continue to trade as usual under its existing brand.

Jeroen van den Berge, CEO of IWS Group, said: “We are excited to welcome The Rack Group to the IWS family. We have known The Rack Group for some time and, as a business that has built a market-leading reputation for quality and expertise in racking safety, with a long-standing, multi-site customer base, it represents a strong and natural strategic fit for IWS Group.

“The warehousing, logistics and materials handling sectors have seen unprecedented growth due to new shopping behaviours and IWS Group is bringing together businesses built on specialist expertise and customer centricity to serve these sectors with essential products and services.

“The addition of The Rack Group provides further opportunity to broaden the scope of services and solutions each of the IWS Group companies can offer their customers. We look forward to a bright, prosperous and successful future together.”

Jenny Charlton, director at The Rack Group, said: “This is an extremely positive development for both organisations, bringing new opportunities to add greater value to customers in terms of product solutions, technical capabilities and enhanced customer service.

“Our market presence will remain as strong as it has always been. Indeed, an attraction of linking up with IWS Group means that we can benefit from the additional resources, infrastructure, and product offering that it brings, without loss of brand identity or the core values that have contributed to our success over four decades.”

 

iws.group

By Ellen Huelin, Associate Director at Whitecode

 

Creating more thermally efficient building envelopes is key to achieving energy efficiency and better performing buildings. Thermal bridging is a key focus point of the update to Part L of the Building Regulations; itself a stepping stone to the Future Homes Standard which aims to have new homes zero carbon ready by 2025. But with the amendments to Part L and the revision of SAP10 bringing thermal bridging into the limelight, what changes do we have to make as an industry?

Even though thermal bridging is far from a new concept, the update to Part L – in which thermal bridging features prominently – will certainly change things for construction clients. Here at Whitecode we have been assessing thermal bridging separately as part of an SAP assessment for many years, working to SAP 2012 which is recognised as the government standard for measuring a dwelling’s energy rating.

 There are a variety of ways to understand thermal bridging, but it can be basically summarised as the heat loss that occurs when two elements join. Thermal bridging happens when a wall meets a window, where there is a break in the insulation that consequently causes a cold bridge, resulting in higher heat loss. When completing a SAP assessment, we account for all those little bridges that feature in a house’s structural layers. To measure the rate of heat loss we calculate a Psi value. These are then added up to create the Ψ value for the entire dwelling. Considering thermal bridges account for around 30% of heat loss in a building, it’s vitally important to cover this area as it significantly impacts a SAP assessment.

A key change to the new Part L when it comes into force later on this year is the absence of accredited construction details (ACD) in the calculation of Psi values. Developed in 2002 by BRE, ACDs are a set of standardised junction details that are designed to prevent thermal bridging points in compliance with Part L. ACDs were used by many of us when completing a SAP assessment.

This major revision of SAP10 – the methodology which is part of Part L – is being made as ACDs are now considered an outdated, unreliable mode. Completing ACDs was almost a tick box exercise in the SAP assessment, where nobody actually looked at the finer detail. Furthermore, as ACDs were developed nearly 20 years ago this methodology doesn’t account for all the modern methods of construction, not to mention the big changes that were made post-Grenfell. Some of the new methods of insulation can exacerbate thermal bridging including the use of metal framing. These new technologies are not listed in the ACD and don’t always perform well compared to more solid pieces of insulation.

What are the alternatives?

With the absence of ACDs, a potential option is for manufacturers to create their own methodology to calculate Psi values. Many manufacturers have done so already, mostly because the incentive is there for them to create products that have good thermal bridging.

The caveat here however, is that there is little in the way of responsibility when it comes to ensuring these Psi values are delivered onsite. How do we know the SAP deliverables are actually achieved in real life? At the moment, no party is tasked with the duty of checking continuity of insulation onsite, which is worsening the performance gap. We need more than simple sign-off sheets.

Things are changing with the advent of technology. The industry is moving towards developing another stage in calculating Psi values, where someone will request photo evidence throughout the build which shows the insulation has been installed properly. The key thing here however, is that the responsibility needs to be defined. Is it the role of the SAP assessor or site manager to take photos? To assure quality, there needs to be verification so that appropriate images are uploaded. It may be that this becomes a digitised process with a clear audit trail, where documentation can be uploaded to the cloud securely and shared easily.

A camera could be mounted onto a hard hat to capture the work in real time. One of the credits in BREEAM is doing a thermographic survey on completion, where a thermal imaging camera is used to locate cold spots. Maybe we can develop this technology to quantify and measure process and quality onsite?

Whitecode uses thermal modelling software to complete bespoke Psi values. This is particularly suited to the current construction method using Metsec frame which bridges the insulation layer.

At Whitecode, we would encourage developers to start building up a portfolio of Psi values for their projects in anticipation of Part L 2021. It comes into force in June 2022, meaning the time to get prepared is now. These can be used across different sites and provides the opportunity to improve on these junctions where required.

Thermal bridging is a real hotspot in the construction industry right now. For many years it is been an afterthought or part of a tick-box exercise when it really should have ranked higher on the agenda. But with SAP10 and Part L on the horizon – and with new UK homes needing to be zero carbon ready by 2025 – the time for accurate thermal bridging is without question, now.

In a long-running saga of development proposals for a flattened Wigan industrial estate, dating back to 2014, proposal three promises 100% affordable housing.

All 155 homes planned for a former industrial estate near Wigan would be affordable, according to the latest proposals in a long-running saga.

The plans for affordable housing on part of the Bradley Hall Trading Estate in Standish which was ‘flattened’ four years ago is the third proposal for the site.

It comes after plans for 148 homes were approved by Wigan council in 2014, followed by a second application for 163 homes on the site approved in 2018.

But these outline planning applications – which were never acted upon – only committed to making up to 25 pc of the new housing development affordable.

The latest proposal for the site by Torus Developments, one of the largest housing associations in the North West, would see 155 affordable homes built.

Standish Voice, the village’s neighbourhood forum which objected to previous plans for the site, is supportive of the scheme, according to the developer.

A spokesman for the community group said members will be studying the full planning application first before offering its views to the local authority.

He said: “When planning permission was first granted by Wigan council for this site more than five years ago, it was a huge blow to the economy of the village.

“Half of its industrial estate was flattened and businesses lost.

“We would have wanted employment use to return to this site but, if that is not possible, the provision of 100 pc affordable homes is much better than the market priced ones that have been proposed in the past.

“Some people are being priced out of Standish, despite the large number of homes being built here, and a development such as this will mitigate that.”

Around half of the new homes would be three-bedroom terraced or semi-detached dwellings with 31 four-bedroom properties of the same type.

A further 40 two-bedroom homes are also proposed with a mix of apartments, bungalows, terraced and semi-detached dwellings, according to the plans.

There would also be 10 one-bedroom apartments built in the development.

Nearly half of the homes would be available for affordable rent, but most of the properties would be offered as part of shared ownership or rent to buy schemes.

 

Source: Manchester Evening News

 

Fears are growing in the Irish construction sector that the flow of builders across the sea to the UK will become a permanent skills drain and will damage the industry long after it is permitted to reopen fully according to a number of sources in the sector.

Many commercial and industrial construction sites remain closed, even after house-builders were given the go-ahead to return to work earlier this month. A number of UK-based construction recruitment firms are now actively seeking Irish-based workers, it is understood.

This has led to a growing number of builders taking jobs elsewhere, particularly those who originally came to Ireland from eastern Europe.

Mick Flynn of Flynn Construction, which focuses on commercial projects such as data centres and healthcare facilities, said that he was directly aware of a growing number of firms who had lost skilled tradespeople that would be difficult to replace.

“It’s been going on for the past ten weeks,” he said. “We’ve been been losing skilled workers, especially carpenters, dryliners and facade specialists. I’m aware of one mechanical and electrical firm that has just lost a whole team of electricians.”

Of the 145,000 usually employed in construction, 80,000 are “hard hat” workers on sites. 40,000 of those were effectively put out of work when 782 of Ireland’s 1,500 sites were closed by the lockdown. Industry sources estimate that as many as 20,000 still have not returned to work and that many of these are foreign workers. A large proportion of these travelled to their home countries for Christmas but did not return to Ireland since because of the shutdown.
Flynn said he could not blame workers for leaving, as they had to make a living.

“We’re the only country in Europe that shut down construction,” he said. A serious concern has emerged amongst building workers that, even if the industry is fully reopened in the weeks to come, it could be shut down again in the autumn if Covid cases increase again.

“It’s extremely frustrating, as we’re going to really struggle to complete our projects whenever we get to open, due to the shortage of skilled workers,” said Flynn.

A spokesman for the Construction Industry Federation (CIF) said the organisation was concerned about the potential impact on the industry’s capacity.

“Just last week, the Government’s review of the National Development Plan highlighted concerns about the industry’s capacity in terms of delivering critical projects.

“There will be an impact on numbers in the industry in the coming months, as many employees have left those companies still affected by the unnecessary lockdown in the commercial sector.

“In addition, thousands of foreign workers have not returned to the industry after Christmas, due to the lockdown which began in January,” he said.

Skills shortages – combined with increases in material input prices due to Covid and Brexit – will put upward pressure on costs and dampen the impact of construction on the Irish economic recovery in the coming months, he said.

“Ireland is the only country in the world to have locked down its construction industry. What’s deeply frustrating is that this lockdown is an economic own-goal that’s lasted since January 4.

“The HSE’s evidence shows that the industry is safe and doesn’t contribute to the spread of Covid, due to its safety protocols. The Government has seen these data and must have accepted our safety record when deciding to reopen housing last month.”

“It defies logic – and many international clients whose projects have stalled are perplexed as to why all global manufacturing, all public sector projects, and all housing can continue… while their office and plants cannot,” he said.

 

Source: Independent.ei

 

Tarmac and Forth Ports have signed a long-term agreement to create the UK’s largest construction materials terminal at the Port of Tilbury in Essex.

The long-term agreement follows a £250M pound investment made by Forth Ports at Tilbury2, the UK’s newest port.

The facility is a purpose-built aggregate processing and manufacturing facility, located to serve London and the South East, with multimodal connectivity.

The riverside location combined with a dedicated railhead means efficient delivery of construction materials into central London without the use of heavy road haulage, supporting Tarmac’s commitment to reducing emissions and creating a safer environment for other road users.

Tarmac senior vice president Peter Buckley said: “Construction materials have a critical role to play in helping deliver the major infrastructure and construction projects which are supporting the UK’s economic recovery and long-term development.

“Our agreement with Forth Ports underlines a continued focus by Tarmac to develop industry leading facilities which will support these schemes, with the Build Back Better agenda and a clear commitment to driving sustainability and enhanced efficiencies.”

Forth Ports chief executive Charles Hammond added: “This is an exciting time for Tilbury2 as we sign a significant, long term agreement with Tarmac to create the UK’s largest construction materials terminal.

“This facility will be a game changer in the coronavirus economic recovery campaign to Build Back Better and is a good example of high productivity investment adding value to raw materials.

“I am pleased that the signing of this agreement comes at the same time as we have been awarded Freeport status, which will bring further investment and jobs to the area.”

Source: New Civil Engineer

 

 

Recognition for innovation from the FLTA

Combilift, the Irish manufacturer of a wide range of handling solutions, has won its 10th prestigious industry award from the Forklift Truck Association for one of its latest products. The 2020 FLTA Awards for Excellence took place virtually on Saturday 10th April, having been postponed from last year due to Covid,

The recently introduced Combi-CBE model – the world’s first counterbalance design, multidirectional forklift with electric drive on all of its three wheels, was one of the twelve finalists in the hotly contested Innovation Category. According to the host of this year’s Awards, “this is the category that everyone wants to win, as you get to feel incredibly clever.” So Combilift was immensely proud that the jury singled it out as the outright winner.

The Combi-CBE features internationally patented electric traction which enables independent control of each of the front and rear drive wheels and guarantees 100% traction control, which negates the need for differential lock when it is operating on wet or slippery surfaces. As the truck drives and steers, the speed and rotational direction of the wheels are controlled independently. Operators benefit from precise acceleration and deceleration control, which significantly reduces long load momentum twisting when travelling sideways. Each electric drive incorporates parking and regenerative dynamic braking for power efficiency and AC drive means that there are no mechanical brushes to maintain or replace.

Combining the benefits of very compact dimensions and the ability to handle long loads as well as pallets, the multidirectional Combi-CBE is a universal truck for multiple applications and offers cost effective and efficient operation. It also answers growing market demand for powerful and quieter electric forklifts which comply with ever more stringent emissions guidelines. The FLTA commented as follows: “a clever and innovative design, Combilift’s entry impressed the panel with its unique, independent front and rear wheel drive, letting it handle long loads in the tightest spaces while minimising tyre wear.”

 

 

Combilift CEO and Co-Founder Martin McVicar said: “Innovation is a cornerstone of Combilift’s product development and, given the large number of excellent finalists this year, we would like to thank the FLTA jury of industry experts for recognising our achievements.”

www.combilift.com

 

 

Majority of developers are optimistic their projects won’t be impacted by Brexit this year

Some 66% of developers do not expect any of their developments to be negatively impacted this year as a result of the Brexit deal, according to the latest DFT poll. Just over a third (34%) think it will adversely affect them.

With the pandemic causing the closure and slowdown of many development sites during the past year, alongside numerous lenders pulling out of the market or putting their funding on hold, developers have had a difficult period starting or completing their projects. As we emerge from the dark shadow of Covid restrictions, will Brexit become the next hurdle to hold the development market back?

Phil Gould, principal at Avamore Capital, emphasised that the impact of the UK’s separation from the EU had been felt long before Brexit formally took place. “Soon after the 2016 referendum, the market saw reports around the reduction of available labour from the EU workforce; furthermore, developers were already experiencing the impacts of increased material costs due to fluctuating exchange rates against the euro. Cost overruns and unexpected delays were a clear consequence of Brexit uncertainty before this year (indicated by the launch of our finish and exit product in 2019, which was designed to address exactly these points) and so, we witnessed developers working to the circumstances around them. This year, Brexit consequences may be set to intensify, but developers have had the luxury of time and been able to foresee some of these issues arising, and therefore make appropriate allowances.”

While the housing shortage persists, interest rates remain low, the availability of funding remains high, and the government continues to support the construction sector through planning reform and economic support, it stands to reason why developers are still hopeful.

It’s all about residential

Clearly, there is currently more confidence in the residential sector, which likely reflects the lack of supply, compared with the commercial property market. According to the January 2021 Land Registry UK House Price Index, the average property price stood at £249,309 — a 7.5% rise year-on-year. The North West witnessed the strongest growth, where prices increased by 12%.

“We obviously have an enormous shortage of housing, and it is difficult to see that changing any time soon,” said Adam Tauber, specialist underwriter of development finance at Crystal Specialist Finance. He added that there has been a surge of commercial-to-residential developments and expects this type of conversion to be unaffected by Brexit.

Robert Orr, managing director at Paragon Development Finance, points to the extension of the stamp duty holiday as having provided further stimulus, while the new iteration of the Help to Buy scheme will support those looking to purchase their first home. “Many people have been forced to spend much more time at home and that has helped them reconsider what they want from their property, including quality of finish and efficiency of space, which can be better catered for by new-build homes,” he commented.

“Developers are also marketing property in an environment of constrained supply. Housing stock for sale is below historical levels as people have held off putting their homes up for sale during a pandemic, so this has created a strong environment for developers when combined with an upsurge in buyer demand.”

Roxana Mohammadian-Molina, CSO at Blend Network, commented that government support for first-time buyers has created renewed optimism among developers, “especially those focused on building houses in the more affordable price tranche.”

Access to finance has also improved, with liquidity from credit funds, banks and PE firms flooding back into the development market. In addition, mortgage availability is returning to normal levels and higher LTVs, and the government’s new 95% mortgage guarantee scheme will also assist the buyer market and give developers confidence they have secure exits for their sites. “Being able to access competitive finance has allowed developers to generate good returns on projects, and many are confident investing for the longer term, where returns will be realised in 18-24 months,” reported Cameron Hayes, asset finance adviser of structured finance at Arc & Co.

Prime real estate, especially in central London, is also still seen as an attractive asset for investment and development on a global scale. “Due to the prime market’s resilience, we have seen great optimism from our developer community,” confirmed Uma Rajah, CEO at CapitalRise. Over the past 12 months, the lender’s loan book has benefitted from double-digit growth, having screened over £5.4bn of deals in 2020.

“The pandemic and Brexit did not stop the progression of our projects; in fact, all development sites CapitalRise is currently funding have remained open throughout the various lockdowns and works continue to progress well. The prime property market is strongly linked to international buyers and investors rather than European ones, so the Brexit impact on demand in the sector is expected to be minimal.”

While the huge spike in national debt and rising unemployment could also affect the property market’s confidence and buyer behaviour, Uma believes that the shortage of housing stock and having been in lockdown for much of the past year mean that people are keen to get moving. “For CapitalRise, Brexit is priced into our valuations and has been for a long time. [Provided] developers stay true to the business model that works best for them and they are realistic to the headwinds that lie ahead, then in partnership with a dependable lender, they should still be able to see their projects to completion and, ultimately, profitable success.”

Richard Jones, managing director at Pilot Fish Finance, is seeing a rise in demand for rural homes with outdoor space, which offers developers an opportunity to move into new markets. “Equally, with so many commercial spaces now sitting empty, developers have an opportunity to redesign our high streets,” he said.

The growth in the BTR sector has also given developers access to institutional buyers and new sources of capital, such as forward funding or purchase structures. “This sector will only grow in volume and size as time goes by,” commented Steven Oliver, COO at Peritus Corporate Finance.

While the full impact of Brexit is yet unknown, it is likely to be felt through increased prices in raw materials and possible labour shortages, feeding into higher wage and materials costs across the sector. Positively, this could drive down residual land values and the price developers pay for sites — something which is an ongoing problem.

“There’s no doubt that it is becoming harder for developers to complete schemes on time and on budget,” said James Bloom, director at Alternative Bridging Corporation. “A combination of Brexit and the pandemic has increased the costs of materials and created long waits for some items, while sites need to allow for social distancing guidelines.”

Planning ahead for both the build and arranging finance is therefore vital. “It’s likely that many developers are going to reach the expiration of their development finance arrangements before they are ready to move on from a scheme, and so it’s important to look into refinancing options early.”

“Our well educated and experienced approach to risk helped us to plan ahead for the likelihood of a hard Brexit,” said Uma. “CapitalRise has always undertaken a rigorous assessment process for new loans. In doing so, we actively challenge what the true costs, programme and demand is for any one project given the location and demographic, together with the validity of comparable evidence.” To date, while it has seen labour shortages and rising costs, the work it undertakes at the outset has held the lender and its borrowers in good shape — “forewarned is forearmed!”

Robert highlighted that the experienced developers Paragon supports have been building in levels of contingency across the board, whether for costs, programme times, or both. “There is also optimism that some of the European labour force who returned to their home countries during lockdown will come back as travel restrictions ease. This doesn’t look to be imminent as the roll-out of vaccines in European countries has been slower, but it will eventually stabilise.”

He also thinks that this is an opportunity for the industry to ask itself how it can appeal to new people and make construction and the property industry an attractive place to work. “Work is already underway to improve diversity in construction and I’d like to see that accelerated,” Robert added.

Phil thinks that there could be an increase in the number of apprentices construction workers take on to fill the skills gap.

As part of the Brexit negotiations, the UK agreed a trade deal with Europe so that the import of building materials from the EU was not subject to additional tariffs. “By signing the UK/EU trade deal, price increases due to increased tariffs has been mitigated,” Steven said.

“With regard to materials, obviously, a lot is sourced from outside the UK, and this results in delivery delays and potential increased costs from the Brexit fallout,” added Eli Korman, head of development finance and chief investment officer at TAB. “However, these are just hurdles — not barriers. Developers and their funders need to keep this in mind and ensure their cost plans are robust and have enough contingency to counteract any impact.”

Steven highlighted that the European lockdown has seen shortages of items such as timber and plasterboard, and factories running at reduced capacities will only extend this supply chain problem.

We might see more developers sticking to traditional building methods and materials. “Despite regional variations across the country, traditional materials sourced locally will be the key to preserve costs and, in some cases, reduce overall costs and increase profit for developers,” stated Adam.

On the other hand, we may see more borrowers expanding their supply chain. Cameron divulges that  Arc & Co has witnessed developers sourcing materials from further afield, particularly from some parts of Asia. Developers may also look at ways to agree UK-based supply chains if they have not done so before.

“Clients are looking more intently at their supply chains than ever before and planning procurement far in advance of their needs, to allow time to account for any delays or hold ups while import issues are worked out,” stated Henry South, head of construction insurance at London Belgravia Brokers.

Asim Shirwani, CCO at Lendhub, said that savvy developers will find savings elsewhere, such as through stronger negotiations with contractors on build costs, or cheaper finance packages from lenders.

“From a Brexit standpoint, increased paperwork in relation to imported materials will add further pressure to developers and may also add to delays,” stated Steven. This could lead to more developers using reclaimed materials, which could help save money in the long term, reduce our reliance on EU trade and be better for the environment.

Scott Marshall, founder and managing director of Roma Finance, agrees that developers will adapt and become more efficient in delivering their products. “We are seeing this already; the construction of an individual house is a lot quicker than it was 10 years ago. Off-site manufacturing and modern methods of construction are becoming more commonplace and will only accelerate this.” He pointed out that they also offer huge cost savings, efficiencies and environmental benefits. “I think we will see more of these types of properties.”

What developers should be cautious about this year

There have been reports of a backlog and reduced availability across professional services, such as solicitors, valuers and local authorities, due to high demand and potentially less resource due to the pandemic. This could mean that developers face challenges reaching planning decisions and having valuations undertaken quickly.

Adam believes that developers will be looking at greenfield sites because of brownfield areas being too costly to clear. However, they are likely to face local resistance and planning challenges. “More due diligence and conversations with planning officers will have to be part of a standard development appraisal,” he highlighted. The availability of sites and appropriate infrastructure will also continue to be problematic, with further planning reforms needed.

The biggest hurdle for developers could be around catering for the consumer and the individual needs in a particular area — something which has changed a lot during the health crisis. “Developers needs to think inclusively and not [have a] bottom line, ‘What’s in it for me?’ attitude,” Adam said. This is especially true when looking at the affordability of housing.

Scott references how the profiles of buyers are changing. “There are now more single-person households of all ages, including older people. How do we cater for them? It’s not just about building more homes; we need to be building the right kinds of homes.”

This is also compounded by the requirement for more space at home and the paradigm shift of flexible working. “This will have an impact on consumer demand and the way developers and their professional teams look at designing buildings,” said Cameron. “Squeezing more units into a development may no longer be the best way to maximise return — especially if they take longer to sell.”

Covid has made many people question the desire and need for city centre or urban living. “Developers who have focused for the last decade on urban developments would be well served to diversify their offerings and cater to the growing number of people who are prioritising space over convenience or commuting time,” added Henry.

Graeme Walker, development finance head of lending at Hampshire Trust Bank, advised that potentially higher levels of unemployment following the end of the furlough scheme will have to be managed carefully. “Unemployment will impact some specific geographic locations and demographic groups more than others.”

Eli warned that as sites get finished and come to market towards the end of 2021 to early 2022, there could end up being an oversupply, forcing sales values down. “This could push developers into holding some of the units rather than selling,” he stipulated. “However, when coming to refinance, developers need to be aware that the valuations of GDV that they had been working from prior to Covid are likely to be significantly lower — meaning they may not be able to refinance at the same level they expect.”

Phil remarked that, while the housing sector has been supported throughout the pandemic, it cannot last forever. “In times of prosperity, it is likely to be one of the areas where the government will look to claw back some of the economic losses it has incurred, particularly over the past year. We are already seeing that with the end to the stamp duty reduction on the horizon, and it is likely that there may be a further increase in taxation in the medium- to long-term, and this could have a big effect on willingness to buy and sell. For the moment, however, riding through the Covid storm and making the most of current government support seems to be the main priority for developers.”

It is also important to note that developers are not immune to the return of the stamp duty land tax, which will be brought back in September. “Most experts believe stamp duty to be outdated, as it is levied on purchase rather than profit and is deemed to be one of the main deterrents for people looking to invest in property,” said Asim. Therefore, this could impact the exits of such developments.

Looking at the positives, Robert sees 2021 as more of an opportunity than a challenge. “All being well, the economy should emerge strongly as we rebuild following coronavirus, while some of the trends we have seen emerging over the past decade — such as the growth of online retailing — have been gathering speed. This creates opportunities across all sectors. An area that interests me is the revitalisation of town and city centres and the role property developers could have as we reimagine our towns with mixed living, retail and hospitality spaces. Shifts in how we work also open up new areas for developers outside of traditional commuter lines.”

 

Source: Development Finance Today

 

The programme – which could include home insulation and low/zero emission heating technologies – has been described as one of the most significant actions in the Glasgow region’s covid-19 recovery plan.

A “massive” energy retrofit programme could target over 420,000 homes across the Glasgow city region.

As part of recovery plans from the pandemic, a feasibility study will look at costs, benefits and potential barriers to the scheme.

The programme – which could include home insulation and low/zero emission heating technologies – has been described as one of the most significant actions in the region’s Covid-19 recovery plan.

Properties with the lowest energy efficiency ratings – in energy performance certificate bands D to G – will be the focus of the study.

Analysis of housing stock across the city region found over 428,000 homes need to improve their energy efficiency ratings to meet national policy targets, the city region cabinet was told.

Councillor Jonathan McColl, the leader of West Dunbartonshire Council, presenting an update to the Glasgow city region cabinet, said the programme was a “huge opportunity”.

It would support economic recovery from the pandemic, create skilled jobs, provide quality housing and reduce fuel poverty, he said.

He added: “The scale of the challenge in delivering a retrofit programme like this really is significant.

“The programme is a national as well as a regional priority, meaning there are lots of partners we’ll need to work with.”

Mr McColl said developing a “robust” study was the “first step” in the programme.

Partners include both the Scottish and UK Governments, Skills Development Scotland, the construction industry, social landlords and homeowners.

The £80,000 study will be funded by £65,000 from a Scottish Government recovery renewal fund and a £15,000 contribution from Skills Development Scotland.

Glasgow’s council leader Susan Aitken said: “This is potentially one of the single biggest things that we have to collectively do.

“Both as part of the Covid recovery but also to meet our carbon reduction and climate emergency targets.

“It is absolutely massive and the skills part of it is going to be absolutely crucial.

“We can’t deliver either on recovery or on decarbonisation unless we’ve got the skilled folk to do it.”

The feasibility study is expected to be completed by September.

Appropriate solutions – such as home insultation, clean energy and low/zero emissions heat technologies – will be considered during the study.

It will also look at potential barriers, such as mixed ownership in flats and ensuring uptake among private landlords and homeowners.

A funding model, any skill gaps and the current capacity of the supply chain will be assessed.

The potential scheme is expected to run over at least 10 years.

 

Source: Glasgow Live

 

UK construction activity boomed in March with the purchasing managers’ index reaching 61.7 – the highest reading since the second half of 2014.

This was a sharp rise on February’s 53.3 figure and significantly above the 50 no-change status with housebuilding the best performing category at 64 – the fastest growth since July 2020.

Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply group director Duncan Brock said: “This upturn led to a significant boost in hiring levels with the fastest upturn in job creation since December 2018 offering a clear sign that companies are feeling more positive in planning for new builds and refurbishments of current properties.”

Strong activity increases were also seen in commercial construction, 62.7, and civil engineering, 58, in March, the highest index readings since the second half of 2014.

Survey respondents commented on higher workloads due to greater spending on residential construction work and rising new home sales.

There were also reports of a boost from major infrastructure projects and mobilisation of delayed initiatives in hospitality, leisure, and office development.

Growth projections were the most upbeat since June 2015, reflecting confidence in the UK economic outlook, the improving pandemic situation and pent-up demand.

Hank Zarihs Associates said lenders had noticed that requests for development and refurbishment finance were buoyant.

Supply constraints point to higher material costs

But higher demand for construction products and materials has contributed to longer wait times. Around 41 per cent of the index survey panel reported longer delivery times from suppliers in March, while only one per cent saw an improvement. Supply constraints and logistics issues were commonly reported by construction companies, especially for imported items.

The Construction Leadership Council, CLC, is advising builders to plan ahead as shortages for products and materials are expected to intensify over the next two to three months.

“All users should plan for increased demand and longer delays, keep open lines of communication with their suppliers and order early for future projects,” said the CLC’s product availability working group.

It pointed out that not enough timber was being produced and that other countries such as America and China were paying more to secure supply. Plastics, cement and aggregates, steel, roof tiles, bricks and imported products such as screws, fixings, plumbing items and sanitaryware are all scarce.

The collapse of corporate giant Carillion in January 2018, highlights a culture of financial deviance embedded at the heart of the UK construction sector, according to research by London South Bank University (LSBU).

The research shows that, following the collapse of a major financial institution like Carillion, individuals and teams in the wider construction sector, often accommodate, explain away or normalize discrepancies and problems. These become part of a culture which unintentionally reduces awareness of the potential consequences of that deviant behaviour. Taken together, these factors can result in a company not following codes of practice while failing to anticipate and manage a wide range of potential reputational issues and structural internal crises.

By performing a qualitative analysis on the collapse of construction giant, Carillion, the researchers have exposed the most common deviant practices and sources of ‘normalization of deviance’ embedded in the sector. The findings suggest that ‘normalization of deviance’ lies not only internally, but also externally, in the wider industry environment in which construction organizations operate. The results sound an alarm bell and call for structural reform of the construction industry to prevent the negative effects of corporate deviance.

The research detected three distinct types of ‘normalization of deviance’ that existed within Carillion before the corporation’s collapse that could also be prevalent in the wider construction sector:

  • Late payment to suppliers;
  • Aggressive accounting;
  • Auditors failing to identify problems.

The researchers categorized these three types of ‘normalization of deviance’ as internal or external, depending on whether they related to the company under observation or its main stakeholders. They observed that, while in hindsight, these practices could be viewed as unacceptable, their emergence was a gradual process that took place over several years. This pattern of corporate behaviour indicates that ‘normalization of deviance’ is likely to be embedded in corporate culture and very difficult to detect in the initial stages of its development.

The researchers found that the business characteristics in the construction industry, with its highly competitive and pressurized culture, low profit margins, complex and uncertain undertakings, have all contributed to the emergence of questionable business practices.

The research project is led by Dr Sara Hajikazemi, Senior Lecturer in Project Management at LSBU’s Business School, in collaboration with co-authors from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology and Nord University in Norway, and the University of Oulu and Tampere University in Finland.

Dr Sara Hajikazemi, said, “Our research shows that ‘normalized deviance’ has always been present in the construction sector.

“What is concerning is that, as happened with Carillion, construction companies currently lack an early warning system that could alert them to emerging signs of deviant corporate behaviour and malpractice. This means that the construction industry is still likely to be at risk of falling prey to ‘normalized deviance’ and its damaging consequences in future.’’